Girl or boy?
The latter mistaken for the formerGirl or boy?
What's the other example? They tried to paint the Uvalde shooter as trans but that was wrong and probably a deliberate lie.There's a serious problem with lgbt wanting get back in the most vile ways for being mistreated and bullied.
It's happened too many times to not be correlated. Communication through discord or other outlets are hyping them up or giving them a place to vent and plan revenge against their community.
Nashville shooter is top of my mind as just one example.
What's the other example? They tried to paint the Uvalde shooter as trans but that was wrong and probably a deliberate lie.
I'm not really buying that LGBT individuals are behind more than a fraction of the mass shootings that occur in this country. It seems more like a distraction by the right wing since blaming video games, Hollywood, and rap isn't really hitting like it used to.
What's the other example? They tried to paint the Uvalde shooter as trans but that was wrong and probably a deliberate lie.
I'm not really buying that LGBT individuals are behind more than a fraction of the mass shootings that occur in this country. It seems more like a distraction by the right wing since blaming video games, Hollywood, and rap isn't really hitting like it used to.
Called itI know BGOL has standing orders to incinerate, maim, and generally Bronksi/killamayne anything tranny but don't ya'll find it a little bit odd how all-of-a-sudden every other white terrorist is "transgender"? That is some right wing agenda shit that they know is easy fodder many will glob onto to avoid having to address fundamentally destructive and socially toxic racist, sexist, bigoted systemic programming.
Comprehension failure on your part. "Expressing frustrations with the acceptance of trans people" means he was against the LGBT. From the Washington Post:See post #189.
The user described his own plans to target an elementary school, while posting anti-LGBTQ+ and antisemitic views.
this is a dangerous precedent. what if the student gets a knife instead and goes on a stabbing spree killing a bunch of students.I get what Ish is saying, and he's right they will use this as precedent to charge parents in the future. However; it will be used mainly for white/ suburban parents, because they've already been charging inner city parents for their involvement in their children's crimes. Usually, after gross negligence or accessories after the fact. I remember a story of a kid (young adult) wanting to kill his girlfriend. The girlfriend worked with his mother at Home Depot or one of those type spots, and the mother was pretty much running point for the shooting. Texting her son the girl's movements, locations, and amping him up to do the shooting.
This precedent will mainly affect parents that look the other way to their children's criminal activities. Your "Mama Duck"s & the like. This can be crucial to parents that raise their kids to be gang bangers. This won't apply to the parents that are ignorant to their children's actions or ways. The mom working 2 or 3 jobs trying to keep afloat while their children are opp shopping won't be charged. However; if she's dropping the location of high point opps; then she's going to jail. Which I'm totally fine with.
I'll be interested to see how this plays out with the white kid that stole their parent's prescribed oxy after an operation and sells it to another kid & they overdose.
Pretty dumb slippery slope. There are no laws restricting knives based on age or criminal record. A felon can legally buy a kitchen knife at Wal-Mart. A parent has no responsibility to secure knives from a minor.this is a dangerous precedent. what if the student gets a knife instead and goes on a stabbing spree killing a bunch of students.
Will the parents be charged then for not securing the knives in the utensil drawer?