U.S. Supreme Court has voted to strike down Roe vs. Wade
- Thread starter donwuan
- Start date
yes, and he thought he wouldn’t be a spoiler…. Jokes on him he still was the first time. The second time he might have been too but everyone was tired of Trump.
Bitches whining about men shouldn't make laws telling women what to do with their bodies. Those are the same men that make laws as it relates to family court. Those are the same men that make laws concerning sexual harassment when there is none. Those are the same men that keep your ass from signing up for selective service. Spare me. Shit I can't do what I want my body. Can I take cocaine or steroids legally?
That's just an excuse. Sanders had a lot money behind him and supposedly a lot of supporters. Now it was one thing to run under the Democratic Party the first time but the second time around he should have ran as a third party candidate. He should have built up a strong third party team to established a momentum going forward into other elections. He took the easy way out and expected the Democratic Party to support a candidate that was not a part of the party.
You’re entitled to your own opinion, but you’re not entitled to your own facts. I’ll ask again: What exactly did B vs B accomplish……IN LIGHT OF THE FACTS??? Other than letting you sit down next to white folks on the toilet??
With respect to homeownership, unemployment, and incarceration, America has failed to deliver any progress for African Americans over the last five decades. In these areas, their situation has either failed to improve relative to whites or has worsened. In 2017 the black unemployment rate was 7.5 percent, up from 6.7 percent in 1968, and is still roughly twice the white unemployment rate. In 2015, the black homeownership rate was just over 40 percent, virtually unchanged since 1968, and trailing a full 30 points behind the white homeownership rate, which saw modest gains over the same period. And the share of African Americans in prison or jail almost tripled between 1968 and 2016 and is currently more than six times the white incarceration rate.
"The Perot Simulator
In order to give an idea of what can happen when a presidential election features a very strong run by a third party candidacy, we took the liberty of tweaking the results of the 1992 election, where Texas billionaire Ross Perot literally gave Bill Clinton and George Bush a run for their money.
We decided to see what would have happened if Perot had run a more a more sustained long-term campaign than he did (if you’ll remember, he pulled back from active campaigning in the summer, then re-charged his efforts in September). The results of this particular hypothetical are quite revealing. Perot would have won the presidency in 1992 if he increased his vote percentage from 18.91% (the real result) to 34.79%, less than twice what he actually managed, winning a landslide of 320 electoral votes.
He could have achieved this by drawing equally from Bush and Clinton in all states, but, and this is important, without winning the popular vote. In this scenario, Clinton would still have been the winner of the popular vote at 35.07%. As we actually did in 2000, we would have had a president elected without winning the popular vote. See the Excel spreadsheet with the data.
Despite exit polls that showed that Perot drew essentially equally from his rivals, many people feel that Perot siphoned more support from Bush than from Clinton. Humoring this position, we also took a look at what would have happened if Perot drew 60% of his votes from would-be Bush voters, and 40% from Clinton. With those numbers, the Electoral College result would have been dramatically different. Perot would have won only 248 electoral votes, no one would have won a majority in the Electoral College, and the election would have been decided in Congress. Here’s the spreadsheet on this scenario.
Just a slightly smaller percentage increase for Perot (34.04% as opposed to the 35.07% of the first example, drawing equally from Bush and Clinton) would also have dramatically altered the Electoral College result. Perot would have won only 241 electoral votes, also with no electoral vote majority and a House-decided presidency. See those numbers here.
What does it all mean? A few things. First, it shows us that a strong third party candidate can, in fact, win an election. It is not implausible to speculate that someone like Michael Bloomberg could turn in a very strong showing in the 35% range in a three-way race. In our 1992 hypothetical, that was all Perot would have needed.
Our fictional-yet-feasible election scenario also debunks the myth that the Electoral College is the biggest obstacle in the way of a third party candidate winning the presidency. There are, indeed, many forces working against an independent run for the White House, but as our example shows, the Electoral College is not necessarily one of them.
Finally, we can see how our current system is so vulnerable to electing popular vote losers, especially in a situation where states can be won by a small plurality of just over 33% in a three-way race. The solutions? States are already signing onto the National Popular Vote plan to neutralize the Electoral College. Other states are seriously debating instant runoff voting, a voting method proving popular in cities, that protects majority rule while accommodating voter choice."
So excuses..Got it..
I really need to look into getting a vasectomy.
Not saying it would have made a difference but he dropped out when he had the momentum and than got back in which damaged his campaign. Again he probably still wouldn't have won.
He clearly wouldn't have won 19% of the popular vote and not one electoral vote come on y'all lol.
Because most states require ALL physicians to report abortion cases. Only a couple of states do not.
I was analyzing inpatient and outpatient data today. Looking at DRG 770 O0x.xx all day.
This is not the 1950's. People are not going to back alley doctors like on tv.
Nonetheless, It's been confirmed numerous times. Black women abort children at a higher rates than any other race.
It's a sad truth.
My wife would have to get my permission as well.
Now we had Bernie who built a momentum during his first run for president, and unlike Perot, Bernie came back for another run for president. So he had name recognitions, supporters, and money. Yet he still chose to run under the Democratics Party who he and his supporters have a problem with. Bernie ran under the establishment... He soldout..and so did Nena Turner.
This is just dumb. Yes, it's called child support.
Also, only 7 states do not have abortion restrictions. 43 states restrict abortion in some capacity. But, what pro-abortion folk are doing is trying to gradually chip away at the restrictions.
Most people on this board going bezerk over the right to kill a baby which is never going away.
Chill out.
"Data in Total column represent percentage of abortions reported with known race. Data may not sum to total due to rounding.
As data are reported voluntarily by providers to state or area health departments, information may be incomplete and result in undercounting abortions when calculating rates and ratios in some states. Data from 28 reporting areas; excludes 23 reporting areas (California, Colorado, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Missouri, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New York City, New York State, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Washington, Wisconsin, and Wyoming) that did not report, did not report by race/ethnicity, or did not meet reporting standards.
"Abortion Surveillance - United States, 2019. Table 2. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, Vol 70(No. SS-9):1–29. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, November 26, 2021.
Definitions
NR: State did not report, did not report by race, or did not meet reporting standards for race.
Other includes Asian, Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander, and American Indian or Alaska Native.
Footnotes
- Data from hospitals and licensed ambulatory care facilities only; because reporting is not mandatory for private physicians and women's centers, information could not be obtained for all abortions performed in New Jersey.
- Includes residents only."
Did you even look at the data? Every state reported but not every state reported race.
So, as data scientists, we "control" for the missing or incomplete data. Over half of the states in the US reported race. This is more than enough to calculate abortion percentage by race.
The hard truth is this, NY and California do not report race because the black and Hispanic numbers are much higher in those areas. It would be revealed that black women have abortions at 5 times the rate. Why? Because we are normalizing the killing of black babies and devaluing the lives of black babies to zero. Dudes on this board literally want to deny this existence of the child until the child is out the womb at 9 months. It's a child way before then.
Did you not say that it was mandatory for abortions to be reported and did my post not say that most white women have their's done with private doctors/health facilities. Doctors and health facilities that do not report such things. We know that black women are more than likely due to economic status to go to non private doctors/health facilities. Which means they are likely to reported.
She must be an agent or republican
If you look, EVERY state reported abortion. They just didnt report race. The reason why I say that it is mandatory to report is because if they do not report, then the facility becomes medicare/ medicaid ineligible. No facility wants to lose eligibility.
It's stupid, but it's how it is.
You’re entitled to your own opinion, but you’re not entitled to your own facts. I’ll ask again: What exactly did B vs B accomplish……IN LIGHT OF THE FACTS??? Other than letting you sit down next to white folks on the toilet??
With respect to homeownership, unemployment, and incarceration, America has failed to deliver any progress for African Americans over the last five decades. In these areas, their situation has either failed to improve relative to whites or has worsened. In 2017 the black unemployment rate was 7.5 percent, up from 6.7 percent in 1968, and is still roughly twice the white unemployment rate. In 2015, the black homeownership rate was just over 40 percent, virtually unchanged since 1968, and trailing a full 30 points behind the white homeownership rate, which saw modest gains over the same period. And the share of African Americans in prison or jail almost tripled between 1968 and 2016 and is currently more than six times the white incarceration rate.
Great video...should be mandatory watching for the bgol uncle toms
When it's officially announced as law the shit with blow up again. Women will be protesting all over the country.
Are you in favor for jail or forced labor for deadbeat dads, or are you happy to support and pay for these unwanted children? How many kids are YOU willing to adopt and potentially care for upwards of 23 years?
Hate these old ass politicians. Isn't the average age something like 62!? Need term limits
Good question.
Also
I'm sure these heaux use abortions as a form of birth control. Right or wrong.
