At first, I was like

but then I read the article. This is speculation from folks who don't seem to understand how AI works in two ways:
1) Currently, AI isn't capable of writing quality screenplays. It's best for generic outlines or brainstorming. Of course, that will change in a few years, but how much money will the studios save when they'll have to pay for massive rewrites from us humans?
2) AI is not intelligent. No thinking or creativity is going on. It pours over tremendous amounts of training data, identifies patterns, and comes up with the requested answers. We don't always know how the output was achieved or where the training data came from. An AI screenplay could contain scenes that originated from a long-forgotten TV show, jokes from a transcript of a Redd Foxx comedy album, or maybe a third-act twist lifted from a book excerpt that an aspiring author posted on a message board. The output has to come from
somewhere. Hollywood isn't ready for the class action lawsuits that are bound to happen.
People are blindly putting their faith in this dangerous and misunderstood technology. We all know about the implicit biases against Black people in the criminal justice system, education, employment, medicine, etc. Even more of it is lurking in the data. Think about all the stereotypical and flat-out racist depictions of Black people in film and TV. Now they want this
thing writing stories, likely using some of that biased training data, and some underpaid human will still have to go over it and fix the bad stuff.