It's an open forum. If you had an answer you would have responded.He didn't direct any question to me. What are you talking about??
It's an open forum. If you had an answer you would have responded.He didn't direct any question to me. What are you talking about??
This is not a pure capitalist country.Then those countries aren't pure socialist like we aren't capitalism when we bail out major corporations and give them hand outs
What do I need to answer? Let get to the bottomline.It's an open forum. If you had an answer you would have responded.
I agree thus the rest of my statement talking about the handouts we give to big business smhThis is not a pure capitalist country.
You don't have to you just can'tWhat do I need to answer? Let get to the bottomline.
You belive a black socialist party is what's needed. Then get to it.
You said and I quote:1. I didn't say high tide raises anything. That expression doesn't even apply here. I said those policies are beneficial to us directly. Not in a high tide kind of way. In a direct kind of way. If it doesn't prove me wrong.
Naw, they should absolutely accept the hush money. But, they should also understand that this is minuscule in the grand scheme of things. We know our people, they will be buying tvs, jordans, handbags, down payments on cars, trips, etc. All of which will "stimulate the economy but not help them improve their overall financial situation.2. Answer my question. Should the farmers and parents and the unemployed black peeps refuse the benefits since it isnt specifically for black peeps?
The reality is, the lives of black folk has not seen overall improvement for decades. Employment, incarceration, education, wealth, family structure, home ownership, and many other categories have seen a decrease regarding black folk.3. I didnt say to not demand anything for your vote. I said where does your not voting solution get you? Do you get to live an imaginary life where your community wont be affected by whoever OTHERS choose to govern?
You don't have to you just can't
the bold is the most cynical FUCKED UP stereotyped response I've ever seen from a black person about black peopleYou said and I quote:
......... policy that positively affects black folk doesnt "count" if that policy doesnt only help black folk? .........
Good policy is good policy. A positive impact is a positive impact.
This is the absolute definition of a tide raises all boats. Policy that isn't specific for any one group, but is supposed to help all. The assistance is not direct as you incorrectly stated. It's indirect because it does not directly benefit black folk.
Naw, they should absolutely accept the hush money. But, they should also understand that this is minuscule in the grand scheme of things. We know our people, they will be buying tvs, jordans, handbags, down payments on cars, trips, etc. All if which will "stimulate the economy but not help them improve their overall financial situation.
The reality is, the lives of black folk has not seen overall improvement for decades. Employment, incarceration, education, wealth, family structure, home ownership, and many other categories have seen a decrease regarding black folk.
My brother, I sincerely believe that we want the same thing. To see black folk doing better. Unfortunately, I believe that until we properly leverage our power while doing for self to improve our own situation, we will continue to be pawns for politicians and the wealthy.
I just can't and you're right about everything. So when are you going to start that black socialist party?You don't have to you just can't
You are conflating two issue to illicit a response. Let's not pretend that the $1400 isn't going to be used for everything other than some type of asset creation.the bold is the most cynical FUCKED UP stereotyped response I've ever seen from a black person about black people
You literally said black farmers..black BUSINESS OWNERS would essentially fuck away their "hush money" on trivial shit rather than use it to oh I dunno..SAVE AND EXPAND ON THEIR ACTUAL BUSINESSES! As if black people don't know how to run a farming business. Thats the response I would expect on a message board like stormfront or a fox news comment section..you know racist ASSHOLES..
And then you wonder why people call you all agents and cacs and shit...![]()
You said and I quote:
......... policy that positively affects black folk doesnt "count" if that policy doesnt only help black folk? .........
Good policy is good policy. A positive impact is a positive impact.
This is the absolute definition of a tide raises all boats. Policy that isn't specific for any one group, but is supposed to help all. The assistance is not direct as you incorrectly stated. It's indirect because it does not directly benefit black folk.
Naw, they should absolutely accept the hush money. But, they should also understand that this is minuscule in the grand scheme of things. We know our people, they will be buying tvs, jordans, handbags, down payments on cars, trips, etc. All if which will "stimulate the economy but not help them improve their overall financial situation.
The reality is, the lives of black folk has not seen overall improvement for decades. Employment, incarceration, education, wealth, family structure, home ownership, and many other categories have seen a decrease regarding black folk.
My brother, I sincerely believe that we want the same thing. To see black folk doing better. Unfortunately, I believe that until we properly leverage our power while doing for self to improve our own situation, we will continue to be pawns for politicians and the wealthy.
maybe not exactly the same but you clearly don't see any redeeming value in either party.
we've done this dance before so I'm pasting past responses at this point![]()
![]()
![]()
and this is where YOU misinterpret things. NO ONE has said the democratic party or candidates are beyond criticism...show where I said that?
My worldview is NOT constructed as if the Democrats are my favorite sports team... I'm just pointing out that the choices are in the present political landscape are limited and we have to deal with the choices in front of us.
playing voting GAMES with that choice doesn't work as we've seen the last 4 years.
I never inferred anything about the black vote and hillarys loss. (another misconstrue by you) Glaude's strategy was based on a scenario he read about in book and in that ALL THE PEOPLE IN THE COUNTRY rejected the choices for president. In the vids you and I posted about him he's talking to EVERYONE not just black people about doing this. But therein lies the FATAL FLAW. In order for blank out to work in AMERICAN POLITICS, everyone has to be disgusted by the choices...otherwise, IT WON'T WORK PERIOD! And what did we discover?? Not only do rightwing people don't give a shit about social justice they LIKE voting for out and out ASSHOLES!! Make no mistake trump is the absolute WORST example of a political candidate this side of Shemp from the 3 Stooges and that fucker garnered the SECOND MOST VOTES IN US HISTORY!! That means ALL BETS ARE OFF!! ANYONE CAN WIN THIS THING!! Ergo, BLANKOUT CAN NEVER WORK!!
You and the down ballot-blank out crew can continue to do it but its a hopeless purely symbolic gesture that at this point only makes YOU feel superior in that "I didn't vote for XXX and you all are stupid for doing so" which is at most immature and certainly doesn't help ANYTHING and is detrimental to your OWN cause..ask Eddie G![]()
![]()
Given a real-world choice in real time, Eddie Glaude stayed on the democratic "plantation"....thats all that happened..and you know it![]()
Yes, symbolism.
You are aware that its Glaude himself who's calling it that right?
Are you sure you read the article? Glaude mentions Arizona himself and Georgia has always been known as a red state. So how do they not apply?
Its his strategy and he's telling you its only for symbolic purposes to send a message.
So Im sorry but I need a better solution then symbols while others are deciding who gets govern over me.
Why are you satisfied with symbols?
regardless the 1400 is for everyone not just black and I'll go out and say that most black struggling black people will use the money for more meaninful things like rent or mortgage or utilities etc. Youre still playing into a horrible stereotype.You are conflating two issue to illicit a response. Let's not pretend that the $1400 isn't going to be used for everything other than some type of asset creation.
Regarding the black farmers, if you read the language of the bill, it's states it's for farmers of color and those farmers who qualify as disadvantaged. The media has created a narrative for black farmers, because unfortunately, almost all black farmers qualify.
Of the 3.4 million farmers in the United States today, only 45,000 are Black, according to the USDA.
I'm glad these brothers and sisters will get assistance, Trump paid the white farmers more than they would have made selling crops. However, this money does not address the root of the problems. Why are black farmers doing worse? Why is the number dwindling annually? Why can they get contracts? Among other things.
Y'all niggas be ready to kill each other over politics. All that Black unity shit goes out da door when da Red & Blue comes into play.![]()
You are conflating two issue to illicit a response. Let's not pretend that the $1400 isn't going to be used for everything other than some type of asset creation.
Regarding the black farmers, if you read the language of the bill, it's states it's for farmers of color and those farmers who qualify as disadvantaged. The media has created a narrative for black farmers, because unfortunately, almost all black farmers qualify.
Of the 3.4 million farmers in the United States today, only 45,000 are Black, according to the USDA.
I'm glad these brothers and sisters will get assistance, Trump paid the white farmers more than they would have made selling crops. However, this money does not address the root of the problems. Why are black farmers doing worse? Why is the number dwindling annually? Why can they get contracts? Among other things.
to what point...any issues with any political party is best resolved by pressuring the politicians directly and voting...complaining to YOU on a message board isn't social or political activism...its just bitching and moaning.We've never had a discussion about which Dem and GOP policy positions I agree with or disagree with. And you have yet to quote where I've said "all parties are the same" yet you continue to hit me with that accusation.
Show me where you've been critical of any Democratic policy positions, politicians, or manuevers.
Geechie, do you read to learn or read to respond? The article he wrote expressly says that the strategy is geared towards BLACK voters!
We see one way to loosen the hold Democrats have on the black electorate: for African Americans to become strategic voters. We call it the Blank-Out Campaign.
![]()
The Black Vote: History Demands Strategy
The Blank-Out Campaign means not voting for Hillary Clinton—or Donald Trumptime.com
Not to mention that just because they pass a bill doesn't mean the black farmers will benefit. The USDA has a history of not following thruGeechie thinks putting a knife deep into a man's chest and then pulling it out by a centimeter is "progress" and we should bebecause of it.
This fuckery went down under Obama's administration. (.....crickets......)
How USDA distorted data to conceal decades of discrimination against Black farmers.....Under Vilsack, USDA employees foreclosed on Black farmers with outstanding discrimination complaints, many of which were never resolved. At the same time, USDA staff threw out new complaints and misrepresented their frequency, while continuing to discriminate against farmers. The department sent a lower share of loan dollars to Black farmers than it had under President Bush, then used census data in misleading ways to burnish its record on civil rights. And although numerous media outlets portrayed the Pigford settlement payments as lavish handouts—a narrative that originated with right-wing publisher Andrew Breitbart—USDA actually failed to adequately compensate Black farmers, and many of them lost their farms......![]()
How USDA distorted data to conceal decades of discrimination against Black farmers
The agency promoted a narrative that falsely inflated its record on civil rights—and ultimately cost black farmers land, money, and agency.thecounter.org
You like hillary?to what point...any issues with any political party is best resolved by pressuring the politicians directly and voting...complaining to YOU on a message board isn't social or political activism...its just bitching and moaning.
now youre quoting a different guy now..first it was eddie glaude and now its FREDRICK C. HARRIS...
but at the end of the day it doesn't matter. in 2016 blacks voted for hilary at 80+percent and she STILL lost electorally. you know who did the blank out on hillary??? WHITE WOMEN. White women didn't turn out for hillary. Sooo how did that work out for us??
The strategy doesn't build in or account for allies and is dependant upon the black vote inflicting pain on the party by losses enough to make the democratic party stop and say we need to start giving black people want they want exclusively. And that is very likely NOT going to be the response the party or any political organization is going to have.
between trump and hillary I would have rather had hillary I think recent history bears it out...it has nothing to do with like.You like hillary?
and thats where watchdogs and organized movements come in...thats political activism...cynical complaining before the ink is dry on the deal isn't.Not to mention that just because they pass a bill doesn't mean the black farmers will benefit. The USDA has a history of not following thru
to what point...any issues with any political party is best resolved by pressuring the politicians directly and voting...complaining to YOU on a message board isn't social or political activism...its just bitching and moaning.
now youre quoting a different guy now..first it was eddie glaude and now its FREDRICK C. HARRIS...
but at the end of the day it doesn't matter. in 2016 blacks voted for hilary at 80+percent and she STILL lost electorally. you know who did the blank out on hillary??? WHITE WOMEN. White women didn't turn out for hillary. Sooo how did that work out for us??
The strategy doesn't build in or account for allies and is dependant upon the black vote inflicting pain on the party by losses enough to make the democratic party stop and say we need to start giving black people want they want exclusively. And that is very likely NOT going to be the response the party or any political organization is going to have.
and thats where watchdogs and organized movements come in...thats political activism...cynical complaining before the ink is dry on the deal isn't.
I'm not playing into a stereotype. I'm just honest about our people. A lot of us are not fiscally responsible. A quick look at twitter, IG, tick tock, etc. People talking crazy about what they plan to spend the money on.regardless the 1400 is for everyone not just black and I'll go out and say that most black struggling black people will use the money for more meaninful things like rent or mortgage or utilities etc. Youre still playing into a horrible stereotype.
You were earlier trying to blame Glaude and Black people blanking out for Hillary's loss. Now you're saying white women. For the record, white women didn't "blank out" on Hillary. The majority of white women voted for Trump. How did that work out for us? You tell me. I've already told you to pull the stats. Black wealth collapsed, Black men were murdered by the police, protests erupted throughout the country, Black Lives Matter got started.................hold up, all that happened under Obama, right?
was I talking to you or about ADOS in that statement???This was said in the article you didn't read: "The electoral strategy we are calling for will have to be executed alongside grassroots movements." ADOS has repeatedly called for the same thing and has chapters throughout the country.
You push back against both.![]()
dude a LOT of PEOPLE aren't fiscally responsible... on the one hand youre essentially saying that the reason the black communuty is fucked up is because of real systemic racism that has hamstrung the community since the beginning.. which is TRUE..then you say oh yeah but black people are not fiscally responsible anyway based some assholes you saw on social media (again an answer you would get on stormfront)I'm not playing into a stereotype. I'm just honest about our people. A lot of us are not fiscally responsible. A quick look at twitter, IG, tick tock, etc. People talking crazy about what they plan to spend the money on.
Hell, you see how people on this board are planning to spend the money. Not one mention of bills, food, rent, etc.
Two things can be true at the same time.dude a LOT of PEOPLE aren't fiscally responsible... on the one hand youre essentially saying that the reason the black communuty is fucked up is because of real systemic racism that has hamstrung the community since the beginning.. which is TRUE..then you say oh yeah but black people are not fiscally responsible anyway based some assholes you saw on social media (again an answer you would get on stormfront)
Stop worrying about whats in other peoples pockets..thats what cacs do.
Spectrum my guythe fuck happened to this thread? ....it used to be essential viewing now it's a bunch of doo doo
brotha @Spectrum are you ready to move this?
I was thinking the same thing as soon as the Democrats past that relief bill all types of the stupid people started coming out of the woods....One positive thing about this is I got a chance to add more people to my ignore list.the fuck happened to this thread? ....it used to be essential viewing now it's a bunch of doo doo
brotha @Spectrum are you ready to move this?