A proposal to rethink NBA playoff seeding
What happens if
Victor Wembanyama,
Chris Paul,
Harrison Barnes and the rest of the
Spurs’ young guys are a .500 or better team this season? Assuming relative health in the Western Conference, we’re looking at 13 teams competing for 10 spots. That’s wild! We have the 10 teams from last season plus a
Houston team that is looking to take a massive step forward,
Memphis is healthy and a problem for anyone, and maybe this Spurs team.
When you look over at the East, there are eight teams you know will belong. It’s the exact eight teams we saw in the postseason
last year.
Detroit,
Washington,
Charlotte,
Brooklyn and
Toronto will still be bad.
Chicago is heading toward youth rather than substance at the moment. And we’re still waiting for
Atlanta to take things more seriously. But alas, someone will have to fill out last two Play-In spots in the East.
As I watch the
WNBA playoffs, which don’t follow conference seedings (the league only has 12 teams currently),
it makes me a little wistful for the idea of the NBA following something similar. As the league has revamped things with the NBA Cup and the Play-In Tournament, maybe this is something for Adam Silver and company to explore again.
The East is rarely as good as the West when it comes to depth of great teams, and the imbalance is becoming more pronounced this season.
Here is my half-baked idea of how to fix the playoff format:
- If you finish in the top six of your conference, you’re in.
- The eight teams with the best records outside of those top six in each conference would be relegated to Play-In Tournament status to participate in a more robust Play-In format.
- The team with the best record of the eight would face the one with worst record, and so forth, in a single-elimination format.
So using last season as an example, your Play-In squads and brackets would be:
- First round of (1) New Orleans against (8) Chicago, (2) Philly against (7) Houston, (3) Lakers against (6) Sacramento and (4) Miami against (5) Golden State. Let’s just say the higher seed won each game.
- New Orleans then plays Miami. Philadelphia plays Los Angeles.
- Winners get the No. 7 seed. Better regular-season record gets to stay in their conference with tiebreakers in case of the same record. Losers get the No. 8 seed with better record staying in their conference.
Ultimately, is this the best idea for how this thing should play out? Maybe not!
Let me predict some gripes:
- It could be spun as an overreaction to a strong West year. I’d argue it’s closer to this imbalance more often than not, though.
- You could argue this extends the Play-In Tournament longer than it needs to be. Maybe we just put the dang thing in Vegas or at a neutral site so we can make it quicker?
- You could argue it ruins the East-West format the league loves. Only a little! Maybe not at all? We’ll see.
This won’t happen. But we can dream, can’t we?