FLAT EARTH!!!: Yes Niggas I'm Still Here... The Re-Up... Get Yo' Popcorn...

cashwhisperer

My favorite key is E♭
BGOL Investor
Really? This is basic high school science man. It's called jet streams in the polar area caused by rotation of the earth.
As for flight routes, if you ever went into a control tower or initiated a flight route, you would know if you go a straight path that you can circle the globe going one direction. You don't hit a wall lol. Also flights would be different if the world was flat. There would be direct routes and faster. If you ever taken a flight and measured the time it would take against the world being flat, there is a huge difference.
Unless your argument is that airlines circle around in the air wasting fuel for no reason just to keep the charade up lol. Stop it. This is logic but of course you will not acknowledge it. If you were smart and just ignorant of something, you would say ah now I get it

okay, on jet streams.....

check out this video...



the link to the website in the video btw....

http://earth.nullschool.net/#current/wind/surface/level/azimuthal_equidistant=0.00,90.00,100

Show me ONE recorded occurrence in recorded history of an aircraft or ship traversing the planet from North to South, rather than East to West.

I've been in a flight tower. My dad was president of a college that have an aviation program. Used to be in there all the time and participated in the summer program.

Explain to me how flight routes would be different. Have YOU "ever taken a flight and measured the time it would take against the world being flat"?...while you're talking about it...

Okay, why would flights circle in the air wasting fuel?? That would mean they were trying to make it seem like flights were longer than they were. On a flat earth model they would do the opposite, try to make the trips shorter, seeing that Santiago, Chile is a loooong way from Sydney, Austraila on a flat earth vs a round earth. Explain your logic behind that because it doesn't make any sense to me.

Keep calling me names while providing no real explanations. It really helps to prove your intellect. :rolleyes2:

Flat_earth.png
 

cashwhisperer

My favorite key is E♭
BGOL Investor
It amazes me how emotional yall get about this shit when it comes up. All kind of name-calling and character assassinations, but no real intellectual discourse.
 

Confucius

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
Well, first, I never SAID I have a theory of the flat earth. I don't know where you're getting that from.

Empirical evidence is the truth that theory must mimic, not the other way around. So all I'm looking at is what's there, what's observable. And subsequently asking questions based off of observations.

But I already put 2 points out there, 3 really and you've not proven either false, only hurled insults. That's not scientific method and wouldn't hold up in a court of law. It's not on me to explain any theories to you.

Either prove me wrong or I won. Point. Blank. Period.

Sandman+vs+Cosby.png


Bring It.
I don't need to reinvent the wheel...or explain why you are wrong...look at any of the NASA videos. And before you say they are faked again, where is YOUR proof? Otherwise you are an unemployed troll trying to pass time.
 

cashwhisperer

My favorite key is E♭
BGOL Investor
I don't need to reinvent the wheel...or explain why you are wrong...look at any of the NASA videos. And before you say they are faked again, where is YOUR proof? Otherwise you are an unemployed troll trying to pass time.

Show me ANY NASA video that shows a round earth and I will prove to you why it's not.

200_s.gif


lol, yall BLINDLY trust NASA, a 60-year old organization started by NAZI scientists.....let that sink in for a minute.
 

crossovernegro

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
If the earth were flat, wouldn't someone, at some point, from some country (government or private citizen) be able to get pictures from way up there to show the flat earth? Surely, some flat earther is interested in showing us actual visual proof. ....and why aren't the other planets and moons we can see flat?


It amazes me how emotional yall get about this shit when it comes up. All kind of name-calling and character assassinations, but no real intellectual discourse.
 

Day_Carver

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
I just want dmoney to explain to me this; now that I know the earth is flat:hmm: how does this help me and my folks with racism and other issues that are going on every day??
 

cashwhisperer

My favorite key is E♭
BGOL Investor
If the earth were flat, wouldn't someone, at some point, from some country (government or private citizen) be able to get pictures from way up there to show the flat earth? Surely, some flat earther is interested in showing us actual visual proof. ....and why aren't the other planets and moons we can see flat?

That makes perfect sense until you examine the Antarctic Treaty of 1961.
 

lazarus

waking people up
BGOL Investor
okay, on jet streams.....

check out this video...



the link to the website in the video btw....

http://earth.nullschool.net/#current/wind/surface/level/azimuthal_equidistant=0.00,90.00,100

Show me ONE recorded occurrence in recorded history of an aircraft or ship traversing the planet from North to South, rather than East to West.

I've been in a flight tower. My dad was president of a college that have an aviation program. Used to be in there all the time and participated in the summer program.

Explain to me how flight routes would be different. Have YOU "ever taken a flight and measured the time it would take against the world being flat"?...while you're talking about it...

Okay, why would flights circle in the air wasting fuel?? That would mean they were trying to make it seem like flights were longer than they were. On a flat earth model they would do the opposite, try to make the trips shorter, seeing that Santiago, Chile is a loooong way from Sydney, Austraila on a flat earth vs a round earth. Explain your logic behind that because it doesn't make any sense to me.

Keep calling me names while providing no real explanations. It really helps to prove your intellect. :rolleyes2:

Flat_earth.png

You're hopeless. You're not even making sense. Its tiresome to explain something to you because you come back with three more dumbass questions. You are fighting logic.i can't help you man. You've lost it. Good luck.
 

ViCiouS

Rising Star
BGOL Patreon Investor
okay, on jet streams.....

check out this video...



the link to the website in the video btw....

http://earth.nullschool.net/#current/wind/surface/level/azimuthal_equidistant=0.00,90.00,100

Show me ONE recorded occurrence in recorded history of an aircraft or ship traversing the planet from North to South, rather than East to West.

I've been in a flight tower. My dad was president of a college that have an aviation program. Used to be in there all the time and participated in the summer program.

Explain to me how flight routes would be different. Have YOU "ever taken a flight and measured the time it would take against the world being flat"?...while you're talking about it...

Okay, why would flights circle in the air wasting fuel?? That would mean they were trying to make it seem like flights were longer than they were. On a flat earth model they would do the opposite, try to make the trips shorter, seeing that Santiago, Chile is a loooong way from Sydney, Austraila on a flat earth vs a round earth. Explain your logic behind that because it doesn't make any sense to me.

Keep calling me names while providing no real explanations. It really helps to prove your intellect. :rolleyes2:

Flat_earth.png

your entire post is idiotic

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polar_route


A polar route is an aircraft route across the uninhabited polar ice cap regions. The term "polar route" was originally applied to great circle routes...

Today[edit]
The American Federal Aviation Administration now defines the North Polar area of operations as the area north of 78 deg north latitude,[15] which is north of Alaska and most of Siberia.

Aircraft like the Boeing 747-400, 747-8, 777-200ER, 777-200LR and 777-300ER as well as the Airbus A340, A350 and A380, with ranges of around 7,000 nautical miles (13,000 km) or more, are required to travel the long distances nonstop between suitable airports.[16] Before this era, all flights from North America to Asia were routed around the Communist bloc using a series of tracks between Alaska and Japan.

Arctic polar routes are now common on airlines connecting Asian cities (Bangkok, Beijing, Dubai, Abu Dhabi, Guangzhou, Hong Kong, New Delhi, Mumbai, Seoul, Shanghai, Singapore, Taipei and Tokyo) to North American cities (New York, Boston, Chicago, Detroit, Houston, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Seattle, Toronto, Vancouver and Washington, D.C.). Emirates flies nonstop from Dubai to the US West Coast (San Francisco, Seattle and Los Angeles), coming within a few degrees of latitude of the North Pole.[17][18]

Antarctica[edit]
Few airlines fly between cities having a great circle route over Antarctica. Direct flights between South Africa and New Zealand would overfly Antarctica, but no airline has scheduled such flights. LAN Airlines flies nonstop between Auckland, Sydney and Santiago, Air New Zealand flies nonstop between Auckland and Buenos Aires starting December 1 2015, and Qantas flies nonstop between Sydney and Santiago, the most southerly polar route. Depending on winds, these reach 55 degrees south latitude, but other times 71 degrees, which is enough to cross the polar ice cap.[19][better source needed]

Depending on the winds, the Qantas flight QF 63 from Sydney to Johannesburg sometimes flies over the Antarctic Circle to latitude 71 degrees as well and allowing views of the icecap.[20]

Operational considerations[edit]
The FAA's policy letter Guidance for Polar Operations (March 5, 2001) outlines a number of special requirements for polar flight, which includes two cold-weather suits, special communication capability, designation of arctic diversion airports and firm recovery plans for stranded passengers, and fuel freeze strategy and monitoring requirements.[15]

Jet fuel freeze temperatures range between -40 and -50 °C. These temperatures are frequently encountered at cruise altitude throughout the world with no effect since the fuel retains heat from lower elevations, but the intense cold and extended duration of polar flights may cause fuel temperature to approach its freezing point. Jet A grade with a maximum freeze point of -40 °C is used in the U.S., while Jet A1 grade with a maximum freeze point of -47 °C is used elsewhere.[21] Modern long-distance airliners are equipped to alert flight crew when fuel temperatures reach 3 °C above these levels. The crew must then change altitude, though in some cases due to the low stratosphere over polar regions and its inversion properties the air may actually be somewhat warmer at higher altitudes.[15]

The alerts are typically set at 3 °C above the specified maximum freeze point. This provides a 3 °C safety margin from the solidification temperature. However, fuels produced at the refineries are often better than the spec values; for example, it is not uncommon to find Jet A fuels that have measured freeze point better (colder) than the specified maximum of -40°C. In that way, the safety margin is even larger than 3 °C. On the other hand, the temperature probe that delivers fuel temperature information to the flight deck is not located in the coldest part of the fuel tanks. The difference between the recorded and the coldest fuel temperature varies depending on a variety of factors, especially the circulation of fuel in the tanks and duration of cold soak. It is, therefore, prudent to have a safety margin.

For polar flights, FAA allows,[22] under certain conditions, the measured freeze point be used instead of assuming the spec value in ASTM D1655. This gives the airlines more flexibility in flight planning.
 

cashwhisperer

My favorite key is E♭
BGOL Investor
I just want dmoney to explain to me this; now that I know the earth is flat:hmm: how does this help me and my folks with racism and other issues that are going on every day??

Well, think about it like this.

Why would the world's most powerful governments get together in 1961 and ban all travel to Antarctica? This is after Admiral Byrd came back and said "There are 2 more continents beyond Antarctica, rich with all the natural resources we'll ever need". After he said that on national TV, they shut the resources off to the entires world, including large corporations.

Now, why in the FUCK would they do that?

Here's a theory...maybe they're pulling the wool over the world's eyes. We all know now that JP Morgan suppressed Telsa's free wireless energy because he could put a meter on Thomas Edison's version. We ALL could not be paying electric bills, yet we do. So what if that was done on a higher scale?

What if fossil fuels weren't real and the world's oil was as plentiful as water? Why would we be paying $4 a gallon if that were a reality?



What if the white supremacists have fooled us that badly? If that were the truth, wouldn't it make you rethink your whole life? Wouldn't it make the whole world wake up, especially people of color, in a way that we haven't seen?.....

just a theory...but lemme ask you this....

If it were possible, would you put it past cacs?
 

cashwhisperer

My favorite key is E♭
BGOL Investor
You're hopeless. You're not even making sense. Its tiresome to explain something to you because you come back with three more dumbass questions. You are fighting logic.i can't help you man. You've lost it. Good luck.

Evidence. Observable evidence. You didn't bring it so....I won. Bye.
 

cashwhisperer

My favorite key is E♭
BGOL Investor
If the earth were flat, wouldn't someone, at some point, from some country (government or private citizen) be able to get pictures from way up there to show the flat earth? Surely, some flat earther is interested in showing us actual visual proof. ....and why aren't the other planets and moons we can see flat?

My bad, sorry I didn't answer your question in full.

The truth is, we don't have the technology to go high enough to actually see a flat OR ball earth it it's entirety. No country does. What you can do however is observe footage we DO have to determine if we can see a curve or not. Which I was saying, show me ANY footage from NASA and I will PROVE to you why it doesn't show a curved earth.
 

Day_Carver

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
Well, think about it like this.

Why would the world's most powerful governments get together in 1961 and ban all travel to Antarctica? This is after Admiral Byrd came back and said "There are 2 more continents beyond Antarctica, rich with all the natural resources we'll ever need". After he said that on national TV, they shut the resources off to the entires world, including large corporations.

Now, why in the FUCK would they do that?

Here's a theory...maybe they're pulling the wool over the world's eyes. We all know now that JP Morgan suppressed Telsa's free wireless energy because he could put a meter on Thomas Edison's version. We ALL could not be paying electric bills, yet we do. So what if that was done on a higher scale?

What if fossil fuels weren't real and the world's oil was as plentiful as water? Why would we be paying $4 a gallon if that were a reality?



What if the white supremacists have fooled us that badly? If that were the truth, wouldn't it make you rethink your whole life? Wouldn't it make the whole world wake up, especially people of color, in a way that we haven't seen?.....

just a theory...but lemme ask you this....

If it were possible, would you put it past cacs?

I get that; and I get all of what you are saying; but again how does this help end racism; how does this help with day to day life; listen we all know that there are plenty of full of shit things out there that the government/rich greedy white people are doing; we pay for water, think about that for a minute; so i get it; but knowing that the earth is "flat"; how does that change your life???
 

Day_Carver

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
Well, think about it like this.

Why would the world's most powerful governments get together in 1961 and ban all travel to Antarctica? This is after Admiral Byrd came back and said "There are 2 more continents beyond Antarctica, rich with all the natural resources we'll ever need". After he said that on national TV, they shut the resources off to the entires world, including large corporations.

Now, why in the FUCK would they do that?

Here's a theory...maybe they're pulling the wool over the world's eyes. We all know now that JP Morgan suppressed Telsa's free wireless energy because he could put a meter on Thomas Edison's version. We ALL could not be paying electric bills, yet we do. So what if that was done on a higher scale?

What if fossil fuels weren't real and the world's oil was as plentiful as water? Why would we be paying $4 a gallon if that were a reality?



What if the white supremacists have fooled us that badly? If that were the truth, wouldn't it make you rethink your whole life? Wouldn't it make the whole world wake up, especially people of color, in a way that we haven't seen?.....

just a theory...but lemme ask you this....

If it were possible, would you put it past cacs?

Interesting video though...
 

cashwhisperer

My favorite key is E♭
BGOL Investor
your entire post is idiotic

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polar_route


A polar route is an aircraft route across the uninhabited polar ice cap regions. The term "polar route" was originally applied to great circle routes...

Today[edit]
The American Federal Aviation Administration now defines the North Polar area of operations as the area north of 78 deg north latitude,[15] which is north of Alaska and most of Siberia.

Aircraft like the Boeing 747-400, 747-8, 777-200ER, 777-200LR and 777-300ER as well as the Airbus A340, A350 and A380, with ranges of around 7,000 nautical miles (13,000 km) or more, are required to travel the long distances nonstop between suitable airports.[16] Before this era, all flights from North America to Asia were routed around the Communist bloc using a series of tracks between Alaska and Japan.

Arctic polar routes are now common on airlines connecting Asian cities (Bangkok, Beijing, Dubai, Abu Dhabi, Guangzhou, Hong Kong, New Delhi, Mumbai, Seoul, Shanghai, Singapore, Taipei and Tokyo) to North American cities (New York, Boston, Chicago, Detroit, Houston, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Seattle, Toronto, Vancouver and Washington, D.C.). Emirates flies nonstop from Dubai to the US West Coast (San Francisco, Seattle and Los Angeles), coming within a few degrees of latitude of the North Pole.[17][18]

Antarctica[edit]
Few airlines fly between cities having a great circle route over Antarctica. Direct flights between South Africa and New Zealand would overfly Antarctica, but no airline has scheduled such flights. LAN Airlines flies nonstop between Auckland, Sydney and Santiago, Air New Zealand flies nonstop between Auckland and Buenos Aires starting December 1 2015, and Qantas flies nonstop between Sydney and Santiago, the most southerly polar route. Depending on winds, these reach 55 degrees south latitude, but other times 71 degrees, which is enough to cross the polar ice cap.[19][better source needed]

Depending on the winds, the Qantas flight QF 63 from Sydney to Johannesburg sometimes flies over the Antarctic Circle to latitude 71 degrees as well and allowing views of the icecap.[20]

Operational considerations[edit]
The FAA's policy letter Guidance for Polar Operations (March 5, 2001) outlines a number of special requirements for polar flight, which includes two cold-weather suits, special communication capability, designation of arctic diversion airports and firm recovery plans for stranded passengers, and fuel freeze strategy and monitoring requirements.[15]

Jet fuel freeze temperatures range between -40 and -50 °C. These temperatures are frequently encountered at cruise altitude throughout the world with no effect since the fuel retains heat from lower elevations, but the intense cold and extended duration of polar flights may cause fuel temperature to approach its freezing point. Jet A grade with a maximum freeze point of -40 °C is used in the U.S., while Jet A1 grade with a maximum freeze point of -47 °C is used elsewhere.[21] Modern long-distance airliners are equipped to alert flight crew when fuel temperatures reach 3 °C above these levels. The crew must then change altitude, though in some cases due to the low stratosphere over polar regions and its inversion properties the air may actually be somewhat warmer at higher altitudes.[15]

The alerts are typically set at 3 °C above the specified maximum freeze point. This provides a 3 °C safety margin from the solidification temperature. However, fuels produced at the refineries are often better than the spec values; for example, it is not uncommon to find Jet A fuels that have measured freeze point better (colder) than the specified maximum of -40°C. In that way, the safety margin is even larger than 3 °C. On the other hand, the temperature probe that delivers fuel temperature information to the flight deck is not located in the coldest part of the fuel tanks. The difference between the recorded and the coldest fuel temperature varies depending on a variety of factors, especially the circulation of fuel in the tanks and duration of cold soak. It is, therefore, prudent to have a safety margin.

For polar flights, FAA allows,[22] under certain conditions, the measured freeze point be used instead of assuming the spec value in ASTM D1655. This gives the airlines more flexibility in flight planning.


Okay....First of all, did you even read carefully what you posted?? Because it kind of supports my argument.

Antarctica[edit]
Few airlines fly between cities having a great circle route over Antarctica. Direct flights between South Africa and New Zealand would overfly Antarctica, but no airline has scheduled such flights. LAN Airlines flies nonstop between Auckland, Sydney and Santiago, Air New Zealand flies nonstop between Auckland and Buenos Aires starting December 1 2015, and Qantas flies nonstop between Sydney and Santiago, the most southerly polar route. Depending on winds, these reach 55 degrees south latitude, but other times 71 degrees, which is enough to cross the polar ice cap.[19][better source needed]

Depending on the winds, the Qantas flight QF 63 from Sydney to Johannesburg sometimes flies over the Antarctic Circle to latitude 71 degrees as well and allowing views of the icecap.[20]

First off, this is a wikipedia article. And the sources cited by one of them "better source needed".

Now, 55 degrees south is not enough to cross the southern polar cap.

ZfjJ4XdLZJTLwhRnbUjEvdVp.jpeg


71 degrees south is also not low enough, although it is enough to get close enough to get close the outer edge of the ice cap of Antartica, but that doesn't mean you cross it. And if you click on the source, you'll see that the source cited makes NO MENTION of flying over the polar caps...

so......

what else you got?
 

ViCiouS

Rising Star
BGOL Patreon Investor
Okay....First of all, did you even read carefully what you posted?? Because it kind of supports my argument.

Antarctica[edit]
Few airlines fly between cities having a great circle route over Antarctica. Direct flights between South Africa and New Zealand would overfly Antarctica, but no airline has scheduled such flights. LAN Airlines flies nonstop between Auckland, Sydney and Santiago, Air New Zealand flies nonstop between Auckland and Buenos Aires starting December 1 2015, and Qantas flies nonstop between Sydney and Santiago, the most southerly polar route. Depending on winds, these reach 55 degrees south latitude, but other times 71 degrees, which is enough to cross the polar ice cap.[19][better source needed]

Depending on the winds, the Qantas flight QF 63 from Sydney to Johannesburg sometimes flies over the Antarctic Circle to latitude 71 degrees as well and allowing views of the icecap.[20]

First off, this is a wikipedia article. And the sources cited by one of them "better source needed".

Now, 55 degrees south is not enough to cross the southern polar cap.

ZfjJ4XdLZJTLwhRnbUjEvdVp.jpeg


71 degrees south is also not low enough, although it is enough to get close enough to get close the outer edge of the ice cap of Antartica, but that doesn't mean you cross it. And if you click on the source, you'll see that the source cited makes NO MENTION of flying over the polar caps...

so......

what else you got?
you asked for documented north south travel - I gave you established flight plans -

any student that studied geometry can understand that traversing 55 degree lat between Argentina and NZ destroys a flat earth theory -

if I'm wrong, show me the math and then plot it on a flat earth map
 

cashwhisperer

My favorite key is E♭
BGOL Investor
T
I get that; and I get all of what you are saying; but again how does this help end racism; how does this help with day to day life; listen we all know that there are plenty of full of shit things out there that the government/rich greedy white people are doing; we pay for water, think about that for a minute; so i get it; but knowing that the earth is "flat"; how does that change your life???

To know the truth to your existence might be the key to your salvation. They got us buying and pursuing shit we don't even need, therefore giving up our power. There are plenty of reasons once you wrap your head around this shit.
 

cashwhisperer

My favorite key is E♭
BGOL Investor
you asked for documented north south travel - I gave you established flight plans -

any student that studied geometry can understand that traversing 55 degree lat between Argentina and NZ destroys a flat earth theory -

if I'm wrong, show me the math and then plot it on a flat earth map

EXPLAIN IT THEN. I doubt you can.
 

cashwhisperer

My favorite key is E♭
BGOL Investor
you asked for documented north south travel - I gave you established flight plans -

any student that studied geometry can understand that traversing 55 degree lat between Argentina and NZ destroys a flat earth theory -

if I'm wrong, show me the math and then plot it on a flat earth map

EXPLAIN IT THEN. I doubt you can.
 

fonzerrillii

BGOL Elite Poster
Platinum Member
OK What is going on in here now? I thought OP was the only one in this thread Pro- flat Earth?

Cashwhisperer, weren't you posting youtube vids where you were laughing at the Cacs that believed in this shit? I'm just trying to figure out how this went from a one sided affair to a discussion.
 

fonzerrillii

BGOL Elite Poster
Platinum Member
I mean not to derail this even further, but lets just take out flight paths and SHEOL and anything else.

There is indisputable evidence that the earth is round and it is probably something that we have seen with our own eyes. "Lunar Eclipse"...

One of the oldest proofs of the Earth's shape, occurs during every lunar eclipse. A lunar eclipse occurs when the Moon passes directly behind the Earth into its shadow.
When a full Moon occurs in the plane of Earth's orbit, the Moon slowly moves through Earth's shadow.
Every time that shadow is seen, its edge is round. Since the beginning of time, its edge has been round. The only thing that always projects a round shadow is a sphere.

If the Earth were truly flat then there is no way that a Lunar Eclipse could even happen. One would have to say that the Moon is Fake to debunk this principle since I'm pretty sure that everyone this board has seen a Lunar Eclipse in their life.

And we are opening up an entirely different discussion if we start talking about the Moon being fake.
 

cashwhisperer

My favorite key is E♭
BGOL Investor
OK What is going on in here now? I thought OP was the only one in this thread Pro- flat Earth?

Cashwhisperer, weren't you posting youtube vids where you were laughing at the Cacs that believed in this shit? I'm just trying to figure out how this went from a one sided affair to a discussion.

Here's the thing. Watch the videos and decide for yourself.
you asked for documented north south travel - I gave you established flight plans -

any student that studied geometry can understand that traversing 55 degree lat between Argentina and NZ destroys a flat earth theory -

if I'm wrong, show me the math and then plot it on a flat earth map



 

lazarus

waking people up
BGOL Investor
If it's basic intelligence, WHY CAN'T YOU EXPLAIN IT??
i explained it perfectly. It is you that can't comprehend. Believing in pseudoscience. SMH.

this would help you more than any discussion here:

Denialism


In the psychology of human behavior, denialism is a person's choice to deny reality, as a way to avoid a psychologically uncomfortable truth.[1] Denialism is an essentially irrational action that withholds the validation of an historical experience or event, by the person refusing to accept an empirically verifiable reality.[2] In the sciences, denialism is the rejection of basic facts and concepts that are undisputed, well-supported parts of the scientific consensus on a subject, in favor of radical and controversial ideas.[3] The terms Holocaust denialism and AIDS denialism describe the denial of the facts and the reality of the subject matters,[4]and the term climate change denialist is applied to people who argue against the scientific consensus that the global warming of planet Earth is a real and occurring event primarily caused by human activity.[5] The forms of denialism present the common feature of the person rejecting overwhelming evidence and the generation of political controversy with attempts to deny the existence of consensus.[6][7] The motivations and causes of denialism include religion and self-interest (economic, political, financial) and defence mechanisms meant to protect the psyche of the denialist against mentally disturbing facts and ideas.[8][9]
 

cashwhisperer

My favorite key is E♭
BGOL Investor
I mean not to derail this even further, but lets just take out flight paths and SHEOL and anything else.

There is indisputable evidence that the earth is round and it is probably something that we have seen with our own eyes. "Lunar Eclipse"...

One of the oldest proofs of the Earth's shape, occurs during every lunar eclipse. A lunar eclipse occurs when the Moon passes directly behind the Earth into its shadow.
When a full Moon occurs in the plane of Earth's orbit, the Moon slowly moves through Earth's shadow.
Every time that shadow is seen, its edge is round. Since the beginning of time, its edge has been round. The only thing that always projects a round shadow is a sphere.

If the Earth were truly flat then there is no way that a Lunar Eclipse could even happen. One would have to say that the Moon is Fake to debunk this principle since I'm pretty sure that everyone this board has seen a Lunar Eclipse in their life.

And we are opening up an entirely different discussion if we start talking about the Moon being fake.



 
Last edited:

cashwhisperer

My favorite key is E♭
BGOL Investor
i explained it perfectly. It is you that can't comprehend. Believing in pseudoscience. SMH.

this would help you more than any discussion here:

Denialism


In the psychology of human behavior, denialism is a person's choice to deny reality, as a way to avoid a psychologically uncomfortable truth.[1] Denialism is an essentially irrational action that withholds the validation of an historical experience or event, by the person refusing to accept an empirically verifiable reality.[2] In the sciences, denialism is the rejection of basic facts and concepts that are undisputed, well-supported parts of the scientific consensus on a subject, in favor of radical and controversial ideas.[3] The terms Holocaust denialism and AIDS denialism describe the denial of the facts and the reality of the subject matters,[4]and the term climate change denialist is applied to people who argue against the scientific consensus that the global warming of planet Earth is a real and occurring event primarily caused by human activity.[5] The forms of denialism present the common feature of the person rejecting overwhelming evidence and the generation of political controversy with attempts to deny the existence of consensus.[6][7] The motivations and causes of denialism include religion and self-interest (economic, political, financial) and defence mechanisms meant to protect the psyche of the denialist against mentally disturbing facts and ideas.[8][9]


With all due respect, apply that to yourself. You are in a DEEEEEEEEP state of denial right now. It goes all the way back to 1st grade. But you'll awaken out of this amnesia soon.
 

ViCiouS

Rising Star
BGOL Patreon Investor
EXPLAIN IT THEN. I doubt you can.
:rolleyes2:
I challenged you to show your math and plot the trip on a flat earth map and you get childish?
:giggle:
please show me how is it possible to fly from Argentina to New Zealand in 11.75 hours over a flat earth?

back to your original point -more on north south circumnavigations:

TAG Global claims record for polar circumnavigation
by Charles Alcock
- December 31, 2008, 6:20 AM
http://www.ainonline.com/aviation-n...g-global-claims-record-polar-circumnavigation

TAG Group vice president Aziz Ojjeh and a team of four other pilots broke a
31-year-old speed record for a pole-to-pole circumnavigation of the globe in late November. The TransPolar08 crew circled the globe over the North and South Poles in a Bombardier Global Express, chopping 95 minutes off the record previously held by a Pan Am Boeing 747SP that made the trip in October 1977.
________________________________________________
on a flat earth how were these recorded flights possible?


VIVnMJt.png


xYpoU06.png
 

cashwhisperer

My favorite key is E♭
BGOL Investor
:rolleyes2:
I challenged you to show your math and plot the trip on a flat earth map and you get childish?
:giggle:
please show me how is it possible to fly from Argentina to New Zealand in 11.75 hours over a flat earth?

back to your original point -more on north south circumnavigations:

TAG Global claims record for polar circumnavigation
by Charles Alcock
- December 31, 2008, 6:20 AM
http://www.ainonline.com/aviation-n...g-global-claims-record-polar-circumnavigation

TAG Group vice president Aziz Ojjeh and a team of four other pilots broke a
31-year-old speed record for a pole-to-pole circumnavigation of the globe in late November. The TransPolar08 crew circled the globe over the North and South Poles in a Bombardier Global Express, chopping 95 minutes off the record previously held by a Pan Am Boeing 747SP that made the trip in October 1977.
________________________________________________
on a flat earth how were these recorded flights possible?


VIVnMJt.png


xYpoU06.png

This is how it's possible




:grin::grin::grin:
 

cashwhisperer

My favorite key is E♭
BGOL Investor
So the earth if flat, now what's the endgame? You want all maps changed to reflect a flat earth? Flat earth day? What's the endgame here?

Hmmm....and NASA has spent 1 Trillion of your tax dollars since Apollo 16....brought to you by 400 years of slavery....think about that and why you should consider your endgame....

And if they weren't spending it on going to Mars...what were they spending it on?
 
Top