Is this true?
They had a hearing huh?
Why you mad faggit?
BGOL Coons will love this... that fool's whining about what we were at the time still learning..... and in the end.... the vaccine kept a good portion of those who took from becoming seriously ill and dying.... fuck the fools that don't take the vccine
.
I suuuuurrrre do you menstrating bitch, have your first wife come over and bow to ZOD, before the world endsWhy you mad faggit?
You know what to do
Between googling anuses and Trump, it's amazing you have the time to get sonned my me.I suuuuurrrre do you menstrating bitch, have your first wife come over and bow to ZOD, before the world ends
sonned? take your faggot ass and go play in one of your threads....and speaking of sons.... I'll make sure that I wear a raincoat before I smash your first wife..... then ZOD her out..... now scoot, run along now.... go find a corner bar to hang out at and put your arm around your imaginary big booty latina..... "When you can't even keep a woman.... "Ladies man"Between googling anuses and Trump, it's amazing you have the time to get sonned my me.
FDA Commissioner says the fix was in. They skipped the advisory board so they wouldn't have to release data to the public. Is he now an "anti vaxxer?"
You conveniently left out the other part of the article...Since antivaxers have no facts to support their arguments, they have to resort to taking statements out of context.
A person is only eligible for the bivalent booster if they've gotten their primary series of shots first.
"Dr. Paul Offit, a virologist and immunologist at the University of Pennsylvania, thinks both approaches are wrong. In his view, the original vaccine and boosters are doing a fine job of preventing serious illnesses and death"
The risk that he sees is that the existing vaccines may prove to be more effective than the bivalent booster and that it might've been better to go with a booster targeting BA.1 instead of BA.5.
Will Americans have the right COVID-19 vaccine this fall? Maybe
Determining which version of the coronavirus should be used to make COVID-19 vaccines and boosters is an exercise in educated guesswork.www.latimes.com
You conveniently left out the other part of the article...
"the potential upside of targeting Omicron is too uncertain to justify the risks of releasing a shot that hasn’t been subjected to a full clinical trial.
Sure, a bivalent vaccine booster might spur the immune system to generate more antibodies than a regular booster, but that doesn’t necessarily mean recipients would be better off, Offit said in an interview.
“If they’d given me a choice of choice of voting ‘no’ or ‘hell no,’ I’d have voted ‘hell no,’” he said.