Star Wars Or Star Trek?

Star Wars Or Star Trek?

  • Star Wars

    Votes: 48 43.2%
  • Star Trek

    Votes: 63 56.8%

  • Total voters
    111

kes1111

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
Which is the best (or your favorite) film series between the two?

250px-Star_Wars_Logo.svg.png

Star Wars is an American epic space opera franchise centered on a film series created by George Lucas. It depicts the adventures of various characters "a long time ago in a galaxy far, far away", mostly involving the rise and fall of Anakin Skywalker.

The first film in the series, Star Wars (later subtitled Episode IV: A New Hope), was released on May 25, 1977 by 20th Century Fox and became a worldwide pop culture phenomenon. It was followed by the similarly successful sequels The Empire Strikes Back (1980) and Return of the Jedi (1983); these three films constitute the original Star Wars trilogy. A prequel trilogy was later released between 1999 and 2005, which received a more mixed reaction from critics and fans, compared to the original trilogy. All six films were nominated for or won Academy Awards, and were commercial successes, with a combined box office revenue of $4.38 billion, making Star Wars the fifth-highest-grossing film series.The series has spawned an extensive media franchise—the Star Wars expanded universe—including books, television series,computer and video games, and comic books, resulting in significant development of the series's fictional universe. Star Wars also holds a Guinness World Records title for the "Most successful film merchandising franchise." In 2012, the total value of the Star Wars franchise was estimated at USD $30.7 billion, including box-office receipts as well as profits from their video games and DVD sales.

In 2012, The Walt Disney Company acquired Lucasfilm for $4.06 billion and announced three new Star Warsfilms, with the first film, Star Wars: The Force Awakens, was released on December 18, 2015. 20th Century Fox retains the physical distribution rights to the first two Star Wars trilogies, owning permanent rights for the original 1977 film and holding the rights to Episodes IIII, V and VI until May 2020. The Walt Disney Studios owns digital distribution rights to all the Star Wars films, excluding A New Hope

image002.jpg

The Star Trek film series is the cinematic branch of the Star Trek media franchise, which began in 1966 as a weeklytelevision series on NBC, running for three seasons until it was canceled in 1969 because of poor ratings. Reruns of the series proved to be wildly successful in syndication during the 1970s, which persuaded the series' then-owner,Paramount Pictures, to expand the franchise.

Paramount originally began work on a Star Trek feature film in 1975 after lobbying by the creator of the franchise,Gene Roddenberry. The studio scrapped the project two years later in favor of creating a television series, Star Trek: Phase II, with the original cast. However, following the huge success of Star Wars and Close Encounters of the Third Kind, Paramount changed its mind again, halting production on the television series and adapting its pilot episode into the 1979 Star Trek feature film, Star Trek: The Motion Picture. Five more films featuring the entire original cast followed. The cast of the 1987–1994 spin-off series Star Trek: The Next Generation starred in a further four films. After a 7-year hiatus, a new film was released in 2009, simply titled Star Trek, serving as a reboot to the franchise with a new cast portraying younger versions of the original series' characters. A sequel to Star Trek (2009), Star Trek Into Darkness, was released in theaters in May 2013. A second sequel, Star Trek Beyond, will be released in July 2016, which will be on the franchise's 50th anniversary.

The Star Trek films have received 15 Academy Award nominations. Star Trek (2009) won for Best Makeup and Hairstyling in 2010, and four of the previous films were nominated mainly in the areas of makeup, music, set design and sound design.

The early Star Trek films, the first to tenth film, were originally released on VHS; competitive pricing of The Wrath of Khan 's videocassette helped bolster the adoption of VHS players in households.[1] Later films were also released on LaserDisc as well. For those films that did not receive an initial DVD release, Paramount released simple one-disc versions with no special features. Later, the first ten films were released in two-disc collector's versions, with The Motion Picture and The Wrath of Khan branded as "director's cuts", followed by later box set releases. All of the films are now available on Blu-ray, digital download, streaming media andvideo on demand.
 
Last edited:

Flawless

Flawless One
BGOL Investor
the star trek movies were not that great imo, I think Star Wars would have made a good tv series.
 

praetor

Rising Star
OG Investor
As a huge Star Trek fan I would have to say Star Wars. Star Trek was always intended to be a television show. 2 hours just isn't long enough to do proper character development and tell a morality tale, all while including years worth of backstories. In a movie, as illustrated by the rebooted star trek universe that I hate, you have an action/explosions quota that you must meet. The general public who are mostly not Star Trek fans, don't have any interest in watching a movie that is like the episodes "Duet" form DS9, or "Clues", "Half A Life", "A Matter of Time" "The Inner Light", etc. from TNG.
 

ak_rep

Rising Star
Registered
Star Wars. But at this point in my life, I'd rather watch Star Trek. Damn you Star Wars for pushing that date back.:angry:
 

snark9

Cantankerous Bastid
BGOL Investor
star wars is science fantasy,
and it's becoming pretty clear that it is mostly made for kids,
and nostalgia from when adults were kids.

i prefer star trek, but it is better suited for television.
this abramsverse shlock seeks to take the science out of science fiction,
and just make star trek adventure films a la indiana jones.
 
Last edited:

geechiedan

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
Apple or Orange ?
EXACTLY!!!

The ONLY reason people keep comparing the two is because they have scifi elements..but thats about it.

The reason star trek was more "adult" and talky and there's a bit more substance to Star Trek than Star Wars has more to do with the fact that Roddenberry was able to delve deeper into character development and dynamics because he had more time and less of a budget. When you have no money you start filling in gaps with dialogue thats FILMMAKING ON THE CHEAP 101..:lol: Give Gene Roddenberry 40 million dollars and a two hour time limit and Star Trek would have been an action packed, shallow romp through space as well. Also its a bit of a false premise to compare Star Trek films and Star Wars films because Star Trek has a 79 episode back story for the characters to play off. Also Star Wars was Lucas' homage to the matinee space adventures of his youth like Buck Rogers and Flash Gordon, which is why it was done in an episodic fashion. Star Trek on the other hand was Roddenberry's critique on and example of a progressive american society.

Theres a reason why ALL of the Star Trek MOVIES are more action Special EFX packed and less talky than ANY of the tv shows..

Hell JJ Abrams is a STAR WARS ACOLYTE who just basically used star wars like premise and action with a star trek back drop..and NOT ONE TREKKIE COMPLAINED:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

And Battlestar Galactic ONLY EXISTS because of Star Wars Hype NOT Star Trek..

If the two shows where women..
melilli-amanda2.jpg

Star Trek would be the nerdy but kinda hot girl who does shit that actually contributes to society in real ways..

4e29a2707462e1819bcf47a8c928f218.jpg

Star Wars would the big titty brickhouse shaped blonde who has no real talent beyond her ass...

Take a guess who MOST people would fuck with given the chance:giggle::giggle: (even the nerds)
 
Last edited:

Varis

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
I wanna see a star trek movie based on the episode where the evil Spock had a beard
 

knightmelodic

American fruit, Afrikan root.
BGOL Investor
I'll also add that they are both entertainment, not documentaries so I'm not going to dissect them. I'm just going to enjoy them.
 

Jay_from_dade

RawStrippers&Nut N Models
Certified Pussy Poster
I never seen any of the star wars movies and only have seen the reboots to StarTrek. so I guess Startrek wins for me by default. I actually want to see the new one, not in theaters but When bgol got it i will be first to download it.
 

snark9

Cantankerous Bastid
BGOL Investor
Basic people, with short attention spans, like star wars. Star trek is for reflective people.
This fact usually doesn't bother anybody, because basic folks think being basic is winning.
 
Last edited:

CptMARVEL

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
EXACTLY!!!

The ONLY reason people keep comparing the two is because they have scifi elements..but thats about it.

The reason star trek was more "adult" and talky and there's a bit more substance to Star Trek than Star Wars has more to do with the fact that Roddenberry was able to delve deeper into character development and dynamics because he had more time and less of a budget. When you have no money you start filling in gaps with dialogue thats FILMMAKING ON THE CHEAP 101..:lol: Give Gene Roddenberry 40 million dollars and a two hour time limit and Star Trek would have been an action packed, shallow romp through space as well. Also its a bit of a false premise to compare Star Trek films and Star Wars films because Star Trek has a 79 episode back story for the characters to play off. Also Star Wars was Lucas' homage to the matinee space adventures of his youth like Buck Rogers and Flash Gordon, which is why it was done in an episodic fashion. Star Trek on the other hand was Roddenberry's critique on and example of a progressive american society.

Theres a reason why ALL of the Star Trek MOVIES are more action Special EFX packed and less talky than ANY of the tv shows..

Hell JJ Abrams is a STAR WARS ACOLYTE who just basically used star wars like premise and action with a star trek back drop..and NOT ONE TREKKIE COMPLAINED:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

And Battlestar Galactic ONLY EXISTS because of Star Wars Hype NOT Star Trek..

If the two shows where women..

67.jpg

Star Trek would be the nerdy but kinda hot girl who does shit that actually contributes to society in real ways..

4e29a2707462e1819bcf47a8c928f218.jpg

Star Wars would the big titty brickhouse shaped blonde who has no real talent beyond her ass...

Take a guess who MOST people would fuck with given the chance:giggle::giggle: (even the nerds)



BRAVO BROTHER!!!! :bravo::bravo::bravo:
You nailed this one 110% correctly....
 

TENT

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
Star Trek is the superior universe. Lets keep it real.
The IDEA of Star Wars is epic but it have never been translated well in film or tv. Ever!
 

snark9

Cantankerous Bastid
BGOL Investor
Last edited:
K

kwazdog

Guest
Star Trek is a study of the human condition in it's entirety. Each race represents an aspect of humanity.

Star Wars is an exploration of Vedic, Occult and Lost so called "Pre History" with a hint of Buddhist Philosophy. It's rumored to be based on something called the Terra Papers..

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/vida_alien/esp_vida_alien_63.htm





I'm much more of a Trekker myself. I don't care much for Star Wars.
 
K

kwazdog

Guest
Side Question:
by the way, when is star wars going to have the equivalent of captain Benjamin Sisko?
Till then, i dont understand black enthusiasm for star wars.

I saw this new documentary about the behind the scenes making of The Next Generation. Do you know that Yaphet Kotto was being seriously considered for the role of Captain Picard?!!! I was like :eek2: . That would have been some shit!!! :money:
 
Top