Trump supporters behaving like the bags of ass that they are
- Thread starter PliggaNease
- Start date
FBI Most Wanted
January 6, 2021 Rioters
Capitol Violence Images
www.fbi.gov
www.fbi.gov
Click Above Links For More Images/Videos Of These Idiots
January 6, 2021 Rioters
Capitol Violence Images
Capitol Violence Images | Federal Bureau of Investigation
If you have any information on the individuals pictured below, please call 1-800-CALL-FBI or submit a tip online at tips.fbi.gov.
www.fbi.gov
Capitol Violence | Federal Bureau of Investigation
The FBI is seeking to identify individuals involved in the violent activities that occurred at the U.S. Capitol and surrounding areas on January 6, 2021. View photos and related information here. If you have any information to provide, visit tips.fbi.gov or call 1-800-CALL-FBI.
www.fbi.gov
Click Above Links For More Images/Videos Of These Idiots
Trump has indefinitely delayed his Jan. 6 criminal trial. Hundreds of his supporters haven't been so lucky.
It’s unclear when — or if — former President Donald Trump will go to trial on Jan. 6 charges, but many of his supporters are facing the consequences of actions they say he directed.
By Ryan J. Reilly
March 20, 2024
www.nbcnews.com
It’s unclear when — or if — former President Donald Trump will go to trial on Jan. 6 charges, but many of his supporters are facing the consequences of actions they say he directed.
By Ryan J. Reilly
March 20, 2024
Trump has indefinitely delayed his Jan. 6 criminal trial. Hundreds of his supporters haven't been so lucky.
It’s unclear when — or if — former President Donald Trump will go to trial on Jan. 6 charges, but many of his supporters are facing the consequences of actions they say he directed.
‘NCIS,’ ‘Shameless’ Actor Nolan Freeman Arrested For Allegedly Storming The Capitol On January 6
Freeman, who had bit parts on Shameless, The Rookie and more, allegedly crawled through a window into the Capitol as the 2020 election was being certified inside.
deadline.com
Kyle Rittenhouse Did So Poorly on USMC Entrance Exam That He’s ‘PERMANENTLY’ Banned From Applying Again
Indeed, he was “far below” what they required. Don’t breathe too deeply, many of us wouldn’t be what they’re looking for either. That’s a good thing. Our services are in good shape because they get some of the best people. But Kyle was so far below USMC requirements that he was banned from even APPLYING again. That’s pretty bad…for Kyle. And good for the United States.
Kyle Rittenhouse Did So Poorly on USMC Entrance Exam That He's 'PERMANENTLY' Banned From Applying Again
Well, one thing we know, the U.S. Marine Corps is not looking for homicidal miscreants. Actually, we knew that already. If you qualify for any of the United States military services, you’re doing better than most. But Kyle Rittenhouse isn’t better than most. At the very least, he is not...
Kyle Rittenhouse Did So Poorly on USMC Entrance Exam That He’s ‘PERMANENTLY’ Banned From Applying Again
Indeed, he was “far below” what they required. Don’t breathe too deeply, many of us wouldn’t be what they’re looking for either. That’s a good thing. Our services are in good shape because they get some of the best people. But Kyle was so far below USMC requirements that he was banned from even APPLYING again. That’s pretty bad…for Kyle. And good for the United States.
Kyle Rittenhouse Did So Poorly on USMC Entrance Exam That He's 'PERMANENTLY' Banned From Applying Again
Well, one thing we know, the U.S. Marine Corps is not looking for homicidal miscreants. Actually, we knew that already. If you qualify for any of the United States military services, you’re doing better than most. But Kyle Rittenhouse isn’t better than most. At the very least, he is not...www.politicalflare.com
Kyle Rittenhouse Did So Poorly on USMC Entrance Exam That He’s ‘PERMANENTLY’ Banned From Applying Again
Indeed, he was “far below” what they required. Don’t breathe too deeply, many of us wouldn’t be what they’re looking for either. That’s a good thing. Our services are in good shape because they get some of the best people. But Kyle was so far below USMC requirements that he was banned from even APPLYING again. That’s pretty bad…for Kyle. And good for the United States.
Kyle Rittenhouse Did So Poorly on USMC Entrance Exam That He's 'PERMANENTLY' Banned From Applying Again
Well, one thing we know, the U.S. Marine Corps is not looking for homicidal miscreants. Actually, we knew that already. If you qualify for any of the United States military services, you’re doing better than most. But Kyle Rittenhouse isn’t better than most. At the very least, he is not...
Last edited:
Colorado Springs-area resident found guilty on all charges in Capitol breach trial in D.C.
After a lengthy deliberation that’s been rare for Capitol breach cases, Falcon resident Rebecca Lavrenz, known on social media as the “J6 Praying Grandma,” was convicted on all four federal misdemeanor charges for her participation in the Jan. 6, 2021, protest of the 2020 presidential election results in Washington, D.C.
By Debbie Kelley
April 5, 2024
Rebecca seen in US Capitol
Rebecca Lavrenze
After a lengthy deliberation that’s been rare for Capitol breach cases, Falcon resident Rebecca Lavrenz, known on social media as the “J6 Praying Grandma,” was convicted on all four federal misdemeanor charges for her participation in the Jan. 6, 2021, protest of the 2020 presidential election results in Washington, D.C.
By Debbie Kelley
April 5, 2024
Rebecca seen in US Capitol
Rebecca Lavrenze
Marjorie Taylor Greene’s Boyfriend Says Liberal Women Are the Ugliest He’s Ever Seen, ‘They Look Like Men!’
Marjorie Taylor Greene’s current boyfriend is Brian Glenn, and some people believe he is using their relationship to further a career in MAGA broadcasting. Glenn had an interesting take on the attractiveness of liberal women.
Obviously this is just so incredibly sexist, but what else would you expect from a MAGA, especially one who dates someone as horrible as MTG.
Glenn said, “Liberal women [indecipherable] are the ugliest women I’ve ever seen… ”
Let’s just stop there. In the last election, then-President Donald Trump received 74 million votes, and current President Biden received 81 million votes. It seems awfully ridiculous to say that either side has a monopoly on “the ugliest or most gorgeous women,” and that’s without even having to bring up some of the beautiful liberal women.
Marjorie Taylor Greene's Boyfriend Says Liberal Women Are the Ugliest He's Ever Seen, 'They Look Like Men!'
The danger in stereotypes arose again today on Right Side Broadcast News prior to former President Trump’s latest rally. Marjorie Taylor Greene’s current boyfriend is Brian Glenn, and some people believe he is using their relationship to further a career in MAGA broadcasting. Glenn had an...
Boebert’s Son Tells Court He Can’t Find an Attorney in His Price Range
Tyler Boebert has reportedly been having issues finding a lawyer to represent him in a case involving a string of crimes he allegedly committed in the Colorado district represented by his mother, Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-CO). Tyler, 18, faces 14 charges in the alleged February crime spree, including three felony counts of criminal possession of identity documents. He appeared solo and “looking extra spiffy” in Garfield County court on Thursday, according to a report by Denver outlet Westword. “We are working to hire an attorney, but it’s just been kind of hard with the prices,” Tyler told the judge. “Worst case scenario, if we can’t get something figured out with the lawyer then we’re going to apply for a public defender or whatever works best for me.” The judge advised Tyler that it was “a good idea” to apply for a public defender even as he continues to search for private representation, according to Westword. The 18-year-old was arrested on Feb. 28 after a “string of vehicle trespass and property thefts” in Rifle, Colorado just over a week earlier, police said at the time.
Lauren Boebert’s Son Is Having Trouble Affording an Attorney
Tyler Boebert appeared in court on Thursday over a crime spree he allegedly carried out in Rifle, Colorado earlier this year.
www.thedailybeast.com
He's dating the most manly woman in congress 
.
.
Marjorie Taylor Greene’s Boyfriend Says Liberal Women Are the Ugliest He’s Ever Seen, ‘They Look Like Men!’
Marjorie Taylor Greene’s current boyfriend is Brian Glenn, and some people believe he is using their relationship to further a career in MAGA broadcasting. Glenn had an interesting take on the attractiveness of liberal women.
Obviously this is just so incredibly sexist, but what else would you expect from a MAGA, especially one who dates someone as horrible as MTG.
Glenn said, “Liberal women [indecipherable] are the ugliest women I’ve ever seen… ”
Let’s just stop there. In the last election, then-President Donald Trump received 74 million votes, and current President Biden received 81 million votes. It seems awfully ridiculous to say that either side has a monopoly on “the ugliest or most gorgeous women,” and that’s without even having to bring up some of the beautiful liberal women.
Marjorie Taylor Greene's Boyfriend Says Liberal Women Are the Ugliest He's Ever Seen, 'They Look Like Men!'
The danger in stereotypes arose again today on Right Side Broadcast News prior to former President Trump’s latest rally. Marjorie Taylor Greene’s current boyfriend is Brian Glenn, and some people believe he is using their relationship to further a career in MAGA broadcasting. Glenn had an...
Last edited:
Ole 3 ToesHe's dating the most manly woman I'm congress
.
Former Capitol Police officer warns that ‘nothing is preventing’ another Jan. 6
“Accountability serves two purposes,” Dunn, who testified before the House select committee investigating the attack on the Capitol, said during his Saturday appearance on MSNBC’s “The Weekend.”
BY FILIP TIMOTIJA
04/06/24
Former U.S. Capitol Police officer Harry Dunn*
“Accountability serves two purposes,” Dunn, who testified before the House select committee investigating the attack on the Capitol, said during his Saturday appearance on MSNBC’s “The Weekend.”
BY FILIP TIMOTIJA
04/06/24
Former Capitol Police officer warns that ‘nothing is preventing’ another Jan. 6
Former U.S. Capitol Police officer Harry Dunn warned that “nothing is preventing” another Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol since there has not been accountability “at the highest level.” “Accou…
thehill.com
Former U.S. Capitol Police officer Harry Dunn*
‘Whose house?’ Congress’ house, appeals court rules, rejecting Jan. 6 defendant’s challenge
The ruling upholds a statute that criminalizes “parading, picketing or demonstrating in a Capitol building.”
KYLE CHENEY and JOSH GERSTEIN
04/09/2024
When John Nassif surged into the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, he was among the hundreds chanting “Whose house? Our house!”
But that’s not exactly true, a federal appeals court countered Tuesday, rejecting Nassif’s challenge to his conviction for “demonstrating” inside the Capitol and ruling that the building itself — as opposed to the spacious parkland outside — is not legally a “public forum” for protest activity.
The ruling by a three-judge panel of the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals upholds a statute that criminalizes “parading, picketing or demonstrating in a Capitol building,” a law that has been used against hundreds of Jan. 6 defendants who breached the building that day.
“The record before us contains no evidence that Congress intended to open any portion of the Capitol buildings as a public forum for assembly and discourse,” the panel wrote in a unanimous 27-page ruling.
“To be sure, expressive activity by people other than members and staff happens every day in the Capitol buildings—in constituent meetings, lobbying sessions, committee hearings, and the like,” the judges continued. “But the communications that take place in the Capitol are typically ‘scheduled and controlled by Senators or Representatives, and they may or may not be open to observation or (less frequently) participation by the public.’”
The ruling is a victory for the Justice Department amid a string of challenges and setbacks related to the statutes it has deployed against Jan. 6 defendants. The Supreme Court is set to hear arguments next week in a case that could upend hundreds of Jan. 6 felony prosecutions for obstructing Congress’ proceedings that day, and several federal district court judges have recently rejected prosecutors’ view of another key misdemeanor charge: entering or remaining on the restricted grounds of the Capitol.
Nassif was convicted in 2022 of that charge — as well as three other misdemeanors — for joining the mob that breached the building, and he completed his seven-month sentence in January.
Nassif, 57, of Winter Springs, Florida, argued that the law prohibiting parading and picketing was unconstitutional because the Capitol building, including its historic rotunda, is traditionally open to the public and therefore cannot significantly restrict demonstration activity. But the court rejected that contention, concluding that because the building is actually Congress’ workplace — and was designed primarily for legislating — Congress is well within its power to prohibit activity that might disrupt its job.
“Inviting myriad parades, demonstrations, and pickets inside the Capitol buildings would disrupt the very legislative process that the buildings are designed to accommodate,” Judge Cornelia Pillard wrote for the three-judge panel.
Supporters of President Donald Trump climb the west wall of the the U.S. Capitol in Washington as they try to storm the building on Jan. 6, 2021.
All three judges who heard the appeal were appointed by Democratic presidents: Pillard was picked by Barack Obama, and Bradley Garcia and Michelle Childs were appointed by President Joe Biden.
Pillard noted that entry to the Capitol is “strictly regulated” and that members of the public typically must reserve a tour and face security screening before entering. Those restrictions, the court said, underscore that the Capitol is not “generally open for use by members of the public to voice whatever concerns they may have — much less to use for protests, pickets, or demonstrations.”
The appeals panel also rejected Nassif’s argument that the law in question — passed in 1967 to address a spike in disruptive actions inside the Capitol — was too vague and swept in too much First Amendment activity to pass constitutional muster.
The federal court of appeals ruling issued Tuesday appears to be in some tension with decisions reached in the 1980s and 1990s by the appeals court that oversees Washington’s local courts, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, which appeared to endorse the notion that protests regularly take place in the Capitol Rotunda. Several such rulings refer to the rotunda as a “unique situs for demonstration activity.”
Pillard dismissed the significance of those opinions, saying they seem “to derive more from an imprecise daisy chain of reasoning than from a considered assessment of the Capitol Rotunda’s history.”
Nassif was convicted following a bench trial by U.S. District Court Judge John Bates, an appointee of President George W. Bush. Bates also rejected Nassif’s argument that the anti-parading statute violates the First Amendment.
Nassif can ask the full bench of the D.C. Circuit to revisit his appeal or petition the Supreme Court for review.
The ruling upholds a statute that criminalizes “parading, picketing or demonstrating in a Capitol building.”
KYLE CHENEY and JOSH GERSTEIN
04/09/2024
When John Nassif surged into the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, he was among the hundreds chanting “Whose house? Our house!”
But that’s not exactly true, a federal appeals court countered Tuesday, rejecting Nassif’s challenge to his conviction for “demonstrating” inside the Capitol and ruling that the building itself — as opposed to the spacious parkland outside — is not legally a “public forum” for protest activity.
The ruling by a three-judge panel of the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals upholds a statute that criminalizes “parading, picketing or demonstrating in a Capitol building,” a law that has been used against hundreds of Jan. 6 defendants who breached the building that day.
“The record before us contains no evidence that Congress intended to open any portion of the Capitol buildings as a public forum for assembly and discourse,” the panel wrote in a unanimous 27-page ruling.
“To be sure, expressive activity by people other than members and staff happens every day in the Capitol buildings—in constituent meetings, lobbying sessions, committee hearings, and the like,” the judges continued. “But the communications that take place in the Capitol are typically ‘scheduled and controlled by Senators or Representatives, and they may or may not be open to observation or (less frequently) participation by the public.’”
The ruling is a victory for the Justice Department amid a string of challenges and setbacks related to the statutes it has deployed against Jan. 6 defendants. The Supreme Court is set to hear arguments next week in a case that could upend hundreds of Jan. 6 felony prosecutions for obstructing Congress’ proceedings that day, and several federal district court judges have recently rejected prosecutors’ view of another key misdemeanor charge: entering or remaining on the restricted grounds of the Capitol.
Nassif was convicted in 2022 of that charge — as well as three other misdemeanors — for joining the mob that breached the building, and he completed his seven-month sentence in January.
Nassif, 57, of Winter Springs, Florida, argued that the law prohibiting parading and picketing was unconstitutional because the Capitol building, including its historic rotunda, is traditionally open to the public and therefore cannot significantly restrict demonstration activity. But the court rejected that contention, concluding that because the building is actually Congress’ workplace — and was designed primarily for legislating — Congress is well within its power to prohibit activity that might disrupt its job.
“Inviting myriad parades, demonstrations, and pickets inside the Capitol buildings would disrupt the very legislative process that the buildings are designed to accommodate,” Judge Cornelia Pillard wrote for the three-judge panel.
Supporters of President Donald Trump climb the west wall of the the U.S. Capitol in Washington as they try to storm the building on Jan. 6, 2021.
All three judges who heard the appeal were appointed by Democratic presidents: Pillard was picked by Barack Obama, and Bradley Garcia and Michelle Childs were appointed by President Joe Biden.
Pillard noted that entry to the Capitol is “strictly regulated” and that members of the public typically must reserve a tour and face security screening before entering. Those restrictions, the court said, underscore that the Capitol is not “generally open for use by members of the public to voice whatever concerns they may have — much less to use for protests, pickets, or demonstrations.”
The appeals panel also rejected Nassif’s argument that the law in question — passed in 1967 to address a spike in disruptive actions inside the Capitol — was too vague and swept in too much First Amendment activity to pass constitutional muster.
The federal court of appeals ruling issued Tuesday appears to be in some tension with decisions reached in the 1980s and 1990s by the appeals court that oversees Washington’s local courts, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, which appeared to endorse the notion that protests regularly take place in the Capitol Rotunda. Several such rulings refer to the rotunda as a “unique situs for demonstration activity.”
Pillard dismissed the significance of those opinions, saying they seem “to derive more from an imprecise daisy chain of reasoning than from a considered assessment of the Capitol Rotunda’s history.”
Nassif was convicted following a bench trial by U.S. District Court Judge John Bates, an appointee of President George W. Bush. Bates also rejected Nassif’s argument that the anti-parading statute violates the First Amendment.
Nassif can ask the full bench of the D.C. Circuit to revisit his appeal or petition the Supreme Court for review.
Capitol Police Hire Special Prosecutors to Handle Rise in Threats Against Congress
The police department charged with protecting lawmakers has brought in new attorneys specially responsible for prosecuting people who make violent threats against members of Congress.
By Luke Broadwater and Catie Edmondson
April 9, 2024
www.nytimes.com
The police department charged with protecting lawmakers has brought in new attorneys specially responsible for prosecuting people who make violent threats against members of Congress.
By Luke Broadwater and Catie Edmondson
April 9, 2024
Capitol Police Hire Special Prosecutors to Handle Rise in Threats Against Congress
The police department charged with protecting lawmakers has brought in new attorneys specially responsible for prosecuting people who make violent threats against members of Congress.
Southwest Washington man pleads guilty to felony charge for Jan. 6 Capitol breach
A Yacolt, Washington, man pleaded guilty to a felony charge of civil disorder for his role in the Jan. 6 insurrection at the U.S. Capitol. 36-year-old Benjamin Silva will be sentenced on Sept. 17, 2024. Nearly a dozen defendants from Oregon and southwest Washington have been charged for crimes related to the breach of the U.S. Capitol.
Kyle Iboshi (KGW)
April 9, 2024
www.kgw.com
Benjamin Silva
A Yacolt, Washington, man pleaded guilty to a felony charge of civil disorder for his role in the Jan. 6 insurrection at the U.S. Capitol. 36-year-old Benjamin Silva will be sentenced on Sept. 17, 2024. Nearly a dozen defendants from Oregon and southwest Washington have been charged for crimes related to the breach of the U.S. Capitol.
Kyle Iboshi (KGW)
April 9, 2024
Southwest Washington man pleads guilty to felony charge for Jan. 6 Capitol breach
Nearly a dozen defendants from Oregon and southwest Washington have been charged for crimes related to the breach of the U.S. Capitol.
www.kgw.com
Benjamin Silva
Conservatives Suddenly Realize Tucker Carlson Is a Lying Russia Dupe
What changed?
ucker Carlson has changed. He has changed before, obviously: Originally a right-leaning but skeptical reporter, he evolved into a grotesquely racist, relentlessly dishonest authoritarian demagogue. In this incarnation, he attracted new followers while retaining many of his old ones and amassing, for a time, the largest audience in cable news.
Now, he has taken a decisive turn that has shed still more of his allies by denouncing Israel. Dedicated Trumpists like David Friedman, Joel Pollak, and David Reaboi have raised alarms. Jenna Ellis, the campaign attorney who assisted Trump’s efforts to secure an unelected second term, sadly observed that Carlson has become “very, very different than who he presented himself as on Fox News.” Eli Lake, in a Free Press essay, writes Carlson out of the respectable-conservative movement.
Any defection is welcome, and belated recognition of Carlson’s flaws is certainly preferable to none. You go to war with the semi-loyal democrats you have, not the semi-loyal democrats you want. The Trump era has made vividly clear that the Republican Party is oriented toward cohesion, and any weakening of its centripetal force is not to be taken for granted. It would be unrealistic to expect Republicans, especially those who have stood with Carlson to this late point in his long slide into semi-fascism, to undertake a full and thorough accounting of his flaws.
