i do fine art, traditional art, digital art.
all of it is based on my skill set.
ive done A LOT of midjourney art.
none of it is based on my skill set. its based on regurgitated images taken from actual artists' work.
that's the difference.
Sure and I do now and always have completely respected your artistic skill and as I said, I appreciate the dialogue.
One nitpick to your message. The results you received to your prompts on Midjourney were based on regurgitated images, true, many of which are copyrighted. No argument from me there. It is what it is.
However, how much came from actual artists' work is debatable, since Stable Diffusion analyzes information from images uploaded to the web, period- not just art.
The degree of and source of regurgitation is a bit more complicated as well and typically not easy, if possible at all to quantify.
You know better than I do what you did on Midjourney and how you went about doing it and I won't argue with how much skill you feel you didn't apply to what you produced with it.
You and I might have differing views on what qualifies as "creating art."
If all of the images referenced in Stable Diffusion were public domain, then would the results automatically be "art"?
I would say no, not necessarily. Oxford Dictionary gives a definition of art that I generally agree with:
"the expression or application of human creative skill and imagination, typically in a visual form such as painting or sculpture, producing works to be appreciated primarily for their beauty or emotional power."
My read on that is that the key words are "human creative skill", "imagination" "beauty" and "emotional power". To my eyes and ears, that means that the work is created by one who knows how to effectively tell a story that moves people and is able to do so in such a way that it is reflective of one's personal style based upon their skill and their unique experiential input. In the art of emceeing, what sets Black Thought apart is his ability to effectively communicate with the language that is accessible to all, yet use unique and new metaphor, simile and symbolism while rhyming combined with rhythmic dexterity, storytelling and delivery.
Collage artists and also Hip-hop producers also work with recycled fragments of finished art and expression and are capable of producing brilliance when they are able to flip the data in unique ways ala J. Dilla or RZA, particularly in combination with good emcees.
So it is just to say that an established fine artist can similarly use a program like Midjourney as a tool to articulate stories the way that artist visualizes it down to the fine details. Me personally, it isn't a situation of simply entering a prompt and ooing and aahing over instant photorealism. When I write a song, I hear it in my head with completeness. It is just a matter of getting on the keyboard, guitar, bass, percussion, microphone, sampler etc to flesh it out. My present Midjourney creative experience looks to develop my own formulas that others aren't using in order to articulate visually what I have to say and say it visually in a way that is not a carbon copy of anyone else. To that end, my process involves the collection of resources, note taking and experimentation 90% before it comes to the 10% that is creation. It's like a DAW in musicmaking (collecting sounds and gaining control over the capabilities of the software) or an expanded Photoshop in my eyes with the addition of on-demand (extra-legal) stock materials. The randomness of the AI can be frustrating to me, personally. So then the ongoing challenge is to gain some degree of control over it with consistency.