Trump’s Son Met With Russian Lawyer After Being Promised Damaging Information on Clinton

fonzerrillii

BGOL Elite Poster
Platinum Member
Also Trump Jr attorney just implied that prior to the email leak... Trump jr was prepared to make a statement detailing the events of the meeting...

Obviously that didn't happen.. they put out that thin statement...

So did Trump Jr's lawyer just imply that they were prepared to fully explain the events yet "someone" put the clamps on that.....

This sounds like another attempted coverup...
 

ViCiouS

Rising Star
BGOL Patreon Investor
Your methodology to derive your opinion might be interesting to some folks.

I only deal in facts.

You haven't presented one yet.

Please stop responding to me until you can show where democratic voters are misinformed like republicans are.

NOTHING supports that idea.

Proof: Republicans Really Are Dumber Than Democrats

:rolleyes: - I see you too are in the bubble...

http://www.salon.com/2017/04/26/are...id-a-new-poll-suggests-the-answer-may-be-yes/
Political scientists and other researchers have repeatedly documented that the American public does not have a sophisticated knowledge on political matters. The average American also does not use a coherent and consistent political ideology to make voting decisions. As Larry Bartels and Christopher Achen demonstrate in their new book “Democracy for Realists: Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government,” Americans have identities and values that elites manipulate, which voters in turn use to process information — however incorrectly...

...Yale historian Timothy Snyder has argued that a democracy has about one year to reverse course if it has succumbed to fascism and authoritarianism. America’s civic literacy crisis may mean that the country has even less time than Snyder’s prediction suggests.


http://foreignpolicy.com/2016/11/10...s-trump-clinton-election-republican-democrat/
...Most voters are ignorant or misinformed because the costs to them of acquiring political information greatly exceed the potential benefits. They can afford to indulge silly, false, delusional beliefs — precisely because such beliefs cost them nothing. After all, the chances that any individual vote will decide the election is vanishingly small. As a result, individual voters tend to vote expressively, to show their commitment to their worldview and team. Voting is more like doing the wave at a sports game than it is like choosing policy...

...In fact, average Americans have completed more schooling now than 60 years ago, but they’ve remained equally ignorant about politics even as their education levels rose. More fundamentally, to blame the schools is to misunderstand why citizens know so little. The schools teach them most of what they need to know to vote well. But they forget it because the information is not useful. And the reason it is not useful is because their individual votes make no difference...

...That’s not to say that high-information voters tend to favor the Democrats’ politics. In fact, high-information voters tend to have policy preferences that cut across party lines. For instance, high-information voters are pro-free trade, pro-immigration, in favor of criminal justice reform, wish to raise taxes to offset the deficit, anti-war, pro-gay rights, and skeptical that the welfare state can solve all our problems...

...Trump’s victory is the victory of the uninformed. But, to be fair, Clinton’s victory would also have been. Democracy is the rule of the people, but the people are in many ways unfit to rule.
 

BigDaddyBuk

still not dizzy.
Platinum Member
:rolleyes: - I see you too are in the bubble...

http://www.salon.com/2017/04/26/are...id-a-new-poll-suggests-the-answer-may-be-yes/
Political scientists and other researchers have repeatedly documented that the American public does not have a sophisticated knowledge on political matters. The average American also does not use a coherent and consistent political ideology to make voting decisions. As Larry Bartels and Christopher Achen demonstrate in their new book “Democracy for Realists: Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government,” Americans have identities and values that elites manipulate, which voters in turn use to process information — however incorrectly...

...Yale historian Timothy Snyder has argued that a democracy has about one year to reverse course if it has succumbed to fascism and authoritarianism. America’s civic literacy crisis may mean that the country has even less time than Snyder’s prediction suggests.


http://foreignpolicy.com/2016/11/10...s-trump-clinton-election-republican-democrat/
...Most voters are ignorant or misinformed because the costs to them of acquiring political information greatly exceed the potential benefits. They can afford to indulge silly, false, delusional beliefs — precisely because such beliefs cost them nothing. After all, the chances that any individual vote will decide the election is vanishingly small. As a result, individual voters tend to vote expressively, to show their commitment to their worldview and team. Voting is more like doing the wave at a sports game than it is like choosing policy...

...In fact, average Americans have completed more schooling now than 60 years ago, but they’ve remained equally ignorant about politics even as their education levels rose. More fundamentally, to blame the schools is to misunderstand why citizens know so little. The schools teach them most of what they need to know to vote well. But they forget it because the information is not useful. And the reason it is not useful is because their individual votes make no difference...

...That’s not to say that high-information voters tend to favor the Democrats’ politics. In fact, high-information voters tend to have policy preferences that cut across party lines. For instance, high-information voters are pro-free trade, pro-immigration, in favor of criminal justice reform, wish to raise taxes to offset the deficit, anti-war, pro-gay rights, and skeptical that the welfare state can solve all our problems...

...Trump’s victory is the victory of the uninformed. But, to be fair, Clinton’s victory would also have been. Democracy is the rule of the people, but the people are in many ways unfit to rule.
You are amazingly dishonest for posting those articles.

The first one said republicans are stupid and made no mention of democrats being uninformed AT ALL.

It actually contradicted your stance.

The second article didn't speak to the intelligence of voters AT ALL. It presents how authoritarian regimes begin.

The third IS A FUCKING OPINION PIECE! it IS NOT a scientific study and does not present information as such. its a guy who believes voters are ignorant even while presenting information about HIGHLY INFORMED VOTERS.

You mustve thought i wouldnt read the articles. That's insulting. Please do not respond to me as at this point all you're doing is trolling.
 

ViCiouS

Rising Star
BGOL Patreon Investor
You are amazingly dishonest for posting those articles.

The first one said republicans are stupid and made no mention of democrats being uninformed AT ALL.

It actually contradicted your stance.

The second article didn't speak to the intelligence of voters AT ALL. It presents how authoritarian regimes begin.

The third IS A FUCKING OPINION PIECE! it IS NOT a scientific study and does not present information as such. its a guy who believes voters are ignorant even while presenting information about HIGHLY INFORMED VOTERS.

You mustve thought i wouldnt read the articles. That's insulting. Please do not respond to me as at this point all you're doing is trolling.
:lol:

dude just admit you skimmed through both excerpts not truly reading or comprehending-

I only posted 2 articles not 3


the only possibility I can imagine is you assumed the link for a book was another article and its unlikely you read the entire book referenced in the time since I posted - but please correct me if I'm wrong

so lets revisit -who is being dishonest here?

maybe try actually reading the excepts posted or feel free to read both articles in their entirety...
 

darth frosty

Dark Lord of the Sith
BGOL Investor
Sadly, there are stories like that all the time. Hell, I know some local black churches where the members are terrified of sending their kids off to college. Mainly, because their kids may end up questioning what they've been taught by the church.

That sounds like the Republican Party.
Or jehovah's witnesses, these ass backwards religions don't want there adherents educated cause than they will see and reason thru the lies of religion.
 

tical

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
Or jehovah's witnesses, these ass backwards religions don't want there adherents educated cause than they will see and reason thru the lies of religion.

Obviously, that's the great fear. I've always maintained that's the ultimate "faith" in one's belief. Does it hold up to challenges and scrutiny? Moreover, by "protecting" it from such challenges it tells me what you really think of your faith and moreso, what you think of the "adversary."
 

ViCiouS

Rising Star
BGOL Patreon Investor
huh? are you seeing the word is that there were 10 people at the meeting?
no - I'm saying my instinct is at least 2 more people were in the meeting...

reasoning:
These guys have a very bad habit of showing the truth in their lies (secret service...)

worse yet - EVERY fucking russian that we know of in that meeting so far, has met worked partied and taken pictures with Trump sr. prior to the meeting.

Trump is on video doing a working dinner with at least 3 of the meeting attendees while putting together the Miss Universe Moscow...
 

grownazzblakman

Rising Star
Platinum Member
"People meet to discuss adoptions everyday, B."
^^ This quote deserves an image Assist. :yes::D

2cqfsky.jpg


:lol::roflmao::roflmao2::lol:
 
Last edited:

BigDaddyBuk

still not dizzy.
Platinum Member
:lol:

dude just admit you skimmed through both excerpts not truly reading or comprehending-

I only posted 2 articles not 3


the only possibility I can imagine is you assumed the link for a book was another article and its unlikely you read the entire book referenced in the time since I posted - but please correct me if I'm wrong

so lets revisit -who is being dishonest here?

maybe try actually reading the excepts posted or feel free to read both articles in their entirety...
You're so full of shit you don't even know you posted 3 articles???

Dumb motherfucker hit your own links!

http://www.salon.com/2017/04/26/are...id-a-new-poll-suggests-the-answer-may-be-yes/

http://www.alternet.org/activism/if-we-dont-act-now-fascism-will-be-our-doorstep-says-yale-historian

http://foreignpolicy.com/2016/11/10...s-trump-clinton-election-republican-democrat/



Cot damn!
 

ViCiouS

Rising Star
BGOL Patreon Investor
the 2nd link (alternet.org) was a cited reference contained in one of the articles
 
Last edited:

BigDaddyBuk

still not dizzy.
Platinum Member
the 2nd link (alternet.org) was a cited reference contained in one of the articles
NO it WAS NOT. Why are you lying???

The second link does not appear in the first or third linked articles at all. I READ THEM.

So at this point: you lied about democrats being as dumb as republicans...you ain't posted shit to support your position...you posted articles that contradicted your position and or had nothing to do with your position, then didn't realize you posted links to 3 different articles, then LIED about that saying the second link was in one of the others.

:hmm:

I say this with all due respect: nigga hush.
 

fonzerrillii

BGOL Elite Poster
Platinum Member


Hold the fuck up.. this dude is also from Russia and is involved in Real Estate.....

Why the fuck would this dude be here..... Mainly to see if Trumps people would ease the sanctions on the Real Estate held by the US Government.
 
Top