Is anyone on here REALLY voting for Kamala ? Why should I vote for Kamala?
- Thread starter Slowhands
- Start date
Dem's are violent...
Jan 6.. that is all
That's all u LGBTQ have
Dem's started slavery, top that fruitcake...
I am not, nor ever have been, in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the white and black races—that I am not nor ever have been in favor of making voters or jurors of negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermingling with white people; and I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which will ever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality. And inasmuch as they cannot so live, while they do remain together, there must be the position of superior. I am as much as any other man in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race.That's all u LGBTQ have
Abe Lincoln, Republican, October 15, 1858
but its pointless to get into it with you numbnuts because you dont stand for anything you just troll and not even well.
I don’t see where it specifies individuallyAgrarian reforms in Cuba - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
The Supreme Court Just Made It Easier for Republicans to Get Away With Racial Gerrymandering
The Supreme Court on Thursday upheld the constitutionality of a South Carolina congressional map that a lower court had previously found diluted the power of Black voters. In a 6-3 decision authored by Justice Samuel Alito, the Court’s conservative supermajority wrote that “the Challengers provided no direct evidence of a racial gerrymander, and their circumstantial evidence is very weak.”
A GOP state senator from the area said he wanted to “give the district a stronger Republican lean.” Republicans accomplished that goal by moving nearly 30,000 Black voters in Charleston County (62 percent of the county’s total Black population) from the swing 1st district to the safely Democratic seat of longtime Rep. James Clyburn, one of the most powerful House Democrats.
A federal court ruled in January 2023 that the map was a “stark racial gerrymander.” But the Supreme Court disagreed, finding that South Carolina Republicans were motivated by politics, not race, and “acted in good faith.” The conservative justices rejected the factual findings of the lower court, which the high court is only supposed to do if the findings are clearly wrong. The court’s delay in issuing a ruling (civil rights groups had asked the justices to rule by the beginning of the year) already forced the lower court to allow the disputed map to stay in place for this election, handing Republicans another House seat for 2024.
In her dissent, Justice Elena Kagan said that the decision would make it much harder to strike down racially gerrymandered maps. “The majority’s new evidentiary rule is meant to scuttle gerrymandering cases,” she wrote. Going forward, plaintiffs now need to show extremely clear evidence of racial gerrymandering because courts are now supposed to give legislators the benefit of the doubt. This will make it easier for white Republicans to dilute the votes of communities of color. As Kagan’s dissent points out, Alito’s majority opinion places “uncommon burdens on gerrymandered plaintiffs” that will make it very difficult to bring successful racial gerrymandering cases in the future. “This Court is not supposed to be so fearful of telling discriminators, including States, to stop discriminating,” Kagan wrote.
The Supreme Court just made it easier for Republicans to get away with racial gerrymandering
The conservative supermajority upheld South Carolina's congressional map.
www.motherjones.com
I never understood that. Why not just move to a country that runs that way. You don’t go to Burger King demanding tacoshe lives in a capitalistic society and thinks he can convert the country to old world socialism without bloodshed...
he reminds me of that radical group MOVE back in the day in philly... a back to nature cult who insisted on living in urban areas...
just ridiculous..
The agency adapted the Soviet model of organisation—small collectives (Asociación Nacional de Agricultures Pequeños) and large(er) state farms.Agrarian reforms in Cuba - Wikipedia
yeah...thats going fly in America..
okay fruitcake
I didn't vote for Kamala.
I voted against Trump.
I don't expect her to anything more than any other President has.
I don't subscribe to these cults of personalities.
Trump should absolutely not be in office. The republicans wouldn't choose a better candidate, so now they get to deal with the fallout that comes with their choice.
I voted against Trump.
I don't expect her to anything more than any other President has.
I don't subscribe to these cults of personalities.
Trump should absolutely not be in office. The republicans wouldn't choose a better candidate, so now they get to deal with the fallout that comes with their choice.
Bush2 was bad but for the last 15 years the GOP has gone full NUTTER...
Any vote not for Trump IS a vote for Harris.
See how that logic works both ways?
not necessarily dummy there are other candidates on the ballot...Any vote not for Trump IS a vote for Harris.
See how that logic works both ways?
who did YOU vote FOR??
watch this answer....
Stop being emotional fruitcakethats all you got...see case in point...troll like a retard.
practice what you preach retardStop being emotional fruitcake
Not really.Any vote not for Trump IS a vote for Harris.
See how that logic works both ways?
I was a Bernie supporter. He had the right ideas. He too, has aged out of Presidential runs. There are a lot of people in the middle. I want lower taxes, universal health care and I don't really give a shit about women killing their own babies.
Both parties have beef with me and since drug companies pay for both sides, all we get in the U.S. is expensive health insurance and bought-and-paid-for candidates. Neither candidate is going to go against them.
The problem is the party system.
No matter what, I've been against Trump long before his Presidential run. I have hated that dude ever since he tried to put Vera Coking out of her house using eminent domain as a reason. Dude has been a slimeball even when he was claiming democrat. I would never support him no matter what.
I guess that makes me a neverTrumper?
I don't see how a Black man can vote for a presidential candidate who says, he wants cops to have full immunity.
I don’t see how a black man can vote for a presidential candidate who actually locked up black men with no remorse.
For the pro-whites, words > actions.
from the heritage foundation...a conservative white think tank:
The truth is that Harris’ record shows that she is soft on crime and committed to coddling criminals at the expense of victims and our communities. Consider two cases from her time as San Francisco’s district attorney.
Harris refused to seek the death penalty against a man suspected of being a gang member, Edwin Ramos, who shot and killed a father and his two sons, even though California allows the state to seek the death penalty for multiple murders by the same person. Not only did Ramos kill three innocent people, but he also had previously been charged with robbing a pregnant woman.
In a different case, when a gang member killed San Francisco police Officer Isaac Espinoza and wounded his partner, Harris again refused to seek the death penalty.
At the time, this was considered radical even by liberal Democrats.
Kamala Harris Is Trying to Run From Her Prosecutorial Record
When Cook County State’s Attorney Kim Foxx was elected to office in 2016, she appointed a transition team to develop policy recommendations. That team was co-chaired by then-California Attorney General and Sen.-elect Kamala Harris. Other than Harris, no one else on the transition team had been...
www.heritage.org
from Vox a liberal media site
Harris’s priorities as a prosecutor
Harris’s record as a prosecutor is difficult to define in clear ideological terms in part because it includes many contradictions — supporting diversion programs for young people on the one hand, while pushing back against wrongful conviction claims on the other. In many ways, her time as a prosecutor looked like a balancing act: She pushed for a fairer criminal justice system at a time when prosecutors were far less concerned about unjust outcomes, but she also made sure to never push too far.Before she became district attorney, she prosecuted cases of child sexual assault and domestic violence, a priority she brought with her into the DA’s office. But some sexual assault survivors have criticized Harris, saying she didn’t go far enough to combat sexual assault.
Ruthless “cop” or “soft on crime”? Kamala Harris’s record as prosecutor, explained.
The vice president’s days as a California prosecutor are difficult to define in clear ideological terms.
www.vox.com
so which is it?? is she tough on crime or soft on crime????
So those Black men committed crimes, and she physically put cuffs on them?
Did she put on a black robe, bang her gavel, say "guilty," and sentence them, too?
If so,
It seems like niggaz needs to stop committing crimes.
Did she put on a black robe, bang her gavel, say "guilty," and sentence them, too?
If so,
It seems like niggaz needs to stop committing crimes.
Exactly!
Can't have it both ways.
Black people against Harris say she's tough on the brothas.
Locked up 1,500 black men... yada, yada, yada!!!
BUT...
When you ask white people against Harris,
they say she was soft, letting people off the hook, yada, yada, yada!!!
GOOGLE IS FREE MY PEOPLE!
( Not you @geechiedan )
Can't have it both ways.
Black people against Harris say she's tough on the brothas.
Locked up 1,500 black men... yada, yada, yada!!!
BUT...
When you ask white people against Harris,
they say she was soft, letting people off the hook, yada, yada, yada!!!
GOOGLE IS FREE MY PEOPLE!
( Not you @geechiedan )
from the heritage foundation...a conservative white think tank:
The truth is that Harris’ record shows that she is soft on crime and committed to coddling criminals at the expense of victims and our communities. Consider two cases from her time as San Francisco’s district attorney.
Harris refused to seek the death penalty against a man suspected of being a gang member, Edwin Ramos, who shot and killed a father and his two sons, even though California allows the state to seek the death penalty for multiple murders by the same person. Not only did Ramos kill three innocent people, but he also had previously been charged with robbing a pregnant woman.
In a different case, when a gang member killed San Francisco police Officer Isaac Espinoza and wounded his partner, Harris again refused to seek the death penalty.
At the time, this was considered radical even by liberal Democrats.
Kamala Harris Is Trying to Run From Her Prosecutorial Record
When Cook County State’s Attorney Kim Foxx was elected to office in 2016, she appointed a transition team to develop policy recommendations. That team was co-chaired by then-California Attorney General and Sen.-elect Kamala Harris. Other than Harris, no one else on the transition team had been...
from Vox a liberal media site
Harris’s priorities as a prosecutor
Harris’s record as a prosecutor is difficult to define in clear ideological terms in part because it includes many contradictions — supporting diversion programs for young people on the one hand, while pushing back against wrongful conviction claims on the other. In many ways, her time as a prosecutor looked like a balancing act: She pushed for a fairer criminal justice system at a time when prosecutors were far less concerned about unjust outcomes, but she also made sure to never push too far.
Before she became district attorney, she prosecuted cases of child sexual assault and domestic violence, a priority she brought with her into the DA’s office. But some sexual assault survivors have criticized Harris, saying she didn’t go far enough to combat sexual assault.
Ruthless “cop” or “soft on crime”? Kamala Harris’s record as prosecutor, explained.
The vice president’s days as a California prosecutor are difficult to define in clear ideological terms.
so which is it?? is she tough on crime or soft on crime????
Anybody seen geechieThe agency adapted the Soviet model of organisation—small collectives (Asociación Nacional de Agricultures Pequeños) and large(er) state farms.
yeah...thats going fly in America..