That maybe the even bigger issueWait till you read the article about the shortages that will eventually hit...
That maybe the even bigger issueWait till you read the article about the shortages that will eventually hit...
most people weren't force to stop working until like 2 weeks ago.. Some places still had people working and operating up until last week.. That doesn't fall on the people but improper leadership and information.. Most political figures from each state had to make that call not the dude who during this time suppose to do his job and push certain tactics... As of right now it's not clear if every state is following similar protocols.. This virus is exposing how much these states really ain't united and operate under their own rules... There's not even a true time table of how long this is suppose to last.. Once again can't blame the people the individuals who job is to take action in time of crisis is failing... They can text your phone for electing a politician but can text your phone for proper procedures and info about symptoms , dos and donts, etc.. Worst reaction to crisis ever.. Yet luckily this plague ain't s hit compare to the real 1s from century past cause the body count would be in the 10s of millions by nowWith all due respect, you like many millions of others thinking about it wrong. First, there is and will not be a cure. Will there be ways to treat and provide resistance? Yes. Cure? no.
Second, the idea behind social distancing is to slow or stop the spread. Again slow or stop the spread. Why? Because most of us will be able to naturally develop antibodies that will prevent spreading the virus. The problem is, people are continuously spreading the virus before our bodies natural defences can act. Basically, social distancing allows three things to happen.
1. Some people with it will die, therefore they cant spread it.
2. Some people with it will naturally develop antibodies, therefore they cant spread it.
3. Some people wont get it, therefore they cant spread it.
Very logical concept. But, extremely difficult to inact.
I hear those numbers being tossed around as well. There is no way in hell that many people will die by the end of the year of COVID-19.
Flu usually has more victims in less time and more casualities.. Flu game so great it made millions worldwide take a shot every yr juss so they won't see them hands
Flu: my name is legendary in these streets..respek my gangsta partner
Sorry bro,Nigga please
is it more deadly because they shut things down or its more deadly cause you know for a fact it's worse? If people just started running randomly screaming they shooting im pretty sure you would start running to.. But are you running cause you saw them running and saying people are shooting or are you running cause you heard gun shots, saw somebody shooting, and know for a fact somebody shooting? Humans have a tendency to react on knee jerk moments more than actual factsRight and the flu is way less deadly. Way less.
Corona is more deadly and more contagious.
The flu does not have the government shutting shit down and telling people to stay home.
They know how bad this can get if people were doing business as usual.
1/3 of the people on the planet would die from Corona if left unchecked.
People would be going on vacation and infected every corner of the earth.
People don't wanna believe that part has anything to do with it at all.Another problem is 30 to 40% of this country is not healthy so you have to keep that part in mind when it comes to this Virus
125,000 infections in 4 months with a population of 330+ million people... That's not even 33 percent of 1 percent... This is the number people really need to understand... Not even half of 1 percent of Americans are affected by this.. That is literally laughed at by the plague gods... Corona couldn't even sit at the baby chair of plagues.. Flu even looking at corona like "seats taken" when corona tried to sit down next to him
Ain’t no damn proof of this knock it offSorry bro,
Weed smoke still contains several harmful chemicals, such as ammonia, hydrogen cyanide, nitric oxide, and aromatic amines. Chronic exposure to these compounds in smoke is known to cause bronchitis and COPD.
You cant deny facts.
Your knowledge is both limited and lacking.Brother you are 100% wrong here.
Every scientist has said that the virus will continue to infect people until either we develop a vaccine or we develop herd immunity (which happens when between 50-75% of the planet gets the disease).
No scientist, to my knowledge has ever said, nor has given any reason to think that it will stop infecting people when it reaches 1%.
Not trying to sound like the anti weed guy. Eat it or water vape it. But, lighting a fire and inhaling it is detrimental. Logically, you breath out carbon dioxide, a waste product. Inhaling the same carbon into your lungs is not life sustaining.
Ironically, the same things naysayers are saying now is exactly what people were saying about cigarettes.
Regardless, its your body, do what you want. But, one can never say they were not privy to the facts.
is it more deadly because they shut things down or its more deadly cause you know for a fact it's worse? If people just started running randomly screaming they shooting im pretty sure you would start running to.. But are you running cause you saw them running and saying people are shooting or are you running cause you heard gun shots, saw somebody shooting, and know for a fact somebody shooting? Humans have a tendency to react on knee jerk moments more than actual facts
You’re the one putting out misinformation based on non-scientific wishful thinking.Your knowledge is both limited and lacking.
I literally just posted the link to the article.
Please educate yourself before engaging me again.
This subject is far too important for you to be disseminating false information and wilfull ignorance.
are you stupid?You’re the one putting out misinformation based on non-scientific wishful thinking.
We should all be prepared for what’s coming
There is evidence that is leading us to believe that individuals who engage in regular weed smoking are significantly more likely to have complications resulting from the virus.
Why? Because even if you say that weed is natural (kinda).....inhaling carbon is not. In fact it is a anti life process damaging various portions of your lungs.
These same damaged portions are what's affected by covid-19.
Did you read the article that you posted? or did you just skim the first 3 paragraphs.are you stupid?
i mean if you are i'll leave you alone...but if youre trolling this IS NOT the shit to fuck with people about.
i shared the most up to date fact and science based information...
...and your ignorant ass is choosing to NOT READ IT and run with FEAR instead.
NO. it IS NOT.Bro. This shit is airborne AIDS.
I think you’re wrong. Think about it a single peasant in a Chinese market ate a bat, and 4 months later the disease is in every corner of the world. Nebraska is not safe.The large population areas like NYC where everyone is jammed in close together will get hit worse as we're seeing, but I doubt that places like Nebraska, Wyoming, etc will see 40-70%.
Never said marijuana. There are definitely medicinal benefits of CBD (cannabidiol).How many marijuana deaths reported last year?
do you know the difference between "could be" and "WILL BE"?Did you read the article that you posted? or did you just skim the first 3 paragraphs.
If you did you would have read that it says this:
“Because this is such a contagious virus, a large percentage of the world’s population, potentially billions of people, could become infected within the next couple of years. Frantic efforts to develop a safe and effective vaccine are likely to take a year or more.”
The same article said that our social distancing measures will NOT stop the spread, just slow it down for as long as we do it:
““Social distancing is building speed bumps so that we can slow the spread of the virus. We have to respect the speed bumps,” Messaoudi said.”
The article never discussed the death rate of the virus, but the CDC says they believe it around 1%.
The premise of this thread is that if our best current science says that the disease has a 1% death rate, and our best current science (including the article you linked) says that 40% of the population will likely get it, doesn’t it follow that millions will die from it?
I don’t think I am saying anything all that controversial.
I know the difference. The point is that your article in no way contradicted the judgment of the #1 epidemiologist at Harvard, who I quoted. He claims that 40-60% of the world will get corona.do you know the difference between "could be" and "WILL BE"?
worst case scenarios tend to be far different from actual events.
800k were infected in China.
they expected MILLIONS.
I need links to yo claims brother TitoSorry bro,
Weed smoke still contains several harmful chemicals, such as ammonia, hydrogen cyanide, nitric oxide, and aromatic amines. Chronic exposure to these compounds in smoke is known to cause bronchitis and COPD.
You cant deny facts.
Smoke = SpiritNever said marijuana. There are definitely medicinal benefits of CBD (cannabidiol).
I am speaking only about the smoke.
Nope, alcohol is worst than marijuana. #factsI need links to yo claims brother Tito
u telling me Alcohol and Scripts are better than Weed?
we been smoking since King Tut had Mufasa
I know the difference. The point is that your article in no way contradicted the judgment of the #1 epidemiologist at Harvard, who I quoted. He claims that 40-60% of the world will get corona.
I think he knows a little more than you, so I’ll take his word over yours.
Your quote above does not contradict the Harvard doctor’s opinion, which has not changedMarc Lipsitch has ALREADY walked back his worse case scenarios numbers.
"It is true that we can’t be sure either how many infections there have been in any population or the risk of needing intensive care or the case fatality rate."
We know enough now to act decisively against Covid-19. Social distancing is a good place to start
Waiting and hoping for a miracle as health systems are overrun by Covid-19 is not an option. We need to use the time we are buying with social distancing to mobilize massive efforts to find new ways to cope with this disease.www.statnews.com
Yes, please do. His MOST RECENT assessment matches the information I posted earlier.
Hospital beds capacity is what’s missing in this discussion
America doesn’t have a 20% ICU capacity
Not even 1% to take 3m ICU beds
More like 0.1% or 300k
If even just 20% get infected and 5% get sick that’s 1.7m dead
U.S. COVID Risk & Vaccine Tracker
Covid Act Now has real-time tracking of your community's COVID risk level. Explore how your community is doing.covidactnow.org
But you saw how China was beating ass if you were caught on the street during the lockdown right... That's how you prevent worst case scenario... Act swiftly and decisively.do you know the difference between "could be" and "WILL BE"?
worst case scenarios tend to be far different from actual events.
800k were infected in China.
they expected MILLIONS.
Plus the fact that heart attacks, strokes, serious injuries, and other non-corona medical issues are still happening. The virus doesn't have doesn't have to be the plague of all plagues, but it's still powerful enough to overwhelm the healthcare system. Not everyone is going to get the treatment they need, which will result in more deaths.
But you saw how China was beating ass if you were caught on the street during the lockdown right... That's how you prevent worst case scenario... Act swiftly and decisively.
Best case scenario..... Nobody dies
Worst case scenario..... 1percent of 40 percent of 350million die.
The "Harvard doctor" you're referring to IS MARC LIPSITCH, you fucking ninny. Its THE SAME MAN writing both articles!Just read an article from the top epidemiologist at Harvard, who along with 2 other scientists say that 40-70% of the worlds population will “likely” get Covid this year.
Harvard scientist: coronavirus pandemic likely will infect 40-70% of world this year
A Harvard epidemiologist calls a global COVID-19 pandemic ‘likely’ while CDC doctors say they are bracing for it to spread beyond the current 15 cases in the USthehill.com
If they’re right, and there is a 1% death rate in the disease. Doesn’t that mean that 1.4 million Americans will die?
My math is 40% (the low estimate) times 350 million Americans times 1 percent. I realize that the death rate may be lower, but so far that’s what the numbers tell us.
If this is true, why any anyone sounding the alarm?