Nah next week something IS going to happen to him..and MAGAites everywhere will riotVerdict: I bet two jurors let him off. One juror is too easy. This is America, so at least two see zero wrong with anything he did.
Oh yes, Miss Cannon, please dismiss this case please do that…… people please look at the video you see why I want her to dismiss this case.
^^^^^^But if he runs and could very well win. Then the outcomes are pointless while he’s in office.
OK, the DOJ are finally putting their foot down somewhat
this is not on his channelDo you have a better source homie?
its a tremendously strong case.I have no love or Trump or his stans, but the current trial case is weak and never should have been brought.
That must be why he kept trying to stall and throw it outI have no love or Trump or his stans, but the current trial case is weak and never should have been brought.
Extremely strongits a tremendously strong case.
Based on what? What Trump told you? FOHI have no love or Trump or his stans, but the current trial case is weak and never should have been brought.
Yep Amber stepped into it right now and it’s going to be very hard for her to get out of this crap. she is a fucking airhead. I felt sorry for her at one point after the Kanye West debacle but right now I do not feel sorry for her anymore and I still hate Kanye West
OK, the DOJ are finally putting their foot down somewhat
Based on the fact that they have to prove the hush money payment was made in furtherance of the campaign. There’s a reasonable defense that one can make to a jury that the money was paid because he didn’t want his wife to know he was screwing a hooker. Or the money was paid because he didn’t want his children to know he was screwing a hooker. Or the money was paid because he didn’t want to be embarrassed in front of the World, knowing he was screwing a hooker. There are so many other reasons for making the payment that reasonable doubt is everywhere. The only thing they have to rest their hat on with regard to the payment being made in furtherance of the campaign is Cohen who made an absolute horrible witness.Based on what? What Trump told you? FOH
the prosecution showed how the payment reimbursement method to Cohen was illegal.Based on the fact that they have to prove the hush money payment was made in furtherance of the campaign. There’s a reasonable defense that one can make to a jury that the money was paid because he didn’t want his wife to know he was screwing a hooker. Or the money was paid because he didn’t want his children to know he was screwing a hooker. Or the money was paid because he didn’t want to be embarrassed in front of the World, knowing he was screwing a hooker. There are so many other reasons for making the payment that reasonable doubt is everywhere. The only thing they have to rest their hat on with regard to the payment being made in furtherance of the campaign is Cohen who made an absolute horrible witness.
That we are even still considering the chance that he could win is the most disappointing thing I can think of at the moment.Maybe, maybe not! Seems the biggest thing with all of these cases and the ones pending is assuming Trump runs and loses then he has no where to hide pending the outcome of these cases.
But if he runs and could very well win. Then the outcomes are pointless while he’s in office.
Based on the fact that they have to prove the hush money payment was made in furtherance of the campaign. There’s a reasonable defense that one can make to a jury that the money was paid because he didn’t want his wife to know he was screwing a hooker. Or the money was paid because he didn’t want his children to know he was screwing a hooker. Or the money was paid because he didn’t want to be embarrassed in front of the World, knowing he was screwing a hooker. There are so many other reasons for making the payment that reasonable doubt is everywhere. The only thing they have to rest their hat on with regard to the payment being made in furtherance of the campaign is Cohen who made an absolute horrible witness.
If ya'll dont stop trying to jinx everything..I have no love or Trump or his stans, but the current trial case is weak and never should have been brought.
Plus Don Jr referred to the jury as a bunch clowns recently.the prosecution showed how the payment reimbursement method to Cohen was illegal.
they showed how records were falsified.
they presented a squeaky clean witness who testified that the payment was exclusively for swinging the 2016 election.
the jury doesnt like how Trump is sleeping and farting in court.
what trial have you been following?
Jury will be like "When your daddy is found guilty by us we'll see who the clowns are.."Plus Don Jr referred to the jury as a bunch clowns recently.
No one is watching the trial unless you are in the courtroom. I listen a little to CNN on my commute, but mostly listen to audio books.the prosecution showed how the payment reimbursement method to Cohen was illegal.
they showed how records were falsified.
they presented a squeaky clean witness who testified that the payment was exclusively for swinging the 2016 election.
the jury doesnt like how Trump is sleeping and farting in court.
what trial have you been following?
If ya'll dont stop trying to jinx everything..
Watching a trial is not limited to seeing it unfold before your eyes. Following a trial is the same as watching it.No one is watching the trial unless you are in the courtroom. I listen a little to CNN on my commute, but mostly listen to audio books.
From what I have heard, falsifying records is not enough. Falsifying the record has to be for the purpose of concealing or furthering another crime. The other crime in this case is a Federal campaign crime of failing to report a campaign expense.
What expense? The expense of making a hush money payment IN FURTHERANCE OF THE CAMPAIGN because if it was spent in furtherance of the campaign then it must be reported as a campaign expense, which it was not.
I didn't hear about this witness. "they presented a squeaky clean witness who testified that the payment was exclusively for swinging the 2016 election."
Who was that?
No one is watching the trial unless you are in the courtroom. I listen a little to CNN on my commute, but mostly listen to audio books.
From what I have heard, falsifying records is not enough. Falsifying the record has to be for the purpose of concealing or furthering another crime. The other crime in this case is a Federal campaign crime of failing to report a campaign expense.
What expense? The expense of making a hush money payment IN FURTHERANCE OF THE CAMPAIGN because if it was spent in furtherance of the campaign then it must be reported as a campaign expense, which it was not.
I didn't hear about this witness. "they presented a squeaky clean witness who testified that the payment was exclusively for swinging the 2016 election."
Who was that?
Watching a trial is not limited to seeing it unfold before your eyes. Following a trial is the same as watching it.
Falsifying records is not enough on its own. But falsifying them while trying to swing an election is part of the criminal act.
That third paragraph was gobbledegook. I dont even know how to address it.
If you haven't heard about Hope Hicks im questioning your veracity, mayne.