Oh shit... we can confirm that there was an 8th person at the meeting.
CNN
http://www.cnn.com/2017/07/17/politics/donald-trump-jr-agalarov/index.html
how in the holy fuck is he not in JAIL. lying motherfucker
Oh shit... we can confirm that there was an 8th person at the meeting.
CNN
http://www.cnn.com/2017/07/17/politics/donald-trump-jr-agalarov/index.html
Your methodology to derive your opinion might be interesting to some folks.
I only deal in facts.
You haven't presented one yet.
Please stop responding to me until you can show where democratic voters are misinformed like republicans are.
NOTHING supports that idea.
Proof: Republicans Really Are Dumber Than Democrats
You are amazingly dishonest for posting those articles.- I see you too are in the bubble...
http://www.salon.com/2017/04/26/are...id-a-new-poll-suggests-the-answer-may-be-yes/
Political scientists and other researchers have repeatedly documented that the American public does not have a sophisticated knowledge on political matters. The average American also does not use a coherent and consistent political ideology to make voting decisions. As Larry Bartels and Christopher Achen demonstrate in their new book “Democracy for Realists: Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government,” Americans have identities and values that elites manipulate, which voters in turn use to process information — however incorrectly...
...Yale historian Timothy Snyder has argued that a democracy has about one year to reverse course if it has succumbed to fascism and authoritarianism. America’s civic literacy crisis may mean that the country has even less time than Snyder’s prediction suggests.
http://foreignpolicy.com/2016/11/10...s-trump-clinton-election-republican-democrat/
...Most voters are ignorant or misinformed because the costs to them of acquiring political information greatly exceed the potential benefits. They can afford to indulge silly, false, delusional beliefs — precisely because such beliefs cost them nothing. After all, the chances that any individual vote will decide the election is vanishingly small. As a result, individual voters tend to vote expressively, to show their commitment to their worldview and team. Voting is more like doing the wave at a sports game than it is like choosing policy...
...In fact, average Americans have completed more schooling now than 60 years ago, but they’ve remained equally ignorant about politics even as their education levels rose. More fundamentally, to blame the schools is to misunderstand why citizens know so little. The schools teach them most of what they need to know to vote well. But they forget it because the information is not useful. And the reason it is not useful is because their individual votes make no difference...
...That’s not to say that high-information voters tend to favor the Democrats’ politics. In fact, high-information voters tend to have policy preferences that cut across party lines. For instance, high-information voters are pro-free trade, pro-immigration, in favor of criminal justice reform, wish to raise taxes to offset the deficit, anti-war, pro-gay rights, and skeptical that the welfare state can solve all our problems...
...Trump’s victory is the victory of the uninformed. But, to be fair, Clinton’s victory would also have been. Democracy is the rule of the people, but the people are in many ways unfit to rule.
You are amazingly dishonest for posting those articles.
The first one said republicans are stupid and made no mention of democrats being uninformed AT ALL.
It actually contradicted your stance.
The second article didn't speak to the intelligence of voters AT ALL. It presents how authoritarian regimes begin.
The third IS A FUCKING OPINION PIECE! it IS NOT a scientific study and does not present information as such. its a guy who believes voters are ignorant even while presenting information about HIGHLY INFORMED VOTERS.
You mustve thought i wouldnt read the articles. That's insulting. Please do not respond to me as at this point all you're doing is trolling.
i think u meant "ORPHAN ADOPTION" the DRUMPFS r now humanitarians!I mean.... 3 of the highest ranking people in Trumps campaign all took the fucking time to sit down in a meeting and speak with a Russian Lawyer just for Opposition research.
Sadly, there are stories like that all the time. Hell, I know some local black churches where the members are terrified of sending their kids off to college. Mainly, because their kids may end up questioning what they've been taught by the church.
Or jehovah's witnesses, these ass backwards religions don't want there adherents educated cause than they will see and reason thru the lies of religion.That sounds like the Republican Party.
Or jehovah's witnesses, these ass backwards religions don't want there adherents educated cause than they will see and reason thru the lies of religion.
"People meet to discuss adoptions everyday, B."2 more coming...
2 more coming...
no - I'm saying my instinct is at least 2 more people were in the meeting...huh? are you seeing the word is that there were 10 people at the meeting?
2 more?2 more coming...
my prediction2 more?
^^ This quote deserves an image Assist."People meet to discuss adoptions everyday, B."
Hey 45% for his voters is actually a higher number then I thought it would beOnly 45% of Trump voters believe Don Jr. met with the Russians, after Junior admitted it
And 32% say it didn’t happen at all
Cacs are something else
Not surprised. Because those same Trump supporters do not believe in facts.Only 45% of Trump voters believe Don Jr. met with the Russians, after Junior admitted it
And 32% say it didn’t happen at all
Cacs are something else
You're so full of shit you don't even know you posted 3 articles???
dude just admit you skimmed through both excerpts not truly reading or comprehending-
I only posted 2 articles not 3
the only possibility I can imagine is you assumed the link for a book was another article and its unlikely you read the entire book referenced in the time since I posted - but please correct me if I'm wrong
so lets revisit -who is being dishonest here?
maybe try actually reading the excepts posted or feel free to read both articles in their entirety...
the 2nd link (alternet.org) was a cited reference contained in one of the articlesYou're so full of shit you don't even know you posted 3 articles???
Dumb motherfucker hit your own links!
http://www.salon.com/2017/04/26/are...id-a-new-poll-suggests-the-answer-may-be-yes/
http://www.alternet.org/activism/if-we-dont-act-now-fascism-will-be-our-doorstep-says-yale-historian
http://foreignpolicy.com/2016/11/10...s-trump-clinton-election-republican-democrat/
Cot damn!
this^^^^^ This quote deserves an image Assist.
It's a deal or that guy is a double agent. I really think they have audio from that meeting somewherewhy would they cooperate?
why would they cooperate?
NO it WAS NOT. Why are you lying???the 2nd link (alternet.org) was a cited reference contained in one of the articles
Oh shit new meme... Repubs... Jumping the track..