Do any of you believe she genuinely mistook Jean's apartment for hers?
Dallas cop enters wrong apartment, kills Black man Botham Jean who lives there [LIVE TRIAL LINK]
- Thread starter PliggaNease
- Start date
I do not...
No. She was talking to her booty call, he told her fuck off I'm going home to my wife and she took it out on Botham.
And if she didn't, how can you explain people hearing an argument before she shot? She wanted that kill, look at her. Look at those soulless eyes and demonic face.
On a side note it looks like she might have a nice lil ass, no wonder why her partner was creeping on the low. He should lose his job too.
Not a chance, when I was in the military barracks I had to walk up and down stairs after 12 hour shifts no once did I not know it was not my floor due the aura and different things each floor and nobody enter my spot my mistake...and all those military barrack hallways look the same.
Do yall believe Jean was SPECIFICALLY targeted by her? Or could have anyone else fell victim the same way?
Was she checking doors or just so happen the first door she tried was not completely closed?
All seems so illogical to me and I know I am bad for trying to make sense of stuff that doesn't make sense.
After this criminal trial is over, best believe the apartment complex will get sued !!!
My own unprovable theory, is that she parked on the 3rd floor so her partner can have a spot on 4th floor to make convenient for him for when he came by but on way to her apartment she decided to stop Jean's to tell him "dont be making any noise" but she wanted to use her uniform as a position of authority, she entered his apartment with the master key like she is the law and when she got in there she got scared when Jean started to get up and she popped him.
Why text hurry up if the partner wasn't coming by in the first place?
hmmm ....
Murder Charge vs Manslaughter Charge Debate !!!
Okay, let me clear some things up
I see a lot of people on here saying she should be found guilty of manslaughter, blah, blah, blah
Fellas I get it.....
Usually people want to convict of manslaughter as the "lesser charge" or a way to "compromise"
Again fellas I get it...
But in this case I think convicting her of manslaughter would be 100% wrong
The definition of manslaughter is the unintentional death of a person
Fellas she just got on the witness stand, and said under oath, on the record... Yes I Intentionally Killed Him !!!
If you convict her of manslaughter, that shit is going to get thrown out, on appeal, by another judge !!!
Fam, Texas is different than other states
A murder charge does not mean an automatic life sentence or even 25-to-life
Murder in Texas == 5-99 years (with no parole)
Manslaughter in Texas == 2-20 years (with parole)
So you could have a case where someone gets 15 years for Manslaughter, or 10 years for Murder
The years/time overlap
Don't get so caught up on the "word Murder", and think, since its a white cop they have to compromise on the "lesser" charge
You have to get out of that mentality
At the time the gun went off...she meant to aim at him, she meant to aim center mass, she meant to pull the trigger, & she meant to kill him
Again she even said it herself on the witness stand
The gun did not accidentally go off (in a struggle) & kill him
She did not shoot through a wall or shoot in a crowd of people & accidentally kill him
This is why initially no judge wanted to issue an arrest warrant for manslaughter
Police Chief Renee Hall had to go all the way to that coon Texas Ranger, and get him to cosign on a manslaughter charge
Then a grand jury changed it to a murder charge
On top of that, I believe this jury can decide on how many years she gets if convicted? I believe?
So in essence they could give her a 5-10 year murder charge, if they wanted to
But lets hope for much more, of course
They should finally be rapping everything up on Monday, so we will see
Okay, let me clear some things up
I see a lot of people on here saying she should be found guilty of manslaughter, blah, blah, blah
Fellas I get it.....
Usually people want to convict of manslaughter as the "lesser charge" or a way to "compromise"
Again fellas I get it...
But in this case I think convicting her of manslaughter would be 100% wrong
The definition of manslaughter is the unintentional death of a person
Fellas she just got on the witness stand, and said under oath, on the record... Yes I Intentionally Killed Him !!!
If you convict her of manslaughter, that shit is going to get thrown out, on appeal, by another judge !!!
Fam, Texas is different than other states
A murder charge does not mean an automatic life sentence or even 25-to-life
Murder in Texas == 5-99 years (with no parole)
Manslaughter in Texas == 2-20 years (with parole)
So you could have a case where someone gets 15 years for Manslaughter, or 10 years for Murder
The years/time overlap
Don't get so caught up on the "word Murder", and think, since its a white cop they have to compromise on the "lesser" charge
You have to get out of that mentality
At the time the gun went off...she meant to aim at him, she meant to aim center mass, she meant to pull the trigger, & she meant to kill him
Again she even said it herself on the witness stand
The gun did not accidentally go off (in a struggle) & kill him
She did not shoot through a wall or shoot in a crowd of people & accidentally kill him
This is why initially no judge wanted to issue an arrest warrant for manslaughter
Police Chief Renee Hall had to go all the way to that coon Texas Ranger, and get him to cosign on a manslaughter charge
Then a grand jury changed it to a murder charge
On top of that, I believe this jury can decide on how many years she gets if convicted? I believe?
So in essence they could give her a 5-10 year murder charge, if they wanted to
But lets hope for much more, of course
They should finally be rapping everything up on Monday, so we will see
Last edited:
I hope she gets at least 25. Make an example of her. Take away from her the years of life she took from him. Fuck it, make it 35
If they were sexually involved then it would be kept secret. She was not determined to keep him alive for some reason.
You are correct, I don't disagree with what you said, it's just that the issue of being in the wrong apartment and "I mistook the apartment to be my own", not her words, but her defense, is what is the fine line.Murder Charge vs Manslaughter Charge Debate !!!
Okay, let me clear some things up
I see a lot of people on here saying she should be found guilty of manslaughter, blah, blah, blah
Fellas I get it.....
Usually people want to convict of manslaughter as the "lesser charge" or a way to "compromise"
Again fellas I get it...
But in this case I think convicting her of manslaughter would be 100% wrong
The definition of manslaughter is the unintentional death of a person
Fellas she just got on the witness stand, and said under oath, on the record... Yes I Intentionally Killed Him !!!
If you convict her of manslaughter, that shit is going to get thrown out, on appeal, by another judge !!!
Fam, Texas is different than other states
A murder charge does not mean an automatic life sentence or even 25-to-life
Murder in Texas == 5-99 years (with no parole)
Manslaughter in Texas == 2-20 years (with parole)
So you could have a case where someone gets 15 years for Manslaughter, or 10 years for Murder
The years/time overlap
Don't get so caught up on the "word Murder", and think, since its a white cop they have to compromise on the "lesser" charge
You have to get out of that mentality
At the time the gun went off...she meant to aim at him, she meant to aim center mass, she meant to pull the trigger, & she meant to kill him
Again she even said it herself on the witness stand
The gun did not accidentally go off (in a struggle) & kill him
She did not shoot through a wall or shoot in a crowd of people & accidentally kill him
This is why initially no judge wanted to issue an arrest warrant for manslaughter
Police Chief Renee Hall had to go all the way to that coon Texas Ranger, and get him to cosign on a manslaughter charge
Then a grand jury changed it to a murder charge
On top of that, I believe this jury can decide on how many years she gets if convicted? I believe?
So in essence they could give her a 5-10 year murder charge, if they wanted to
But lets hope for much more, of course
They should finally be rapping everything up on Monday, so we will see
Example, many years ago, when I lived in Brooklyn, my wife's mom came over while we were in the house, I saw this white dude run in my backyard and go to the far end of my yard, I had a bat by my back door, and I ran outside and said hey what the fuck are you doing, he stayed by the tree and I didnt make out who it was. he finally looked back and I made out who it was.
My wife's mom husband, ran back there (he's high yellow) and was pissing on the tree, cause he didn't think he had time to ring the door and come inside, he was waiting in the car and quickly did that.
I had all rights to bash his head in with my bat. BUT a jury, would look at things differently even if I did it by mistake.
I am not an attorney, but living in Texas, two years ago, went thru the course to get my gun permit after Harvey. In class you learn a whole damn lot about murder and laws about what is justified or not.
See Amber is on a thin line stating that she "thought her life was in danger". You can't simply state that because someone is in your home. Was there a weapon present that you saw was making an immediate threat to your life? No, she assumed. It's why the DA was trying to push the story of what if it was maintenance, that was weak because it was 10 o'frigging clock at night. So that seemed dumb.
Where she fucked up is shooting into the dark (nonsense, cause TV light and hallways light) not knowing what was there, which is her story. So it could of been your mother or boyfriend coming over for a surprise visit.
You cannot discharge your weapon, as a cop or citizen without knowing the threat in your view. You cannot randomly shoot (by law) towards some unknown threat without knowing there was a threat.
Back to my crib back in Brooklyn, yeah anyone would of beat a fool over the head with a bat, in your backyard trying to steal something. But now he's dead, and the jury looking at you and sympathizing with his family because he had no weapon and just was hungry looking for something to eat or some nonsense.
I don't want her to spending nothing but hard time but to me for her to get convicted of murder is a fine line because 'her life was in danger' is her story. Which is BS because the defense would have to prove that he came or lunged at her. He had to of had a weapon. To me the defense argument of murder is very weak at this point. Anyone would say I saw a threat in my house and yes I intended to shoot him. Or else then you are careless with a weapon. Can't state you didn't mean to shoot him or in that direction, you have to say I intended to pull the trigger.
They are fighting the narrative that she rendered no patient care or concern for the person she just murdered. She never laid a hand on his body. Not one vid showed her with a glove on, nor any blood from touching him. You always have gloves in your pockets, like second nature, for pat downs or searches. She never had one on her hands when they walked in. As seen here (disclaimer they are doing CPR in the below vid) :
And as he said in the last 3 mins is the semantics they are arguing at this point.
They have to go after murder to get the lesser charge. I just think proving murder is going to be tough, but I'm liking the make-up of the jury so we will see.
2030 Eastern Standard Time
Nightly meth treatment
Do cops who murder unarmed black men know them?
No
Do they claim the same defense that they were scared and get off?
Yes
The murder charge and conviction needs to set an example here. A cop has a deadly weapon. When they shoot at black men who are unarmed, they are intending to kill regardless of any other relationship.
No
Do they claim the same defense that they were scared and get off?
Yes
The murder charge and conviction needs to set an example here. A cop has a deadly weapon. When they shoot at black men who are unarmed, they are intending to kill regardless of any other relationship.
That is part of what Jonestown was about. It was an experiment on mind control and also an experiment on how to infiltrate and disrupt black organizations. But as for them creating assassins. Today's Christians are tomorrow's assassins. In Jonestown the men walking around with the weapons to make sure nobody escapes and that they work everyday. They were Jim Jones personal lovers. They were totally brainwashed. And there was no more manhood left in them. So that made sure everybody ended up like them and Jim stays the only man or heterosexual there. They was to believe he was the only man or heterosexual in the world. He said that he would be their God until they realize that they are God. Same whites have been doing for 6 thousand years.
Lie so much that the lies become the truth that everybody lives by. Tell certain lies over and over enough it becomes the truth.
When she got on the witness stand I could clearly see she was totally lying. But the question you asked is puzzling me. Actually no sex was talked about by the official people until the court case started. That was the affair that her and the other officer were having. To shoot a man relaxing in his apartment like that something else is involved.
When it comes down to not knowing shit we take it as normal all through our lives. Somebody posted about the million people that signed the petition to bomb rush area 51. And then in the Mike Brown case some of the blacks realize that people came to Ferguson to actually kill them. Some of them moved and some of them had enough sense to start organizing in secrecy. Even parts of Africa realize that the only way for truth to be revealed and for them to actually dominate their land and resources is for them to go toe to toe with the with devils and the other races that have become devil advocates.
The general thing about what is really going on with the rule and domination of devils (whites) is you do not know, you do not want to know. Some people are still out playing right now and actually think they are free. But some of us have no choice but to keep trying for real freedom. And being black keep struggling for total separation. Shit blacks for generations have not even been allowed to think for themselves. And we resent when they rise up blacks who do the bidding for these devils. Image being put in a position to sell a whole country out.
Christians? Who said anything about Christians? I didn't say anything about Christans and I'm sure TBA didn't say anything about Christians either.
Lol have an open mind. There is a type of brainwashing that has always been among us. I see the main thing you saw of what I wrote was Christians. But anyway there are people in America that have guns legally and they are those that have no choice but to have them illegally. I did 3 years in the military. But before I went in I was out there trying to sell drugs and I was using drugs. The only reason I ended up in the military was because they though I was one of them. Same with most of blacks. Whites feel that we are all one of them now. But I could say a lot of about some of the video you had on your post but it probably would not be understood. All the money and resources I get I use to improve myself and work more toward trying to not only flip the money but build certain things. Besides businesses we should build our own protection. I can start something similar to a panther party or build security in a different way. Working to support our enemies to protect us is not normal.Christians? Who said anything about Christians? I didn't say anything about Christans and I'm sure TBA didn't say anything about Christians either.
But anyway brainwashing is powerful. Doing like the frog in the boiler and relaxing until he begins to boil.
hell no
So do you believe that she specifically targeted him?
I don’t believe that she mistook his apartment for hers, but I also don’t believe that she specifically targeted him. At least there is littler evidence to support that she did specifically targeted him.
I think this stank bitch specifically targeted the brother. If evidence is lacking it is intentional.
Watching the Opening Statements....Raw for the Clerk, BTW
I like this DA. Wish he was there for Trayvon Martin..
Damn now that was a good opening argument. If that woman is found not guilty or gets a 2 year sentence then ONCE AGAIN they will have proven that to them BLACK LIVES DON’T MATTER..SMH
I think this stank bitch specifically targeted the brother. If evidence is lacking it is intentional.
I think the prosecutor said he stayed in the apartment above her (correct me if I’m wrong). That would be the only minor connection they would have if they didn’t know each other.
If she specifically targeted him, then there is a connection somewhere unless we just roll with the predatory way. And she went well out her way to get him.
Plus with his door not being completely closed or locked mean that his fate was met by coincidence.
I’m not caping for this bitch, btw. I just asking questions to help fill in gaps where stuff doesn’t make any sense.
The deleted text messages is telling too.