thanks for the barrera v. hamed fight.
i thoroughly enjoy watching that sorry yemeni convict get dominated.
that fight was one of the best examples of how casual sports fans get indoctrinated into popular sports myths.
as revealed during the fight 28 out of 30 dumb ass boxing "journalists" picked naseem hamed to defeat barrera. vegas oddsmakers made barrera a 3.5:1 underdog.
how could all those supposed "experts" be so foolishly wrong?
because morons get hypnotized by flash. they stupidly pick style over substance.
naseem hamed was outmatched and outclassed by a overwhelmingly superior fighter.
naseem hamed was exposed for having a feminine backhanded slapping jab. a one trick pony. an english queer with a big left hand who didn't know how to cut off the ring.
It's a lotta dickriding muphuckas out there, I didn't see no boxing threads before I put MY shit up, your boxing post is straight up WACK dude, you know who the fuck I'm talking to!
HOLD UP A MOTHER FUGGING MINUTE SIMP ASS. MY THREAD BEEN POPPING BEFORE YOURS. LIKE I TOLD YOU, YOU STOLE THIS SHIT FROM ANOTHER SITE. STOP ACTING LIKE YOU PIONEERED THIS BOXING HISTORY THREAD. JUST FOR THAT NEWBIE, YOU GETS NO LOVE UNTIL APOLOGIES GIVEN, FUCK THAT!!!
OH BY THE WAY, HERE'S MY ORIGINAL POST!!!!!! DO YOUR HOMEWORK
http://www.bgol.us/board/showthread.php?t=195311
SAD THAT MY 700TH POST HAD TO BE CATERED TO SIMP ASS NEWBIE'S
LOOK AT THE DATE!!!!!
If u feelin this post please vote for it, cuz I'ma continue doin my damm thing which is to keep beatin ya'll in the head with fights!
A fight between them would've been classic, but imo Leonard wins a 15rd decision. I'm a huge Floyd fan but if Floyd is smart Leonard was smarter, they are both fast with the edge in speed going to Floyd tho, power, Leonard mos definitely hit harder and had more heart, and Leonard fought Legends in their prime, which sadly Floyd never has done. Now these guys..........
I'm not too sure
I know you've been puttin it down on these boxing threads, but you have doubts about Mosley and Robinson??!!! That nearly stopped me cold...
Shane was a beast at lightweight...He won just one fight by decision in that weight class; every other fight was won by KO. He beat the biggest non-heavy boxing draw in history twice...Thing about him is that he is not much of a boxer as most think he is...That's why Forrest always had his number and when he gave Winky a shot at the 154 belts, he couldn't solve Wright's defense...He's still one of the best fighters today...
Sugar Ray Robinson was just the man...just watch his fights and you'd be amazed at his skill...You say that Leonard had Hearns, Hagler, and Duran....well Robinson had LaMotta, Gavilan, Basilio, and Fullmer. And back in his day they fought about as frequent as a month between fights...Shoot, you might as well question Archie Moore and his place in boxing history...
I'm an "80's baby" so I can't say that I've seen Robinson's fights, but the Bert Sugar's and Teddy Atlas' of the world will tell you how good he was...I enjoy the highlights of him, Louis, Johnson, Moore, Patterson, and Ali...Robinson may have faced some brawlers, but Basilio, Maxim, Olson, and Graziano are Hall of Famers so either way he's faced some of the best all-time...
Cotto may be faster than most give credit for, but if Mayweather faced him and beat him (which I'd think he would), then what? I think Floyd should just sit on what he has now...Floyd earned about 25 mil in one year...He shouldn't have to prove much else at the welterweight division. He's paid his dues already, beating Corrales, Castillo, De La Hoya, and Hatton...Cotto may have KO'd Judah, but that type of fight asked for one of them to get KO'd...
Cotto-Hatton is a better draw, and Williams should have fought Cotto this year since he beat who was supposed to fight Miguel in November (Margarito). If Floyd even thinks about fighting again, it won't be until June/July and it should be against Williams/Mosley.
Robinson was great no doubt, but I just can't give him credit for beating a bunch of white boys who were nowhere near his level(even if they are in the HOF). That being said I think he's important bcause he left behind the blueprint for the modern style of boxing, he passed his style of boxing to dudes like Ali, Leonard, Mayweather, De La Hoya and alot of other fighters, would he beat every welter in Leonard's era(the greatest welter era), I doubt it.
walter smith jr gets my vote.
he fought for 25 years, had over 100 KOs and many people don't know that he fought without much of his eyesight in his later years. they simply thought that is skills had diminished due to AGE and moving up in weight class.
RIP sugar ray robinson, who died in los angeles not far from where i lived, in 1989
I may look like a Cotto hater here, but I don't see how he can beat Floyd. His old style where he walks down his opponents is tailor-made for Mayweather to jab him to death, and any body shots that Cotto throws gets either blocked or slipped off...He showed that against De La Hoya, who tried to make that his game plan, and against Hatton, which is always his game plan...Shoot, even Mosley was able to nullify that in the 2nd half of the fight against Cotto, then ended up stalking him...Which to this day is the reason why I say that Mosley won that fight.
I give credit to Mayweather now because we're in an age where great fights are fairly hard to come by thanks to the Kings and DiBellas and shaws of the world...There are/were so many chances that Floyd could've fought some named fighters in the division, but if you can criticize him, then the same has to go for Roy Jones Jr...
Larry Holmes is probably one of the most underrated fighters ever mainly because he ruled the post 70s era after Ali, Frazier, Foreman, and Norton...He may have been great inside the ring, but my favorite moment of him was outside of it...
<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/m-XVCW95nHU&rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/m-XVCW95nHU&rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>
Fire Post 5 stars
Mosley nullified his power by clinching and holding, and he didn't win the rest of the fight, he was getting jabbed and counterpunched to death, so I don't see it. I mean when Floyd does what Cotto did the 2nd half of the fight, people call it "boxing", so why when Cotto does it it's running all of a sudden....
Mayweather's boxing skills don't really compare with Roy's, May got speed and reflexes but he's not really a boxer by traditional definition, May is strictly a defensive fighter, if you remove his speed, ain't much left, whereas you take a guy like J.M. Marquez and he's not fast but his boxing skills allow him to dominate dudes much faster and younger than him. Great timing can beat great speed.
To me, Cotto suprised Mosley in the first few rounds with his speed and caught him with the jab...That's why IMO Cotto won 4 of the first 6 rounds. When Shane changed his game plan in the 7th by bouncing around and moving, Cotto took a couple rounds to adjust to it...Shane had a lot more success with power punches throughout the fight. When he tagged Cotto in the 9th and backed him up, Cotto was backing up the rest of the fight, which was opposite of what he usually does. In the 2nd half of the fight, the only round that I clearly gave to Cotto was the 10th.
The perception of Cotto "running" is because of his rep of stalking down his opponents. When Mosley ended up doing that to him in the last half, that's what gave Mosley the edge in most people's view.
Remove Floyd's speed and you get B-Hop. Both of those guys (along with Toney now) have an uncanny ability to see their opponents punches and slip them to give them less power than originally intended. I can say that I have never seen a fighter have that type of ability that Floyd has...Great timing can beat great speed? That might be the case at times, but Floyd has both...He showed it against Hatton, Baldomir, and Judah (who most say is faster than Mayweather). Roy and Floyd aren't similar because in Roy's day he was more of an offensive-minded fighter than Floyd is, but Roy probably is a better counter-puncher, and with the power that he had he could follow those punches up to knock down/out his opponents...
I kind of see what you're saying that Floyd should fight the best like Oscar did, but the difference is that the main reason that Oscar fought some of the best was because he was THE attraction in boxing since 1994. It didn't matter who he fought...sure he made the decision on who he wanted to fight, but he could've fought a real life Glass Joe and still sell out Mandalay Bay, MGM Grand Garden, or the Staples Center. As far as selling tickets, you can put Oscar with Hatton in England and Calzaghe in Wales. If Floyd had more of an engaging style like De La Hoya, Trinidad, or Mayorga, more "casual" fans would be interested in going to his fights...
I really didn't want to go into this thread, because I knew if I did, I'd watch every match. But now that I have the next few days off, I will visit this thread frequently. Thank you very much.
BTW- Thanks for the Barrera/Hamed fight. Would you happed to have the two Junior Jones/Barrera fights?
I really didn't want to go into this thread, because I knew if I did, I'd watch every match. But now that I have the next few days off, I will visit this thread frequently. Thank you very much.
BTW- Thanks for the Barrera/Hamed fight. Would you happed to have the two Junior Jones/Barrera fights?
Jones vs. Trinidad - As much as I don't like RJJ, I favor him in this match due to him being able to handle the weight...Tito is jumping two weight classes and hasn't fought in two years. I really don't know if he has changed his game since then, because his style would be to Roy's liking, as he loves to couterpunch...
Taylor/Pavlik - I have Pavlik again in the rematch...Taylor has proved nothing in 6 fights as far as defense goes, his left hand is down by his waist all the time, and all that had to happen was for someone with power to continually exploit that (which Pavlik did) to finish him. Jermain had a Hall of Fame trainer in Emanuel Steward at his corner and didn't listen to him...I remember the fight against Spinks when Manny was cussin him out for not following directions. Now w/o Manny, I think Taylor may be out even sooner this time around.
I felt that Taylor knocked Pav down because Pav thought he could scrap with Taylor non-stop...Kelly dropped his guard and got caught with two good ones to set up the knockdown. Afterwards he knew to hold on to Taylor b/c Jermain didn't know how to finish...Kelly's too technically sound for Jermain and has the power (as we saw) to take him down, so that's why I favor Pavlik. Plus more contenders for the middleweight belt want Pavlik to win because they could get a better chance to fight him than Taylor, especially Winky Wright...
(Belts aren't on the line, but an undefeated Pavlik would be great for 160-lb. contenders. A win for Taylor delays the defense of the belts until July/August of 08...)
The winner of Jones/Trinidad may not fight Calzaghe if Joe does fight B-Hop next year. If that's the case, then the winner will SERIOUSLY be rooting for Calzaghe to win...B-Hop beat the crap out of Tito, and we all know about him and Jones...I really think that if Hopkins has any idea that if Jones beats Tito and he beats Joe, then there's nowhere for Roy to go other than to finally give Hopkins that rematch. Only then will I believe that Hopkins will hang it up if that happens.