Is that a rectilineal lens or a go-pro with distorting features (fish-eye) that causes the images to look concave towards the bottom point, flat a little above the bottom, and exaggerated round at the top? Some low IQ bullshit!
Now let's look at how you do this correctly with a high IQ while negating all conflicting variables.
Funny how flat tards love using the word fish eye lens while they are the only ones introducing evidence with fish eye lens while ignoring photos with rectilinear lenses that can eliminate all types of distortions.
Dude, I REALLY wish you would stop talking this shit about a rectilinear lens nigga. I'M THE ONE that first introduced the rectilinear lens into this conversation long ago when we first started this conversation.
Feb 29, 2016 - Look at what I posted.
FLAT EARTH!!!: Yes Niggas I'm Still Here... The Re-Up... Get Yo' Popcorn...
There's two of them ? :stormcloud:
www.bgol.us
Ya mans is a FRAUD, okay??? That fake ass shit is just another part of the bullshit propaganda just like the photoshopped globes, and the greenscreen ISS, the fake ass moon footage and all the other lies MASA has been caught in for years.
The video I posted is a compilation of videos where yes, SOME of the footage was done with a fish eye that created concave and convex horizons. But you ALSO see footage that was CLEARLY shot with a rectilinear lens with a completely flat horizon and a sun that locks in proximity to the horizon rather than parallaxing as it would if it were 92Ms away. And that shit ain't refraction flattening the land. Why?? Because the visibility of refraction is not as visible from high above as it would be near ground level.
So I'm sorry to burst your bubble again, but
IT'S FLAT!