There's two of them ? 
FLAT EARTH!!!: Yes Niggas I'm Still Here... The Re-Up... Get Yo' Popcorn...
- Thread starter 14damoney
- Start date
Look if you don't want to, I understand. But I've asked what, 5 or 6 times now?
Mighty suspect you can't deliver something so simple.
School is hard.There's two of them ?
You would be correct about the fossil fuels being plentiful as water...oil regenerates. It's like the earth's blood. It's not a fossil fuel. Methane is no fossil fuel. If it was, how is it present on Neptune and Uranus?
However, that has nothing to do with a flat earth. Dude people send cameras up on helium baloons and you can see the earth's curvature. Read the descriptions offered by people who flew the concord...the could see the curve. You are being dumb on purpose...if you post data refuting that the world is round then you win...with all of these extreme x sports white boys, you don't think they have balloons and planes that fly high enough to debunk flat earth in the 1960s?
no, what's mighty suspect is that you can't do it on your own. We already know your move is to discredit any pic. Like I said before, you are going to argue against all logic placed in front of you. It's pointless to have a discussion with you if you don't believe in source material. No one can convince you otherwise. To you, the whole world is on a conspiracy to make people believe the world is circular for kicks. Every scientist and Mensa member is not as intelligent as you in your mind. You are the smartest guy in the world after watching a few youtube videos. And that illogical thought makes sense to you.
You need to bring a photo of flat earth as well...ice ring and all
You just made all that shit up.
I'm GLAD you brought that up.
Exhibit A.
Show me where the earth curves in this video. This is 24 miles above the earth. Give me the mark.
I already said neither can be produced. Unless you wanna cough up of those NASA photos..
So out of curiosity, I decided to read some of these Flat Earth Society blogs and Plate Tectonics seem to be stumper.
You can't fuck with obvious science and Nasa has nothing to do with this one.
You can't fuck with obvious science and Nasa has nothing to do with this one.
flat earthers are some of the MOST retarded people!
stop wasting peeps time trying to distract with this garbage!
where does the sun go at night? explain the 4 seasons! how does the sun rise
in the east & set in the west? you can see the sun/moon is circular, but earth flat, please stop!
stop wasting peeps time trying to distract with this garbage!
where does the sun go at night? explain the 4 seasons! how does the sun rise
in the east & set in the west? you can see the sun/moon is circular, but earth flat, please stop!
I'm seeing the contrary. But I want to be absolutely certain before I post my findings. If I don't post it tonight I will by morning.
Last edited:
Distract?? Ain't nobody making yall come in this thread! You pay attention to what you want to, grown-ass man.
And all of what you said can be easily explained. I'll be back to break it down.
Note: A flat earth model is still 3-dimensional, the will still be similarities in a 2-D esque flat circle and a 3-d esque sphere.
What's retarded is how the reactions in this thread remind me of how Christians react when you start telling them things in the bible aren't true.
Here's one video that answers where the sun goes at night.
Sun rising in the east and setting in the west. I'll get to the seasons.
Distract?? Ain't nobody making yall come in this thread! You pay attention to what you want to, grown-ass man.
And all of what you said can be easily explained. I'll be back to break it down.
Note: A flat earth model is still 3-dimensional, the will still be similarities in a 2-D esque flat circle and a 3-d esque sphere.
What's retarded is how the reactions in this thread remind me of how Christians react when you start telling them things in the bible aren't true.
Here's one video that answers where the sun goes at night.
Sun rising in the east and setting in the west. I'll get to the seasons.
The sun rotates around a flat earth at circular motion above? LMAO. Damn I didn't think you were this stupid. This is funny as shit! You ever seen a sunSET or sunRISE? lmao. The sun doesn't move to side to side like it's doing the electric slide.
I'm GLAD you brought that up.
Exhibit A.
Show me where the earth curves in this video. This is 24 miles above the earth. Give me the mark.
its curved on the fucking screenshot
...i dont have to hit play. Goodnite
its curved on the fucking screenshot
Right, now play this video. It's que'd for the 7:40 mark. Notice what a 15mm fish eye can do?
The 14mm is a "rectilinear" lens produces a straight horizon background whereas the 15mm fish eye distorts. You might wanna check that GoPro camera they used to see if it was a fish eye....even though it obviously is.
Forget about the screenshot for a sec. Answer me this question. Why does the horizon curve backwards at the 4:00 min mark? (prehh play, que'd)
Last edited:
The video shows it doing that though....you probably didn't watch it though, huh?
How is this even possible?
If the Sun only rotates across the direct top surface of the earth, then that means that the underside of the earth would get zero heat from the sun. Since we obviously don't have a core under the flat earth theory, then that means that the underside would be as cold as space. Space can be negative -455 degrees . Which would mean that the magma closest to the bottom layer would instantly freeze, while also freezing any layer flowing on top..... since magma wouldn't be able to rotate in a circular pattern to prevent it from hardening. So this would create a layer cake effect..... until magma finds an area to escape or it hardens. Under this theory there would be only one area of escape (the sunny side), as the layer of crust on the underside of the Earth would be completely covered in frozen magna (an iron shield effect). Hell under this approach, there is no way that Humanity would be alive as all of the magma would have escaped to the surface millions of years ago when the continents were forming. So technically we should be in a river of lava right now.
Also how in the world do we even have magma under this Flat Theory. Magma is only created and sustained due to pressure (gravity) and the Earth's rotation. You can't create pressure with a purely flat surface and you can't sustain magma without spherical rotation. Magma isn't like water... it will harden if it doesn't move. Since the Earth isn't rotating under the Flat Theory, then magma can't be sustained.. meaning there can't be any geothermic energy. Without geothermic energy, you can't have volcanoes, steam plants, or even hot springs. But I've seen a Steam plant and I've definitely been to the hot springs in Arkansas. So how is this theory still possible.
If the Sun only rotates across the direct top surface of the earth, then that means that the underside of the earth would get zero heat from the sun. Since we obviously don't have a core under the flat earth theory, then that means that the underside would be as cold as space. Space can be negative -455 degrees . Which would mean that the magma closest to the bottom layer would instantly freeze, while also freezing any layer flowing on top..... since magma wouldn't be able to rotate in a circular pattern to prevent it from hardening. So this would create a layer cake effect..... until magma finds an area to escape or it hardens. Under this theory there would be only one area of escape (the sunny side), as the layer of crust on the underside of the Earth would be completely covered in frozen magna (an iron shield effect). Hell under this approach, there is no way that Humanity would be alive as all of the magma would have escaped to the surface millions of years ago when the continents were forming. So technically we should be in a river of lava right now.
Also how in the world do we even have magma under this Flat Theory. Magma is only created and sustained due to pressure (gravity) and the Earth's rotation. You can't create pressure with a purely flat surface and you can't sustain magma without spherical rotation. Magma isn't like water... it will harden if it doesn't move. Since the Earth isn't rotating under the Flat Theory, then magma can't be sustained.. meaning there can't be any geothermic energy. Without geothermic energy, you can't have volcanoes, steam plants, or even hot springs. But I've seen a Steam plant and I've definitely been to the hot springs in Arkansas. So how is this theory still possible.
Sorry. All of that has been debunked already. Magellan circumvented East to West, not North to South. East to West is always possible on a flat model.
I'll go thru point by point.
So how does three 90 degree angels get you back at the same spot again???? And why exactly are shadows cast different depending on where you stand on the globe?
I think it acts as a barometer on how the dumbing down of the public is working ..
Alright alright alright.
Flat earthers???
I am going to arrogantly proclaim myself as the first uneducated debunker of the failed notion.
Mr Supporter posted this gif.
I watched it go around a few times before I recognized the obvious.
Dude say something about 80000 feet ceiling and the sun source rides over the dome.
Well, why not just track the sun source with a telescope by it illumination after it is beyond the view of the naked eye.
THE LIGHT SOURCE SHOULD STILL BE VERY VISIBLE THRU A TELESCOPE FOR A MUCH GREATER DISTANCE AND A MUCH LONGER SPAN OF TIME JUST BY PIVOTING THE FOCUS POINT.
The light source will have no earth curvature to hide behind.
Flat earthers would have observable and repeatable evidence.
Flat earthers???
I am going to arrogantly proclaim myself as the first uneducated debunker of the failed notion.
Mr Supporter posted this gif.
I watched it go around a few times before I recognized the obvious.
Dude say something about 80000 feet ceiling and the sun source rides over the dome.
Well, why not just track the sun source with a telescope by it illumination after it is beyond the view of the naked eye.
THE LIGHT SOURCE SHOULD STILL BE VERY VISIBLE THRU A TELESCOPE FOR A MUCH GREATER DISTANCE AND A MUCH LONGER SPAN OF TIME JUST BY PIVOTING THE FOCUS POINT.
The light source will have no earth curvature to hide behind.
Flat earthers would have observable and repeatable evidence.
Their brain can only process five words you typed, tops..Alright alright alright.
Flat earthers???
I am going to arrogantly proclaim myself as the first uneducated debunking of the failed notion.
Mr Supporter posted this gif.
I watched it go around a few times before I recognized the obvious.
Dude say something about 80000 feet ceiling and the sun source rides over the dome.
Well, why not just track the sun source with a telescope by it illumination after it is beyond the view of the naked eye.
THE LIGHT SHOUR SHOULD STILL BE VERY VISIBLE THRU A TELESCOPE FOR A MUCH GREATER DISTANCE AND A MUCH LONGER SPAN OF TIME JUST BY PIVOTING THE FOCUS POINT.
The light source will have no earth curvature to hide behind.
Flat earthers would have observable and repeatable evidence.
How is this even possible?
If the Sun only rotates across the direct top surface of the earth, then that means that the underside of the earth would get zero heat from the sun. Since we obviously don't have a core under the flat earth theory, then that means that the underside would be as cold as space. Space can be negative -455 degrees . Which would mean that the magma closest to the bottom layer would instantly freeze, while also freezing any layer flowing on top..... since magma wouldn't be able to rotate in a circular pattern to prevent it from hardening. So this would create a layer cake effect..... until magma finds an area to escape or it hardens. Under this theory there would be only one area of escape (the sunny side), as the layer of crust on the underside of the Earth would be completely covered in frozen magna (an iron shield effect). Hell under this approach, there is no way that Humanity would be alive as all of the magma would have escaped to the surface millions of years ago when the continents were forming. So technically we should be in a river of lava right now.
Also how in the world do we even have magma under this Flat Theory. Magma is only created and sustained due to pressure (gravity) and the Earth's rotation. You can't create pressure with a purely flat surface and you can't sustain magma without spherical rotation. Magma isn't like water... it will harden if it doesn't move. Since the Earth isn't rotating under the Flat Theory, then magma can't be sustained.. meaning there can't be any geothermic energy. Without geothermic energy, you can't have volcanoes, steam plants, or even hot springs. But I've seen a Steam plant and I've definitely been to the hot springs in Arkansas. So how is this theory still possible.
Question. How deep do you think the flat earth"disc" is? You have no idea right?
Hey tard explain eclipses with that dumb ass model....
Actually I was going to ask you the same thing? How deep do you think it is? It is your theory. I'm just asking questions about it. I think we can both agree that the underside would have to be in direct contact with other space.
I think we agree that the Earth's crust isn't infinite (that would create an entirely different discussion).
I still don't grasp how magma can be formed without pressure, because you can't achieve that type of needed pressure with a flat earth. The underside would have to be able generate it's on pressure to do this and that would be impossible because there can't be any gravity on the underside. Therefore. all of the magma on the earth would have crystallized millions of years ago.
Alright alright alright.
Flat earthers???
I am going to arrogantly proclaim myself as the first uneducated debunker of the failed notion.
Mr Supporter posted this gif.
I watched it go around a few times before I recognized the obvious.
Dude say something about 80000 feet ceiling and the sun source rides over the dome.
Well, why not just track the sun source with a telescope by it illumination after it is beyond the view of the naked eye.
THE LIGHT SOURCE SHOULD STILL BE VERY VISIBLE THRU A TELESCOPE FOR A MUCH GREATER DISTANCE AND A MUCH LONGER SPAN OF TIME JUST BY PIVOTING THE FOCUS POINT.
The light source will have no earth curvature to hide behind.
Flat earthers would have observable and repeatable evidence.
This is true. Check this out....
Hey dumb dumb, using this model how do you account for eclipses??
And what about the different stages of the moon???
Yeah I'm still waiting on that for a better explanation on that one, but I've moved on to tectonic plates now.