BREAKING: INVESTIGATION ENDS, AG BARR HAS MUELLERS REPORT .... an impending twitter fest now looms

grownazzblakman

Rising Star
Platinum Member
Umm.. so how does Barr say that there was "No Collusion" between the Trump Campaign.... when Mueller has already indicted Roger Stone on 7 different charges for ‘lying about collusion’? :hmm:

In new Mueller indictment, what is Roger Stone charged with doing?
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...ctment-what-is-roger-stone-charged-with-doing

Count One alleges that Stone obstructed the House committee's investigation by denying he had emails and other documents about WikiLeaks-related contacts. During his House testimony, Stone was asked if he had "emails to anyone concerning the allegations of hacked documents ... or any discussions you have had with third parties about [WikiLeaks]?" Stone answered that he did not, when in fact he had a bunch of emails and other communications. The obstruction charge also alleges Stone attempted to prevent Credico from testifying or tried to convince him to testify falsely.

Counts two through six concern specific statements to the House committee. Count Two is based on Stone's assertion that he did not have emails.

Count Three alleges that Stone lied when he said that Credico was his only "go-between" to Assange, when in fact, Stone was also in contact with Corsi for that purpose. "At no time did Stone identify [Corsi] to [the House] as another individual Stone contacted to serve as a 'go-between,'" the indictment says.

Count Four alleges that Stone lied when he said he did not ask Credico to communicate anything to Assange, when in fact Stone asked both Credico and Corsi to get in touch with Assange "to pass on requests ... for documents Stone believed would be damaging to the Clinton campaign."

Count Five alleges that Stone lied when he told the House that he and Credico did not communicate via text message or email about WikiLeaks. Stone told the committee the two talked over the phone, when in fact, according to the indictment, "Stone and [Credico] ... engaged in frequent written communications by email and text message."

Count Six alleges that Stone lied when he testified that he had never discussed his conversations with Credico with anyone at the Trump campaign, when in fact, "Stone spoke to multiple individuals involved in the Trump campaign about what he claimed to have learned from his intermediary to [WikiLeaks]."

Count Seven is a witness tampering charge, alleging that Stone tried to convince Credico to take the Fifth or to lie to the House committee.

Roger Stone’s emails and contacts and ‘attempts’ to contact Julian Assange & all his “lying to Congress” CONTRADICTS everything that Barr said. :hmm:
 

Spectrum

Elite Poster
BGOL Investor
It makes the dems look really bad because they were acting like there was something there for 2 years. Now if they persue obstruction its going to be worse for them. He is going to win again

Naw. I think everyone is pretty dug in on Trump. The people who thought he was innocent are saying "We told you so". The people who think he was guilty feel like it's a coverup. I'll bet you that doesn't change much.

Dems can't pursue obstruction though and Pelosi smartly pulled that off the table weeks ago. She clearly knew what the fuck she was doing.

Dems just gotta be this muthafucka at the ballot box now.
 

fonzerrillii

BGOL Elite Poster
Platinum Member
Its worthless if it doesnt say he clearly colluded

He was never going to say that he colluded...

There never was enough to show that he specifically worked with the Russians in their attempt to direct the election....

But the report did state that the Russians made several attempts to direct trump and his people.... I’m curious about all the people that the Russians did contact within trump organization and there are some people that we don’t know about.
 

Complex

Internet Superstar
BGOL Investor
Why do they keep interrupting the NCAA tourney to comment on this shit

Fuck impeachment

Why can't this fat fuck choke on a chicken nugget
 

Spectrum

Elite Poster
BGOL Investor
Umm.. so how does Barr say that there was "No Collusion" between the Trump Campaign.... when Mueller has already indicted Roger Stone on 7 different charges for ‘lying about collusion’? :hmm:

In new Mueller indictment, what is Roger Stone charged with doing?
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...ctment-what-is-roger-stone-charged-with-doing

Count One alleges that Stone obstructed the House committee's investigation by denying he had emails and other documents about WikiLeaks-related contacts. During his House testimony, Stone was asked if he had "emails to anyone concerning the allegations of hacked documents ... or any discussions you have had with third parties about [WikiLeaks]?" Stone answered that he did not, when in fact he had a bunch of emails and other communications. The obstruction charge also alleges Stone attempted to prevent Credico from testifying or tried to convince him to testify falsely.

Counts two through six concern specific statements to the House committee. Count Two is based on Stone's assertion that he did not have emails.

Count Three alleges that Stone lied when he said that Credico was his only "go-between" to Assange, when in fact, Stone was also in contact with Corsi for that purpose. "At no time did Stone identify [Corsi] to [the House] as another individual Stone contacted to serve as a 'go-between,'" the indictment says.

Count Four alleges that Stone lied when he said he did not ask Credico to communicate anything to Assange, when in fact Stone asked both Credico and Corsi to get in touch with Assange "to pass on requests ... for documents Stone believed would be damaging to the Clinton campaign."

Count Five alleges that Stone lied when he told the House that he and Credico did not communicate via text message or email about WikiLeaks. Stone told the committee the two talked over the phone, when in fact, according to the indictment, "Stone and [Credico] ... engaged in frequent written communications by email and text message."

Count Six alleges that Stone lied when he testified that he had never discussed his conversations with Credico with anyone at the Trump campaign, when in fact, "Stone spoke to multiple individuals involved in the Trump campaign about what he claimed to have learned from his intermediary to [WikiLeaks]."

Count Seven is a witness tampering charge, alleging that Stone tried to convince Credico to take the Fifth or to lie to the House committee.


Roger Stone’s emails and contacts and ‘attempts’ to contact Julian Assange & all his “lying to Congress” CONTRADICTS everything that Barr said. :hmm:



Yeah. The shit makes no sense. Trump is probably gonna try to pardon both manafort and stone now.
 

therealjondoe

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
Umm.. so how does Barr say that there was "No Collusion" between the Trump Campaign.... when Mueller has already indicted Roger Stone on 7 different charges for ‘lying about collusion’? :hmm:

In new Mueller indictment, what is Roger Stone charged with doing?
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...ctment-what-is-roger-stone-charged-with-doing

Count One alleges that Stone obstructed the House committee's investigation by denying he had emails and other documents about WikiLeaks-related contacts. During his House testimony, Stone was asked if he had "emails to anyone concerning the allegations of hacked documents ... or any discussions you have had with third parties about [WikiLeaks]?" Stone answered that he did not, when in fact he had a bunch of emails and other communications. The obstruction charge also alleges Stone attempted to prevent Credico from testifying or tried to convince him to testify falsely.

Counts two through six concern specific statements to the House committee. Count Two is based on Stone's assertion that he did not have emails.

Count Three alleges that Stone lied when he said that Credico was his only "go-between" to Assange, when in fact, Stone was also in contact with Corsi for that purpose. "At no time did Stone identify [Corsi] to [the House] as another individual Stone contacted to serve as a 'go-between,'" the indictment says.

Count Four alleges that Stone lied when he said he did not ask Credico to communicate anything to Assange, when in fact Stone asked both Credico and Corsi to get in touch with Assange "to pass on requests ... for documents Stone believed would be damaging to the Clinton campaign."

Count Five alleges that Stone lied when he told the House that he and Credico did not communicate via text message or email about WikiLeaks. Stone told the committee the two talked over the phone, when in fact, according to the indictment, "Stone and [Credico] ... engaged in frequent written communications by email and text message."

Count Six alleges that Stone lied when he testified that he had never discussed his conversations with Credico with anyone at the Trump campaign, when in fact, "Stone spoke to multiple individuals involved in the Trump campaign about what he claimed to have learned from his intermediary to [WikiLeaks]."

Count Seven is a witness tampering charge, alleging that Stone tried to convince Credico to take the Fifth or to lie to the House committee.


Roger Stone’s emails and contacts and ‘attempts’ to contact Julian Assange & all his “lying to Congress” CONTRADICTS everything that Barr said. :hmm:
Not the Russian government
 

fonzerrillii

BGOL Elite Poster
Platinum Member
Naw. I think everyone is pretty dug in on Trump. The people who thought he was innocent are saying "We told you so". The people who think he was guilty feel like it's a coverup. I'll bet you that doesn't change much.

Dems can't pursue obstruction though and Pelosi smartly pulled that off the table weeks ago. She clearly knew what the fuck she was doing.

Dems just gotta be this muthafucka at the ballot box now.

Agree....

I do think that you can sell what the report says related to the obstruction.... especially if it points to things that we didn’t know about.
 

therealjondoe

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
Naw. I think everyone is pretty dug in on Trump. The people who thought he was innocent are saying "We told you so". The people who think he was guilty feel like it's a coverup. I'll bet you that doesn't change much.

Dems can't pursue obstruction though and Pelosi smartly pulled that off the table weeks ago. She clearly knew what the fuck she was doing.

Dems just gotta be this muthafucka at the ballot box now.
It energized the right and they will be sure to show up on election day
 

Spectrum

Elite Poster
BGOL Investor
I might buy a ticket. You gonna see your boy with a red hat and yelling "Bigly".

This is a HUGE win for dude.. :smh:

It's a massive one right before he's about to kick off his 2020 re-election campaign. Like this nigga has the gift of fate on his side..... how a S.C. seat came up right before the fucking mid-terms... the wind always seems to blow behind his sails. :smh:
 

grownazzblakman

Rising Star
Platinum Member
Not the Russian government
That's just Semantics. :hmm: A 'technicality'.

Because Russian Government Intelligence Operatives....GAVE.... WikiLeaks the e-mails that it hacked from the Democratic National Committee. That was established a long time ago. (None of these folks were woking "on behalf" of the USA. :rolleyes:)
 

Spectrum

Elite Poster
BGOL Investor
Agree....

I do think that you can sell what the report says related to the obstruction.... especially if it points to things that we didn’t know about.

Oh yeah. They need to get the full report and expose what really happened to just at least say...he's not getting indicted by the DOJ but he's clearly a criminal.
 

Spectrum

Elite Poster
BGOL Investor
That's just Semantics. :hmm: A 'technicality'.

Because Russian Government Intelligence Operatives....GAVE.... WikiLeaks the e-mails that it hacked from the Democratic National Committee. That was established a long time ago. (None of these folks were woking "on behalf" of the USA. :rolleyes:)


Yeah. Barr is saying "We don't have evidence they were coordinating with The Kremlin". That was never going to happen anyway.
 

hardawayz16

Rising Star
Registered
Naw. I think everyone is pretty dug in on Trump. The people who thought he was innocent are saying "We told you so". The people who think he was guilty feel like it's a coverup. I'll bet you that doesn't change much.

If Trump can get just a fraction of the people who thought he was guilty to believe it was a wasteful witch hunt orchestrated by weak democrats he's going to cruise to victory.
 

zod16

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
Yeap...

He did exactly what he said he would do and this letter is pure bs...

I haven’t reviewed all of the evidence but from what I’ve seen .... I can’t find obstruction beyond a reasonable doubt...



What the hell is that??

Everything about this is suspect as fuck. The investigation ends with no interviews of any of the major players involved? Trump is allowed to submit written answers with no actual interview?
 

Spectrum

Elite Poster
BGOL Investor
Everything about this is suspect as fuck. The investigation ends with no interviews of any of the major players involved? Trump is allowed to submit written answers with no actual interview?

Yeah. And he didn't even submit written responses to the questions about obstruction.
 

grownazzblakman

Rising Star
Platinum Member
Yeah. Barr is saying "We don't have evidence they were coordinating with The Kremlin". That was never going to happen anyway.
But they never NEEDED to prove that they "coordinated" with the Kremlin. :smh:

Coordination with WIKILEAKS is enough. :yes:
Because Wikileaks was the 'Fence' for stolen goods... working for the Kremlin.

For example >> A person who rides in a stolen car AND KNOWS that the car has been stolen can be convicted for 'auto theft' :yes: ... even if they (personally) did not steal the vehicle themselves... and Roger Stone 'approached' Wikileaks KNOWING that they were in possession of stolen 'vehicles'...and he WILLFULLY sought to acquire said stolen 'vehicles'.... and LIED about his attempts to acquire 'stolen vehicles'. :rolleyes:

That's not an accident.
He's not some innocent bystander. :smh:

He's a middle-man who was caught in the midst of his 'coordination' with another middle-man... who works for the Kremlin.

Just saying.
 

Spectrum

Elite Poster
BGOL Investor
But they never NEEDED to prove that they "coordinated" with the Kremlin. :smh:

Coordination with WIKILEAKS is enough. :yes:
Because Wikileaks was the 'Fence' for stolen goods... working for the Kremlin.

For example >> A person who rides in a stolen car AND KNOWS that the car has been stolen can be convicted for 'auto theft' :yes: ... even if they (personally) did not steal the vehicle themselves... and Roger Stone 'approached' Wikileaks KNOWING that they were in possession of stolen 'vehicles'...and he WILLFULLY sought to acquire said stolen 'vehicles'.... and LIED about his attempts to acquire 'stolen vehicles'.

He's not some innocent bystander. :smh: He's a middle-man.

Just saying.

Oh. I know. Barr is pretty much saying we don't have a direct agreement between Trump and Putin...which would never be a possibility.
 

Spectrum

Elite Poster
BGOL Investor
Everything about this is suspect as fuck. The investigation ends with no interviews of any of the major players involved? Trump is allowed to submit written answers with no actual interview?

It's also crazy that we don't even know how many pages the Mueller Report is.
 

zod16

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
Oh. I know. Barr is pretty much saying we don't have a direct agreement between Trump and Putin...which would never be a possibility.

Exactly this. I remember reading the full Starr report on AOL when it came out. :lol: Why the fuck is the full report not available for this? If the Democrats can't burn this bitch down...
 

easy_b

Easy_b is in the place to be.
BGOL Investor
So it was up to the attorney general to charge or indict the president and he choose not to??


 

Spectrum

Elite Poster
BGOL Investor
Exactly this. I remember reading the full Starr report on AOL when it came out. :lol: Why the fuck is the full report not available for this? If the Democrats can't burn this bitch down...

they were sending that shit out to everyone's house like they used to do with those big ass Yellow Pages...no we're getting double-spaced 3 and half pages reports :lol: :smh:
 
Top