Fuck
I need to stay out this thread for a bit shits fucking tragic
Fuck
You're assuming 3 letter agencies like DHS, DOD, NSA, CIA and so on, buy data from private companies?And they still haven't found the 1/6 bomber. And who do you think those agencies get the info from? private companies you pay to collect your data.
People shot up groups in the past. The access to guns isn't the same -- that's a lie. We had gun control acts in 1930s and the 1990s. All of that has expired.
Collapseable stock is for concealment and cqc you dipshit. Pistol grip makes the gun more manageable for longer engagements, as in when you're putting rounds down range in quick succession, useful when mowing down elementsary school classrooms.Since you seem to know it all, explain to all of us how something like a collapsible stock or a pistol grip makes a firearm more dangerous?
It wasntIf that's directed to me, look back at what I asked. I said what has changed from the past to today. Why are there mass shootings today. I'm literally asking, looking for an answer. I'm not on here trolling or trying to start arguments. Unlike others, I don't come on BGOL looking to argue. Pointless.
I know what you're getting at and wasn't arguing any of that. Just saying how the specifications pointed out in the bill are outdated based on how firearms are designed now which would make it much more difficult to get passed these days.Argue with the statistics. That bill was a response to 3 mass shootings in the 80s and early 90s. The stats show that mass shootings were much lower when it was in effect.
I don't care about the technical aspect of guns. That shit bores me. I'd rather collect postage stamps. The point is gun violence went down when it passed.
You just exposed yourself to not only show that you don't know what you're talking about but also that you clearly don't pay attention either. So rather than waste my time continuing firearm conversation with someone who clearly knows far less than they think they do, I'll just watch you continue to make a fool of yourself with all that inaccurate delusional babble you seem to enjoy spewing out especially now that you're questioning whether I own or train with any firearms.Concealment you dipshit. Pistol grip makes the gun more manageable for longer engagements, as in when you're putting rounds down range in quick succession, useful when mowing down elementsary school classrooms.
Do you even own a single firearm? Do you shoot them? Nigga you sound stupid as fuck if you do. Just stop you fucking dummy. If it wasnt a useful feature why... you know what, you too slow to debate my g. I can tell you've never spent time at a range or shot from different platforms. Fuckin contrarian clown
GoodYou just exposed yourself to not only show that you don't know what you're talking about but also that you clearly don't pay attention either. So rather than waste my time continuing firearm conversation with someone who clearly knows far less than they think they do, I'll just watch you continue to make a fool of yourself with all that inaccurate delusional babble you seem to enjoy spewing out especially now that you're questioning whether I own or train with any firearms.
Yep.It was the same at the Parkland school shooting. Cops outside while the shooter was inside killing.
I'm not assuming it. It's been reported. The government does buy data from private companies.You're assuming 3 letter agencies like DHS, DOD, NSA, CIA and so on, buy data from private companies?
And my question about what changed from the past is me literally asking what has changed, if it is easier today to buy a gun, then I didn't know. Don't know what the procedures were to buy prior to the gun control acts. The majority of what was passed was just to put black people in jail from the 90's.
That and the fact one party in our two-party system lost its fucking mind. This why a proposed ban failed in 2013, less than a year after Sandy Hook. We're not dealing with rational people.I know what you're getting at and wasn't arguing any of that. Just saying how the specifications pointed out in the bill are outdated based on how firearms are designed now which would make it much more difficult to get passed these days.
Lmaooooooooooo
But don't think they don't have their own surveillance way more sophisticated than private companies. That article is saying the govt violated the 4th amendment? Then what is the company doing, that's crazy. But then they will say we gave those rights up when we agreed to install apps? SmhI'm not assuming it. It's been reported. The government does buy data from private companies.
Federal Agencies Are Secretly Buying Consumer Data
The practice undermines civil rights and circumvents the Constitution’s privacy protections.www.brennancenter.org
Those laws had nothing to do with disarming Black people. Gun control in the state of California was aimed at the Black Panthers. The 30s was aimed at the Prohibition violence and the 90s a response to mass shootings.
That and the fact one party in our two-party system lost its fucking mind. This why a proposed ban failed in 2013, less than a year after Sandy Hook. We're not dealing with rational people.I know what you're getting at and wasn't arguing any of that. Just saying how the specifications pointed out in the bill are outdated based on how firearms are designed now which would make it much more difficult to get passed these days.
There are some true agents and shills on here.Bitch ass niggas don't want no smoke round here either. Lying "broke bike" ass niggas.
Nigga tried to say collapsible stock and pistol grip don't improve weapon performance. Quick, what is the almost universal build design for modern military rifles? Niggas is fugazy as fuck.
Never been in a real tactical situation myself but I have and will again done some weekend tact training before where we shoot from the back of moving vehicles and breach and enter mock buildings. Being able to collapse a stock on a rifle changes its specific field effectiveness by orders of magnitudes .
You're underestimating the capabilities of these giant corporations. Amazon pretty much owns the Internet for real. These companies have tons of resources and less restrictions than the gov't since these are private platforms.But don't think they don't have their own surveillance way more sophisticated than private companies. That article is saying the govt violated the 4th amendment? Then what is the company doing, that's crazy. But then they will say we gave those rights up when we agreed to install apps? Smh
Oh and by the way, another school in Arlington, a guy shot himself by mistake walking into the school.
Man Charged After Carrying Gun Onto Arlington Elementary Campus, Accidentally Shooting Self
A man who walked onto the campus of an Arlington elementary school Thursday morning with a loaded gun in his waistband and was injured when it accidentally went off is now facing a criminal charge, police say.www.nbcdfw.com
We agree to be commodified when we click yes on those end user agreements.You're underestimating the capabilities of these giant corporations. Amazon pretty much owns the Internet for real. These companies have tons of resources and less restrictions than the gov't since these are private platforms.
The latest:
Shooter was NOT confronted by anyone in the school. No armed security officer in the school, they don’t know why.
Took police 12 minutes to respond.
He walked in thru unlocked door, they don’t know why it was unlocked.
Absolutely. I'm guilty as anyone else for not reading that shit thoroughly but its obvious we're consenting to give up our rights.We agree to be commodified when we click yes on those end user agreements.
The latest:
Shooter was NOT confronted by anyone in the school. No armed security officer in the school, they don’t know why.
Took police 12 minutes to respond.
He walked in thru unlocked door, they don’t know why it was unlocked.