So when’s the housing bubble bursting?

Moving Target

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
We Found a Tiny Home on Amazon That’s Fully Customizable and Includes a Cool Rooftop Deck Starting at $16.5K

And it comes pre-wired with electricity and plumbing

By Toni Sutton
August 18, 2024


peo-week-3-amazon-tk---tiny-home-tout-d5540d0676c04dbd868f74ddf79e5cda.jpg


prefab-hiking-house-20ft-container-home-684a9da4bbb34d389551159985bfe63a.jpg




I LOVE THIS FOR 17K. i got the perfect size lot for this ready made rental property.
 

Coldchi

Rising Star
BGOL Investor

 

Helico-pterFunk

Rising Star
BGOL Legend






 

DC_Dude

Rising Star
BGOL Investor

Inventory of New Completed Houses Surges to Highest since 2009, Triple from 2 Years Ago, Exactly What’s Needed to Bring Down Prices across the Housing Market​

by Wolf Richter • Aug 23, 2024 • 24 Comments

Sales of new houses jumped, fueled by lower prices, big incentives, and mortgage-rate buydowns. Homebuilders are taking share from homeowners.

By Wolf Richter for WOLF STREET.​

Inventory of new completed houses jumped to 99,000 houses in July, the highest since 2009, and about triple the inventory during the price-spike era of March 2021 through June 2022, according to Census Bureau data today.
Sales of completed houses jumped by 27% year-over-year to 28,000 houses. At this brisk rate of sales, the unsold inventory of completed houses translates into a healthy 3.5 months of supply.
These speculative houses are essentially move-in ready, they have to be sold quickly, builders have tied up lots of capital in them, and that inventory is encouraging builders to throw more incentives and mortgage-rate buydowns into the mix. This buildup of spec houses is exactly what the entire housing market needs the most to tamp down on prices.
US-new-house-sales-2024-08-22-inventory-completed_.png


Inventories of houses in all stages of construction – from not yet started to completed – remained at about 466,000 houses for the third month in a row, along with August-October 2022 the highest since 2008. Supply, given the jump in sales in July, fell to 7.3 months.
US-new-house-sales-2024-08-22-inventory-total.png

Homebuilders sold about 64,000 houses in July, not seasonally adjusted, up by 6.7% year-over-year and by 12% from July 2019, according to Census Bureau data today.
They’re the pros in the housing market, and they’re taking advantage of homeowners’ refusal to adjust their price expectations to reality, and so sales of new single-family houses have held up well, even as sales of existing houses have plunged to the lowest levels since the depth of the Housing Bust (in July -27% from the same period in 2018 and 2019).
US-new-house-sales-2024-08-22-sales.png

The seasonally adjusted annual rate of new house sales jumped by 10.6% in July from June, and by 5.5% year-over-year, to a rate of 739,000 sales, the highest since May 2023.
The big publicly traded homebuilders have figured out how to deal with this market. Unlike homeowners sitting on vacant houses, they cannot outwait this market (though a small builder might try that). Big builders have to build and sell houses to keep their revenues flowing, and they’re doing it.
They’re selling at a good clip, and they’re building at an even better clip, with unsold completed houses on the market now piling up, which is exactly what this market needs, though it’s a risky calculation for homebuilders.
Homebuyers who are frustrated with trying to buy an existing house, can go out and make a deal for a move-in ready new house, at a lower-than-market mortgage rate that the homebuilder bought down, and come out with lower payments.



Homebuilders’ sales take an ever-larger share from homeowners.

Sales of new houses as a percentage of existing house sales in July jumped to 20.7%, the highest since 2005 (except for the lockdown spike in June 2020), as some buyers have shifted from existing houses to new houses.
This aggressiveness by homebuilders will help tamp down prices as it adds supply to the overall housing market, even as demand for existing houses has plunged.
US-new-house-sales-2024-08-22-sales-percent-of-existing.png

Prices of new houses have dropped and are competitive with existing house prices.

Prices of new single-family houses sold at all stages of construction have been wobbling lower since the peak in late 2022, as builders are offering houses at lower price points – smaller, less fancy houses, and less fancy appliances and finishes – and they’re throwing in big incentives, including mortgage-rate buydowns, which are costly for builders. For example, Lennar disclosed that mortgage-rate buydowns cost $47,100 per house on average.
But the prices here a contract prices, as written into sales contracts, and the costs of mortgage-rate buydowns are not included here.
The median price of new houses (based on contract prices) is subject to large monthly up-and-down squiggles that are often heavily revised, so we focus on the three-month moving average of the median price, which includes all prior revisions, and irons out some of the monthly squiggles.
This three-month average of the median price of sales contracts ticked up to $418,300 in July, down by 1.6% from July 2023, and down by 3.8% from July 2022, and down by 5.4% from the peak in October 2022:
US-new-house-sales-2024-08-22-median-price.png

By comparison, the three-month-average median price of new houses (red in the chart below) is roughly $10,000 lower than the median price of existing single-family houses. For seasonal reasons, the median price of existing houses will drop for the rest of the year (blue):
US-new-house-sales-2024-08-23-median-price-v-existing.png
 

doe moe

Rising Star
Platinum Member

California Moves Toward Zero-Down-Payment Mortgages for Illegal Immigrants​




A California bill that would aid undocumented migrants on the path to home ownership has advanced in the state's legislature.

Democrats on the California Senate Appropriations Committee last week unanimously approved AB 1840, a bill that would amend the California Dream for All Shared Appreciation Loan program by preventing it from denying prospective homeowners based on their immigration status.

The program was launched in 2023 and gives first-time homebuyers in the Golden State a loan of up to 20 percent of the home's purchase price to be used as a down payment.
 

doe moe

Rising Star
Platinum Member

First-time homebuyers in Oregon get $30K grant — but American citizens aren’t eligible​



First-time homebuyers in Oregon are being encouraged to apply for a taxpayer-funded $30,000 grant for down payment assistance – but only non-U.S. citizens need apply.

Latino-led housing support group Hacienda Community Development Corporation in Portland is advertising the perk through its Camino a Casa program, which stipulates that it is “only for people who are not American citizens.”
 

DC_Dude

Rising Star
BGOL Investor

California Moves Toward Zero-Down-Payment Mortgages for Illegal Immigrants​




A California bill that would aid undocumented migrants on the path to home ownership has advanced in the state's legislature.


Democrats on the California Senate Appropriations Committee last week unanimously approved AB 1840, a bill that would amend the California Dream for All Shared Appreciation Loan program by preventing it from denying prospective homeowners based on their immigration status.

The program was launched in 2023 and gives first-time homebuyers in the Golden State a loan of up to 20 percent of the home's purchase price to be used as a down payment.

I believe this program is for any California resident. Also, the individual must have a SSN or INTN. @Dr. Truth might know more. The bank would still have to finance the other 80% and no bank is giving anyone money if they don't have prove of a legit job....







FACT CHECK: The information provided in the statement contains a mixture of facts and highly misleading implications. Here’s a detailed fact-check and analysis:

Key Points:

1.Assembly Bill 1840 (AB 1840) Overview:
•Fact: AB 1840 is a real bill in the California legislature that seeks to expand the eligibility criteria for the “California Dream for All Program.” The bill aims to ensure that the program does not exclude individuals based on their immigration status.

•Clarification: The bill does not specifically or exclusively target “illegal immigrants,” but rather aims to include all residents regardless of their immigration status.

2.“Zero Down Payments and 0% Interest Loans” Claim:
•Misleading: The statement suggests that the program offers zero down payments and 0% interest loans universally, which is not accurate.

The “California Dream for All Program” is designed as a shared appreciation loan program. The state contributes to the down payment in exchange for a share of the home’s appreciation value when it is eventually sold. It is not a traditional loan with 0% interest.

•Explanation: The program is designed to help first-time homebuyers by offering them down payment assistance. In return, the state takes a stake in the future appreciation of the home’s value, which is how the program is funded and sustained.

3.“Significant Cost Pressures”:
•Fact: Expanding the program to include all residents, regardless of immigration status, could potentially create increased demand and cost pressures. However, this statement needs context.

•Clarification: The term “significant cost pressures” might be referenced from discussions or analyses within the legislature regarding the potential impact on the state’s budget.

However, any cost increase would need to be assessed within the broader context of the state’s housing policies, budget, and overall goals of inclusivity and support for first-time homebuyers.

4.“Illegal Immigrants” Terminology:
•Misleading: The use of the term “illegal immigrants” is politically charged and can be misleading in this context. The bill is focused on inclusivity for all residents, and framing it as specifically targeting “illegal immigrants” distorts the intent of the legislation.

•Clarification: The term “undocumented immigrants” is more accurate and reflects the legal and policy language. The intent of the bill is to ensure that immigration status does not disqualify individuals from participating in state-supported programs, aligning with broader goals of equity.

5.Approval Status:
•Fact: As of the latest updates, AB 1840 has indeed passed through certain legislative stages, including the Assembly and the Senate Appropriations Committee, and it is headed for a floor vote in the State Senate.

•Clarification: The legislative process involves multiple steps, and the bill’s passage through committees is part of this process. It does not mean the bill is already law or has final approval.

Conclusion:

The statement you provided mixes factual information with misleading claims and politically charged language.

While it is true that AB 1840 is a real bill aimed at expanding the “California Dream for All Program” to include all residents regardless of immigration status, the characterisation of the program as offering “zero down payments and 0% interest loans” is inaccurate and oversimplified.

Additionally, the framing of the bill as specifically benefiting “illegal immigrants” totally distorts the broader policy goal of inclusivity.

This type of framing is produced deliberately to contribute to disinformation, misunderstandings and polarisation, so it is important to approach such statements with careful scrutiny and context.
 

DC_Dude

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
@doe moe - you the homie and purchased a home before. Ain't no way in hell a bank, which is a for profit entity, would be willing to give someone that doesn't have a legit job any kind of money.....They put you through hoops and obstacles if you have a 700 credit score...

For eligiblity purposes, they still need a SSN or an ITIN

The bill’s author, Fresno Democrat Joaquin Arambula, countered that the bill specifies applicants must meet requirements set by the Federal National Mortgage Association, or Fannie Mae, including having a taxpayer identification number or social security number to apply for a loan, which means they’re taxpayers.
“It isn’t given out willy nilly to just anybody,” Democratic Assemblymember Eloise Gómez Reyes said at the June hearing.
The loan program, called California Dream for All, provides 20 percent in down payment assistance, up to $150,000. It is a shared appreciation loan in which the only interest the homebuyer pays would be 15 or 20 percent of the home’s increase in value upon selling the property, depending on their income level. The program has received state funding but is also run by the California Housing Finance Agency, which generates revenue through mortgage loans and not from taxpayers.
 

Helico-pterFunk

Rising Star
BGOL Legend







 
Last edited:

Helico-pterFunk

Rising Star
BGOL Legend




 

Helico-pterFunk

Rising Star
BGOL Legend









87081829-0-image-a-80_1721645892252.jpg
 

Dr. Truth

QUACK!
BGOL Investor









87081829-0-image-a-80_1721645892252.jpg
Not like us house?
 

Helico-pterFunk

Rising Star
BGOL Legend
Brandon Miller, a prominent real estate developer, left behind nearly $34 million in debt and had just $8,000 in his bank account when he decided to take his own life, according to legal documents.

A significant portion of this debt was tied to his Hamptons estate at 25 Cobb Isle Road, which is now on the market for $15.5 million.

His widow, Candice Miller, has filed a bond petition detailing four outstanding loans on the property, including a $2 million mortgage from Titan Capital, which has recently sued her over missed payments.

Beyond the property debt, Miller had a substantial unsecured loan of $11.3 million from BMO Bank. Additionally, he owed over $6 million to Donald Jaffe, a lender who had previously funded Miller and his father on various projects. Jaffe is still pursuing legal action to recover the unpaid balance.

Other creditors include American Express and Funding Club, a Brooklyn-based cash advance lender, to whom Miller owed over $300,000 and $266,000, respectively.
 
Top