Stephen Curry on Finals: “I wasn’t 100 percent, but who cares?”

[BrownTurd]

Trying real hard today... but you keep swinging and missing like a motherfucker...

Keep trying though, you may get it, but right now, your troll game is a little anemic Bruh...

Try harder...

You extra sensitive. Curry stayed on the court while the Cavs celebrated to make sure he congratulated every Cavs player.

He again congratulated the Cavs during his post game and a 3rd time after the finals at one of his camps. What else do yall niggas want?

 

[IT IS WHAT IT IS]

You extra sensitive. Curry stayed on the court while the Cavs celebrated to make sure he congratulated every Cavs player.

He again congratulated the Cavs during his post game and a 3rd time after the finals at one of his camps. What else do yall niggas want?

Ok Dude... have a good day Bruh.

This is two days in a row for you though... Peace

 

[dtownsfinest]

Who's hating Steph? So, not buying what he's selling means it's hate?

I've got a lot of respect for you Bruh so I'll just leave the question at that, will keep my view of seeing men always going to that 'hating' nonsense to myself...

Come on man....the narrative to Steph has changed. Just check this site.....I don't know if its the acquisition of KD or what but two years ago Steph was everyones hero and now all of a sudden he's getting criticized for some of the most dumb shit.

You talk about not buying what he's selling......I'm not seeing him try to sell anything.

 

[BrownTurd]

"It is what it is" is arguing 4 different points in one thread.

 

[BrownTurd]

Ok Dude... have a good day Bruh.

This is two days in a row for you though... Peace

Run when you get owned

 

[AllUniverse17]

That doesn't mean the coaching staff isn't going to tailor sets to meet his skillset. That's dumb as fuck to bring him in and not use the advantages his skillset brings to your team by not creating an environment to get maximum value and usage from those skillsets. And the 40% is relevant because teams just don't win solely based on the play of their superstars. Every championship winning team wins because of their TEAM not just 2 or 3 players... You can't be serious...

I didnt say you dont need role players to win a ring.

We are talking about offensive sets.

I said you dont tailor offensive sets to your role players.

Its a pretty simple statement, Im not sure how you managed to confuse it with something else. But if you disagree with it you are free to name the teams that have done it.

Now, when we talk about maximizing Durant's potential, are you telling me that as a coach, you would prefer to ask your 3 stars to adjust to the newcomer instead of asking the newcomer to adjust to the 3 stars who won a ring for you?

 

[BrownTurd]

Come on man....the narrative to Steph has changed. Just check this site.....I don't know if its the acquisition of KD or what but two years ago Steph was everyones hero and now all of a sudden he's getting criticized for some of the most dumb shit.

You talk about not buying what he's selling......I'm not seeing him try to sell anything.

Exactly. He said he was hurt. Then dudes get all in their feelings.

 

[Helico-pterFunk]

 

[IT IS WHAT IT IS]

"It is what it is" is arguing 4 different points in one thread.

Same level of trolling weakness as your other post Dude... Pathetic ...

Keep going though Bruh, I'm done responding to you, gave you a few but you obviously struggling this weekend.

We can try this again tomorrow if your concentration is better... You are boring me

 

[IT IS WHAT IT IS]

Come on man....the narrative to Steph has changed. Just check this site.....I don't know if its the acquisition of KD or what but two years ago Steph was everyones hero and now all of a sudden he's getting criticized for some of the most dumb shit.

You talk about not buying what he's selling......I'm not seeing him try to sell anything.

My point is, I've heard other athletes interviewed in the same context, and for the most part the response was 'I was well enough to play' and it was left there. No elaboration, etc. Anyone who doesn't see what he's up to with this is not seeing shit clearly, AND, it has nothing to do with hate. If anyone was a Curry fan this season and still is is me, but I'm not so star struck that I can't call him on his bullshit either...

 

[BrownTurd]

Same level of trolling weakness as your other post Dude... Pathetic ...

Keep going though Bruh, I'm done responding to you, gave you a few but you obviously struggling this weekend.

We can try this again tomorrow if your concentration is better... You are boring me

Either you are bipolar or trolling. How are you defending Curry in one post but dissing him in another post in the same thread?

 

[smoovejazz]

He won't need to take a reduced role. His style of play supports him still maintaining his same level of importance, maybe even seeing an increase. The guy guarding him is going to have more of a direct correlation to KD than the guards. That being said, Green needs to remain a threat to sufficiently utilize KD...

I see your point, and it's valid...maybe I should have said that his role may slightly change, but he'll still be okay.

 

[IT IS WHAT IT IS]

I didnt say you dont need role players to win a ring.

We are talking about offensive sets.

I said you dont tailor offensive sets to your role players.

Its a pretty simple statement, Im not sure how you managed to confuse it with something else. But if you disagree with it you are free to name the teams that have done it.

Now, when we talk about maximizing Durant's potential, are you telling me that as a coach, you would prefer to ask your 3 stars to adjust to the newcomer instead of asking the newcomer to adjust to the 3 stars who won a ring for you?

The offensive sets also need role players to play their positions, set the appropriate screens, hit shots, etc. so your point of them being irrelevant is still inaccurate...

To your question, yes, especially with the turnaround of team players and chemistry. Adjustment doesn't mean a negative, and also, adjusting doesn't mean sacrificing your entire game. Like I said before, it's asinine to try to maintain the exact offense when you replace Barnes with KD... Silly as fuck...

 

[IT IS WHAT IT IS]

Either you are bipolar or trolling. How are you defending Curry in one post but dissing him in another post in the same thread?

You really must be slow Dude, slow as fuck or trolling! Even though I said I am through with you, I'll give you one more then I need you to get some sleep or drink some coffee or something...
Unlike a lot of you, I'm not such a stan that I can't compliment a player for their play, and also call them on their bullshit in other areas. I'm not as well versed at tea bagging like some of you. I
But I wouldn't expect you to understand that concept since the last few of our post show you are obviously either playing stupid as hell or are really stupid.

Now if you are saying I am defending him AND dissing him on the exact same issue, then you have a point. However since you can't do that, it shows you are either a troll, or stupid, I'll let you decide which one you chose to be considered as...

 

[IT IS WHAT IT IS]

I see your point, and it's valid...maybe I should have said that his role may slightly change, but he'll still be okay.

Yep... out of all of the players involved for GS I believe adding KD will be the easiest transition for Green.

 

[IT IS WHAT IT IS]

Of course, Curry and the Warriors largely denied it until after the playoffs ended.

Simple question... why admit what you denied now? So you wait until you lose and you play ass to all of a sudden come clean? FOH!!!

 

[BDR]

Westbrook wasn't on Team USA this year.

I know that I was just making a point of KD playing in 2 different settings and still scoring at a high clip

 

[Lower9Nupe]

I'm talking about when k love and Kyrie went down nupe



It would have been different

Oh I get WHY folks think it would have mattered. Truth be told the ONLY advantage I see for the Cavs last year (if they had been healthy) was maturity. That goes a long way in the playoffs. However, this year? The Warriors were more mature, better than last year and barely lost all season because of their cohesiveness. That team had the Cavaliers (at full strength) down 3-1. No team in NBA history has EVER survived that deficit. Now I ask you, what are the odds that record would have lasted THIS LONG if the teams who lost the series had their opponent a) lose a caliber of player like Green in Game 5, b) starting opposing center GONE, etc.? I'd argue there would be a few teams capable of overcoming that 3-1 if the same thing happened in their series.

I've always believed the best team will win in seven every time unless something extraordinary happens. Did something extraordinary happen in the series? Clearly the answer is yes.

Long story short history will reflect the Cavs winning. History will NOT go into the HOW they won other than to focus on the key performances. No one remembers the Celtics giving the Lakers the business up until the moment Kendrick Perkins (a defensive only player) was clobbered by Bynam. That series changed and Kobe won. He talks about that shit all the time like it was a special. Like it was a huge obstacle to overcome the Celtics. Not ONCE has he ever said (nor will he) we were getting our asses handed to us until Perkins went down. (lol)

My take? The Warriors might have added KD but it was their bench last year that helped build the Ws. That team no longer exists. If they make it to the Finals the opposing team will need a LOT of "help". Peace

 

[ScottyPiffen745]

Pretty sure somebody already said it, but I don't care:

Most of their opponents weren't 100 percent when they won the championship.

 

[dtownsfinest]

My point is, I've heard other athletes interviewed in the same context, and for the most part the response was 'I was well enough to play' and it was left there. No elaboration, etc. Anyone who doesn't see what he's up to with this is not seeing shit clearly, AND, it has nothing to do with hate. If anyone was a Curry fan this season and still is is me, but I'm not so star struck that I can't call him on his bullshit either...

What bullshit though? You think he's trying to sell bullshit by saying he was hurt but right afterwards following that up with it doesn't matter?

 

[dtownsfinest]

Exactly. He said he was hurt. Then dudes get all in their feelings.

Said he was hurt and said it doesn't matter. How is that trying sell anything? Someone needs to explain.

 

[D-TOWN REP]

Said he was hurt and said it doesn't matter. How is that trying sell anything? Someone needs to explain.

Niggas just need somebody to crucify

Ain't no excuses he lost he was hurt a lot of niggas playing hurt in the playoffs and championship he couldn't overcome that simple as that he doesn't want or need pity

I'm sure he ain't tripping they have Kevin Durant now

 

[dtownsfinest]

Niggas just need somebody to crucify

Ain't no excuses he lost he was hurt a lot of niggas playing hurt in the playoffs and championship he couldn't overcome that simple as that he doesn't want or need pity

I'm sure he ain't tripping they have Kevin Durant now

Cat done shifted from Lebron to Steph now.

Right. That' skins of my stance. If he was hurting last year alright well this year they gonna be in position to not even have to play every game. And dudes talking injuries is why they won't make it back. Man these dudes gonna be out here sitting starters every night. Hell if it was me i'd just make sure i'd have at least two of the big 4 every night.

 

[KingTaharqa]

 

[AllUniverse17]

The offensive sets also need role players to play their positions, set the appropriate screens, hit shots, etc. so your point of them being irrelevant is still inaccurate...

To your question, yes, especially with the turnaround of team players and chemistry. Adjustment doesn't mean a negative, and also, adjusting doesn't mean sacrificing your entire game. Like I said before, it's asinine to try to maintain the exact offense when you replace Barnes with KD... Silly as fuck...

You got it backwards.

GS isnt gonna change whats been wildly successful for them. It would be retarded for them to forget they just went to back to back finals and set the record for most wins with their system.

They are gonna find guys that fit their system. They wont change their system for new role players.

Durant already fits into what they do. There isnt much to adjust to. They will never tell their champions to change what they are doing RIGHT.

 

[Rudey]

He said that to ruffle some feathers.
Now everybody fall for the bait.

 

[IT IS WHAT IT IS]

What bullshit though? You think he's trying to sell bullshit by saying he was hurt but right afterwards following that up with it doesn't matter?

If it doesn't matter then why say it then?
And if it doesn't matter, why claim all through the finals it's not an issue, but then after you play like crap, and you also, then all of a sudden you were hurt?
Come on bro, really?

 

[IT IS WHAT IT IS]

He said that to ruffle some feathers.
Now everybody fall for the bait.

He plays like ass, in the team historically jokes, and he's playing games and ruffling feathers? Yakima that actually makes a hell of a lot of sense.

 

[dtownsfinest]

If it doesn't matter then why say it then?
And if it doesn't matter, why claim all through the finals it's not an issue, but then after you play like crap, and you also, then all of a sudden you were hurt?
Come on bro, really?

Did you see the context that "Quote" came from? He has never once used that as an excuse for why they lost or why the Cavs won. I don't know I guess we'll agree to disagree. You can dissect anyones quote and make it say whatever you want without hearing the context of it.

 

[Rudey]

He plays like ass, in the team historically jokes, and he's playing games and ruffling feathers? Yakima that actually makes a hell of a lot of sense.

Slow down, read and understand because I am pretty sure it was said before. My point is, he knows people care that's why he said it.

 

[LSN]

can't stop laughing @ that pic

 

[IT IS WHAT IT IS]

Slow down, read and understand because I am pretty sure it was said before. My point is, he knows people care that's why he said it.

Ok....

 

[IT IS WHAT IT IS]

Did you see the context that "Quote" came from? He has never once used that as an excuse for why they lost or why the Cavs won. I don't know I guess we'll agree to disagree. You can dissect anyones quote and make it say whatever you want without hearing the context of it.

 

[jack walsh13]

The league is different now Fam. It may get them in trouble against a few teams but overall its not going to be that big of a detriment IMO...

As far as the only one ball theory, none of these guys are need to shoot high volume type personalities! You will have Klay, Steph and KD getting between 15 to 20 shots a game, and Green can live off of 10. With the way they play, those numbers are definitely attainable, and these Dudes are focused on winning instead of personal stats...

Now, if GS had picked up Melo or somebody like that then it would have been a problem...

It's all good until it happens man. Watch.

 

[jack walsh13]

18, 21, 17, 19 FGA the last 4 seasons, he's not the same guy playing Barnes role. Now...there's only one ball & 48 minutes in a game, whose game takes a step back? I would venture to say Klay since he's the only one who doesn't handle the rock primarily. Draymond will as well, but he can affect the game in other ways.



Exactly. KD ain't gone be cool with just hanging out at the 3 PT line, getting a jumper when nothing else is open for the other all stars on the team.

Shit sounds great in early September right? Shit doesn't always work out like they suppose too on paper.