FLAT EARTH!!!: Yes Niggas I'm Still Here... The Re-Up... Get Yo' Popcorn...
- Thread starter 14damoney
- Start date
Do you believe, based on the article I posted, that the horizon would be the same on the flat or round earth?
YES or NO
Asshole.
What the fuck do you mean when you say "the same"?
Are you so dense that you don't understand how many different things that could entail?
What kind of engineer are you bruh? Dead ass.
http://www.askamathematician.com/20...d-infinite-area-would-that-change-the-answer/
Q: If Earth was flat, would there be a horizon? If so, what would it look like? If the Earth was flat and had infinite area, would that change the answer?
Physicist: There’d definitely still be a horizon if the Earth were flat. It would be in almost exactly the same place, and look essentially identical. While the Earth isn’t flat, adherents to that theory are correct in that it’s nearly so, and if you’re standing on the surface of a round something the size of the Earth it’s difficult to tell the difference (in fact,mathematically you can make the argument that a flat Earth acts the same as an infinitely big Earth).
For someone around 5’6″ tall, if the Earth were perfectly flat the horizon would be about 0.04° higher. That’s about the width of a (mechanical) pencil lead held at arm’s length. Unless you have short arms, in which case you’ll need to shave down the lead a little.
Even if the Earth were perfectly flat and went on forever, the horizon would still be exactly level: 180° of sky and 180° of ground (instead of the paltry 179.92° of ground we have). The only difference between a finite flat Earth and an infinite flat Earth is that no matter how tall you are on an infinite flat Earth, the horizon always stays in the same place.
ALL I'm asking is do you motherfucking agree? Simple YES or NO.
You fucking asshole
What one THINKS is immaterial. You know what's great about math? It doesn't matter what some intellectual ant THINKS about shit
You know why they call them PROOFS?
What I think or what you think don't mean shit. What does MATH prove?
Now go ahead and debunk math, stupid ass.
And again
What kind of engineer are you?
Nigga engineering lies and shit.
What one THINKS is immaterial. You know what's great about math? It doesn't matter what some intellectual ant THINKS about shit
You know why they call them PROOFS?
What I think or what you think don't mean shit. What does MATH prove?
Now go ahead and debunk math, stupid ass.
And again
What kind of engineer are you?
Nigga engineering lies and shit.
On a infinatly sized earth yes the sun would appear to disapper, but never really, it would fade like stars do in a infinitely large universe.... However once zoomed in with a telescope, you would be able to see that sun just like you can see far stars... Under no circumstances would that sun dip under the plane (flat line) of the Earth if it is above and traveling in a strait line...
You said that you could produce a sun set on a non- infinite table...
And we are waiting.... Better yet you can place a quarter on a long hallway, place the quarter and camera on the ground and I would shut up if you are able to make it set, on a flat ground with the camera above or on the plane of the ground...
If you are not able to produce this with pictures.. Then STFU and sit your ass down!!! You been debunked!!!!!
Remember the reason why stars fade or why the sun would fade in a infinite plane, is because if stars are far away enough they start to fade to the point that gives the illusion that they are fading away...
But the key is they fade, and the sun would scale down and appear to disappear, but never fade under the horizon... No way would you see a big ass sun set, if the world was flat, instead on a infinatly big Earth it would fade away getting smaller and smaller...
So that said where are the pics, or shut the fuck up!!
But the key is they fade, and the sun would scale down and appear to disappear, but never fade under the horizon... No way would you see a big ass sun set, if the world was flat, instead on a infinatly big Earth it would fade away getting smaller and smaller...
So that said where are the pics, or shut the fuck up!!
He's a troll and with out them pics he will be ignored!!! Because now he is just going in circle trying to bullshit his way out the corner he painted himself in..
Yup, I had a trip to go to Japan and they started off west but did a U-turn in the air because they didn't want to bump into the bubble. They injected us with something to make us go to sleep to make it seem it took a shorter time. I know the truth. The sun be rotating around us. It's so much bigger but we got gold and shit. That makes it rotate around us because of the billions of planets in the galaxy, we the one that matters.
Here is absolute proof the sun is being clipped by the curvature of the planet as it sets, and is not scaling down in the horizon... Forward to the 5:30 mark for the action...
For anyone with a IQ of over 70, this shit is the slam dunk confirming everything you knew already...
For anyone with a IQ of over 70, this shit is the slam dunk confirming everything you knew already...
yup man you making some good points. now all you have to do is jump off a bridge and prove gravity aint real.
No there is no gravity, its buoyancy so he may need a flotation device vest to keep him from falling..
Here's the thing,
You said, "Once zoomed in with a telescope you would be able to see that sun just like you can see far stars... Under no circumstances would that sun dip under the plane (flat line) of the Earth if it is above and traveling in a strait line"
And this is correct when you are at the SAME eye level as the sun. If you are BELOW the sun, it will set. Yes, if you ascend to the altitude of the sun, it will only get smaller but never disappear. Otherwise, it will dip down below the plane.
If the horizon at eye level on ground are the same (flat or ball) as the article states, then the distance to the horizon of a 6 foot tall person is 3 miles, flat OR round.
3 miles = 15,840ft | 4,828m
If we are going to scale that down to the size of a table, 4,828mm would be a 16 foot table.
But the coin would only be 2mm high (6ft). Too small.
Make the coin 2cm (realistic coin size) , the table becomes 160 ft, analogous to the 6ft person and the 3 mile horizon.If I'm on the same eye-level as the coin, I'm going to see the coin the whole time, JUST LIKE YOU'RE proposing. HOWEVER, if I'm BELOW the coin, THEN the coin will disappear beyond the length of the table.
HOWEVER,
I have Cinema4D and I'm doing a 3D mockup to EXACT PROPORTIONS that show the coin DISAPPEARS beyond the horizon.early screenshot:
STAY TUNED for that.
For the Record:
In the original video of the coin I posted, the TABLE EDGE was meant to be the horizon line, the table surface was BEYOND the horizon and the COIN was the SUN, which going back to HEIGHT, and being on relative sea-level by being below the coin/level with the surface of the table, the coin disappeared BEYOND THE HORIZON.
Even at 1 foot high off the ground with no obstruction you can see 1.22 miles according to the horizon distance calculator.....
Meanwhile.....
If YOU AGREE that the horizon, whether flat or round is the same per the article I posted (http://www.askamathematician.com/20...d-infinite-area-would-that-change-the-answer/), then you STILL have 1601 feet to account for in this picture AND Toronto AND everywhere else you muthafuckas are claiming "superior mirages" when CLEARLY you see upright buildings.
That's why you lose. That is why you fucking lose.
Because you can't explain how all around this muthafucka, from Lake Pontchartrain in Louisiana to fucking Toronto, Canada, that you can see distances with you own eyes that an earth curvature calculator tells you you SHOULDN'T SEE, on a round ball because...
It's FLAT!
Last edited:
Last edited:
Go try to book the flight see what happens. Just go see...
DRIVING DISTANCE FLYING TIME COST PLACES
The flight time from New Zealand to Argentina is:
12 hours, 35 minutes
From:
To:
Depart:
Return:
Get:
Get:
From:
To:
Change your flying speed:
mph knots km/h
take-off and landing: minutes
Flight map from New Zealand to Argentina
Click here to show map
More trip calculations
- flying distance from New Zealand to Argentina
- reverse flying time from Argentina to New Zealand
- airports in Argentina
- airlines that fly to Argentina
- time difference between New Zealand and Argentina
find a flight to Argentina
From:
To:
Depart:
Return:
Get:
Flying time from New Zealand to Argentina
The total flight duration from New Zealand to Argentina is 12 hours, 35 minutes.
This assumes an average flight speed for a commercial airliner of 500 mph, which is equivalent to 805 km/h or 434 knots. It also adds an extra 30 minutes for take-off and landing. Your exact time may vary depending on wind speeds.
If you're planning a trip, remember to add more time for the plane to taxi between the gate and the airport runway. This measurement is only for the actual flying time. You should also factor in airport wait times and possible equipment or weather delays. If you're trying to figure out what time you'll arrive at the destination, you may want to see if there's a time difference between New Zealand and Argentina.
The calculation of flight time is based on the straight line flight distance from New Zealand to Argentina ("as the crow flies"), which is about 6,039 miles or 9 719 kilometers.
Your trip begins in New Zealand.
It ends in Argentina.
Your flight direction from New Zealand to Argentina is Southeast (136 degrees from North).
The flight time calculator measures the average flight duration between points
Here is the link...http://www.travelmath.com/flying-time/from/New+Zealand/to/Argentina
DRIVING DISTANCE FLYING TIME COST PLACES
The flight time from New Zealand to Argentina is:
12 hours, 35 minutes
From:
To:
Depart:
Return:
Get:
Get:
From:
To:
Change your flying speed:
mph knots km/h
take-off and landing: minutes
Flight map from New Zealand to Argentina
Click here to show map
More trip calculations
- flying distance from New Zealand to Argentina
- reverse flying time from Argentina to New Zealand
- airports in Argentina
- airlines that fly to Argentina
- time difference between New Zealand and Argentina
find a flight to Argentina
From:
To:
Depart:
Return:
Get:
Flying time from New Zealand to Argentina
The total flight duration from New Zealand to Argentina is 12 hours, 35 minutes.
This assumes an average flight speed for a commercial airliner of 500 mph, which is equivalent to 805 km/h or 434 knots. It also adds an extra 30 minutes for take-off and landing. Your exact time may vary depending on wind speeds.
If you're planning a trip, remember to add more time for the plane to taxi between the gate and the airport runway. This measurement is only for the actual flying time. You should also factor in airport wait times and possible equipment or weather delays. If you're trying to figure out what time you'll arrive at the destination, you may want to see if there's a time difference between New Zealand and Argentina.
The calculation of flight time is based on the straight line flight distance from New Zealand to Argentina ("as the crow flies"), which is about 6,039 miles or 9 719 kilometers.
Your trip begins in New Zealand.
It ends in Argentina.
Your flight direction from New Zealand to Argentina is Southeast (136 degrees from North).
The flight time calculator measures the average flight duration between points
Here is the link...http://www.travelmath.com/flying-time/from/New+Zealand/to/Argentina
TRY TO BOOK THE FLIGHT AND SEE WHAT HAPPENS!!!
and I see you NOT acknowledging that 1,601ft!
Don't try to to change the subject now nigga, talking about being backed into a corner, what's up noooow??
No pics all you get isTRY TO BOOK THE FLIGHT AND SEE WHAT HAPPENS!!!
and I see you NOT acknowledging that 1,601ft!
Don't try to to change the subject now nigga, talking about being backed into a corner, what's up noooow??
No pics all you get is
Don't need pics, nigga. YOU CAN'T EXPLAIN the 1,601ft so miss me with that bullshit.
GAME OVER
Now here is the flight path from New Zealand to Buenos Aires (close to Argentina) on a normal map its twice the size of the U.S. and we know it takes 6 hours to get to L.A. to N.Y so year 12 hours seems right judging by this map...
Now lets see how this same 12 hour flight looks like on a Flat Earth Map..
Wow this shit looks like its 7 times bigger than the U.S. east to west... I wonder how they can do it in 12 hours.....
Now here is the flight path from New Zealand to Buenos Aires (close to Argentina) on a normal map its twice the size of the U.S. and we know it takes 6 hours to get to L.A. to N.Y so year 12 hours seems right judging by this map...
Now lets see how this same 12 hour flight looks like on a Flat Earth Map..
Wow this shit looks like its 7 times bigger than the U.S. east to west... I wonder how they can do it in 12 hours.....
ALL of that is fine and dandy...
try to BOOK THE FLIGHT THOUGH!
Fuck your distances nigga. If you wanna go there tell me why GPS stops working in the Southern Hemisphere! Do you know about that part yet??
1601ft! I'm WAITING!
Dude I don't even know what your 1601 is about, I told you I stopped listening to your bullshit as soon as you said you were able to make a coin set on a table with the camera above...ALL of that is fine and dandy...
try to BOOK THE FLIGHT THOUGH!
Fuck your distances nigga. If you wanna go there tell me why GPS stops working in the Southern Hemisphere! Do you know about that part yet??
1601ft! I'm WAITING!
Until I see the pics from that claim all that shit is just like the rest of your shit..
Plus your theory has a major flaw that I just addressed, there is no way you can come close to traveling close to 7 times the size of the U.S. going at the 600 mph (standard airline speed) and do it in 12 hours, to do so you have to be traveling over 1,476 mph...
So lets keep shit simple by explaining that first.... If not the rest of your argument is non in void!!!!!
Even a 5 year old could look at that map and tell you, no way your flying there in 12 hours....
I realize that there is only one person that is as dumb as you and his name is Fuzzy McNut, he's a fag so you must be one also, and sorry I don't talk to fags, let alone retarded ones!!!
So being that you are officially on dumb Troll status I am going to do something you really worked hard to earn...... Welcome to Ignore land, you big dumb ape!
So being that you are officially on dumb Troll status I am going to do something you really worked hard to earn...... Welcome to Ignore land, you big dumb ape!
It's a toss up between this thread and this one here..
http://www.bgol.us/forum/index.php?threads/project-lucifer-saturn-the-new-sun.188359/
I am late to this thread. Hilarity is as plentiful as it should be I see.
But yo fam, I have three questions.
If the Earth is flat wouldn't clouds and storms like hurricanes or typhoons roll off into space....like falling off of the edge of a table or waterfall?
How does gravity factor into relating to the properties of a flat body vs a spherical body? How can a flat body rotate to a point in which it can generate the level of gravity that we have here on Earth?
Why do all of the other planets and the sun appear to be spherical in nature and not flat?
Last edited: