School = daycares for many
companies needs kids in daycare so the parents can work
So far I have had less students email about being out with Covid than the delta surge last semester. Campus numbers are on a decline, so says the university.
Don’t know what that means. Just reporting it.
Sadly that may just be the result of people not getting tested and not taking this as serious as lqst year but hopefully its true.
As far as the university saying numbers are on the decline I'd be highly skeptical of that.
Definitely skeptical.
One thing I am proud to see is my young brothers and sister on campus masked up even when outside. Not 100% of them, but an overwhelming majority of them.
![]()
Frequent Boosters Spur Warning on Immune Response
European Union regulators warned that frequent Covid-19 booster shots could adversely affect the immune response and may not be feasible.www.bloomberg.com
![]()
Frequent Boosters Spur Warning on Immune Response
European Union regulators warned that frequent Covid-19 booster shots could adversely affect the immune response and may not be feasible.www.bloomberg.com
That's what's up.
I do believe that there's a direct correlation between individuals who are intelligent/educated and people who are adhering to the advised COVID safety protocols so that isn't surprising.
You don't realize how big our problem is until you look at countries like India and Brasil that have their own trump like leaders as well as a host of other problems but still have a higher % vaccinated than us.
![]()
You don't realize how big our problem is until you look at countries like India and Brasil that have their own trump like leaders as well as a host of other problems but still have a higher % vaccinated than us.
![]()
Never,in a million years,I would thought India and Mexico would have a higher vaccination rate than this shithole country.
You don't realize how big our problem is until you look at countries like India and Brasil that have their own trump like leaders as well as a host of other problems but still have a higher % vaccinated than us.
![]()
The fine print suggest the sampling is insanely unbalanced to the United States. 48k interviews versus 2200 to 6600 interviewed in other countries, especially considering that India and China are both countries with over a billion people each.
If anything, what I infer about this data is that the US’ sample is more conclusive than the other because of the number of interviews. The other countries, especially China and India are extremely inconclusive. They would have to interview at least 200k people in China or India to match the 48k interviewed in the US.
How does this work though? I remember reading that Gallup does around 1,000 participants for its polls as that is all that you need to get meaningful data without a crazy margin of error. I figured that 2k-6K would be an adequate sample size for countries larger than here but I also remember that there was point of diminishing return on adding to the sample size. This is all based off me remembering stuff from my college stats class a long time ago so tell me how I am messing this up.![]()
In order to calculate margin of error, you need a confidence level. So the survey didn’t specify which confidence level they were using which makes a world of difference in the margin of error. Confidence levels are 80%, 85%, 90%, 95% (most commonly used), and 99%.
Margin Of Error Calculator - SmartSurvey
Calculate your Customer Effort Score (CES) with our free tool, just enter the number of responses for each score to get an overall rating.www.smartsurvey.co.uk
All you need is the population of the country, the estimated sample you think the surgery used and play around with different confidence levels.
Example
US population: 300 million
Sample from Survey: 48k
Confidence level: 95%
Margin of error: 0.45%
China population: 1.3 billion
Sample from survey: 6600 (although it’s not specified from the survey, I just assumed the highest)
Confidence level: 95%
Margin of error: 1.21%
Those are really low margin of errors, right? Isn't usually 3% considered good?
Yes, ideally 3% is good at 95% confidence.
Those margin of errors are excellent, but a person like myself will call those stats into question because the population differences are so wide. And the margin of error difference are too wide. You want them closer if you’re comparing data.
Man..I went to pick up some food. restaurant was packed..no one with a mask .not even people working. Mad people in there coughing..I just left.