Yo Fox News looks sick. Even Charles pissed they basically lied to him as he gave his full support. And Sean interview looks like don jr copping pleas
What in the ALL OF THE FUCKS!!!!!
It's fucking public knowledge that the Russians had/have direct contact with Wikileaks and gave them the emails.
I always thought that Roger Stone was the only one in Trumps camp that had a Back channel to Wikileaks... But now Julian just fucking outed himself as being able to Contact Trump Jr.
Now the immediate question.... HOW THE FUCK LONG HAS THIS BEEN GOING ON!!!!
Holy shit!!!!! Did Julian just fuck up.....
B you completely missed the big issue... I remember last year.. when the only person in the Trump Campaign that said they had a direct "legal" backchannel to Wikileaks was Roger Stone...
But now it appears that Julian Assange has been or is able to contact Donald Trump Jr.... I didn't see a Tweet from Wikileaks on Trump Jr's timeline.. So Julian's contact would have had to be either through DM, email, or Cell phone.
How long has Julian Assange been in contact with Jr? Because this opens up an entirely different... issue...
OK I got it man I'm tired a lot to lead this Donald Trump stuff up to you guys now I've been missing a lot of points latelyB you completely missed the big issue... I remember last year.. when the only person in the Trump Campaign that said they had a direct "legal" backchannel to Wikileaks was Roger Stone...
But now it appears that Julian Assange has been or is able to contact Donald Trump Jr.... I didn't see a Tweet from Wikileaks on Trump Jr's timeline.. So Julian's contact would have had to be either through DM, email, or Cell phone.
How long has Julian Assange been in contact with Jr? Because this opens up an entirely different... issue...
Nah.. that cant be real.
OK I got it man I'm tired a lot to lead this Donald Trump stuff up to you guys now I've been missing a lot of points lately
Thing I don't understand is that if Trump didn't know anything about the meeting in June 2016, how did he know Hillary had 832 staff members and that she had 33,000 emails deleted.
Keith Olberman did a segment on this a few days ago.
Those are numbers that you just don't pull out of your ass.
That's cause you a U.K. FaggetI imagine Hillary would've readily taken anti-Trump information from Russia, North Korea, Saudi Arabia, the Church of Scientology, the devil himself etc etc etc...
I'm just not seeing significance in this. It ranks pretty low on the list of reasons Trump shouldn't be in office for me.
I imagine Hillary would've readily taken anti-Trump information from Russia, North Korea, Saudi Arabia, the Church of Scientology, the devil himself etc etc etc...
I'm just not seeing significance in this. It ranks pretty low on the list of reasons Trump shouldn't be in office for me.
He was caught by Lex posting copy and paste from stormfrontTread carefully here GameTheory. I believe it's documented or rather strongly believe that you're an avid Trump Supporter during the campinging season last year. Your comments here, thus far, in light of the significant of this resent news and it is significant, despite your conclusion, isn't helping to dispel those beliefs.
Tread carefully here GameTheory. I believe it's documented or rather strongly believe that you're an avid Trump Supporter during the campinging season last year. Your comments here, thus far, in light of the significant of this recent news and it is significant, despite your conclusion, isn't helping to dispel those beliefs.
What office does Clinton hold?Lets see....
Case 1:
A Hillary Clinton campaign cut-out hires the (former?) British intelligence agent Steele to pay money to (former?) Russian intelligence agents and high-level Kremlin employees for dirt about Donald Trump. They deliver some dirty fairy tales. The resulting dossier is peddled far and wide throughout Washington DC with the intent of damaging Trump.
Case 2:
Some lobbyist for Russian business interests contacts the Trump campaign with a promise to deliver some dirt on Hillary Clinton. She meets campaign officials but no dirt on Clinton is offered. Instead the lobbyist uses the time to lobby for the business' cause. There is no follow up.
Question: Which of the two cases stinks of "collusion with the Russians"?
As you write, "Yes, in this case the "Clinton associates", happen to be the Director of National Intelligence and the Director of the CIA along with someone high up in MI6.."
Whatever Clintonists touch transforms into...not gold.
I'm not Trump supporter and didnt support Hillary either but I think its best we see things from a different perspective and not ride on the pro clinton metropolital liberal media elites who have always used blacks for their advantage.
this shows you don't know what you are talking about...I imagine Hillary would've readily taken anti-Trump information from Russia, North Korea, Saudi Arabia, the Church of Scientology, the devil himself etc etc etc...
I'm just not seeing significance in this. It ranks pretty low on the list of reasons Trump shouldn't be in office for me.
thing is there is no smoking gun in either scenario and an army of staffers in between that will protect the principle and the exec staff - you will never have a direct line of evidence to ClintonLets see....
Case 1:
A Hillary Clinton campaign cut-out hires the (former?) British intelligence agent Steele to pay money to (former?) Russian intelligence agents and high-level Kremlin employees for dirt about Donald Trump. They deliver some dirty fairy tales. The resulting dossier is peddled far and wide throughout Washington DC with the intent of damaging Trump.
Case 2:
Some lobbyist for Russian business interests contacts the Trump campaign with a promise to deliver some dirt on Hillary Clinton. She meets campaign officials but no dirt on Clinton is offered. Instead the lobbyist uses the time to lobby for the business' cause. There is no follow up.
Question: Which of the two cases stinks of "collusion with the Russians"?
As you write, "Yes, in this case the "Clinton associates", happen to be the Director of National Intelligence and the Director of the CIA along with someone high up in MI6.."
Whatever Clintonists touch transforms into...not gold.
I'm not Trump supporter and didnt support Hillary either but I think its best we see things from a different perspective and not ride on the pro clinton metropolital liberal media elites who have always used blacks for their advantage.
Rogue Potus Staff.. saw the same shit... Julian Just outed himself and now Trump Jr is even more fucked...
Russia?So who gave the NYT the full emails of Trump junior who was then as now a private person with no government function?
So who gave the NYT the full emails of Trump junior who was then as now a private person with no government function?
Lets see....
Case 1:
A Hillary Clinton campaign cut-out hires the (former?) British intelligence agent Steele to pay money to (former?) Russian intelligence agents and high-level Kremlin employees for dirt about Donald Trump. They deliver some dirty fairy tales. The resulting dossier is peddled far and wide throughout Washington DC with the intent of damaging Trump.
Case 2:
Some lobbyist for Russian business interests contacts the Trump campaign with a promise to deliver some dirt on Hillary Clinton. She meets campaign officials but no dirt on Clinton is offered. Instead the lobbyist uses the time to lobby for the business' cause. There is no follow up.
Question: Which of the two cases stinks of "collusion with the Russians"?
As you write, "Yes, in this case the "Clinton associates", happen to be the Director of National Intelligence and the Director of the CIA along with someone high up in MI6.."
Whatever Clintonists touch transforms into...not gold.
I'm not Trump supporter and didnt support Hillary either but I think its best we see things from a different perspective and not ride on the pro clinton metropolital liberal media elites who have always used blacks for their advantage.
Rogue Potus Staff.. saw the same shit... Julian Just outed himself and now Trump Jr is even more fucked...