Yep, this tells me everything I need to know. I know the people are Macon Georgia probably looking at Trump like …..They done got Mush Mouth out the junkyard. Ain’t this some shit?
#NeverForget
UPDATE: Donald Trump Takes Office as the 47th US President
- Thread starter DC_Dude
- Start date
She seriously need to go on somewhere..local news interviewed her earlier asking will she accept the results if Ruben Gallego wins and she was like"Absolutely not."
Arizona’s Election Tipping Point
Kari Lake has made denialism and bombast her brand.www.theatlantic.com
|
Additional signs include:
2020 General Election: The GOP lost the House, Senate, and WH
2022 Midterms Election: The predicted "GOP Tsunami" turned out to be a trickle with only a slim GOP majority in the U.S. House of Representatives and lost of more U.S. Senate seats. Most of the Trump-backed candidates lost elections. Overall, a net loss.
2024 General Election: The Early vote returns, so far, are not looking good for the GOP, after the Trump syndicate took over the RNC, including campaign finances, where Court case fees TRUMPED funding for GOP candidates. We'll see how the Court Cases OVER GOP Candidates strategy works out. Stay tuned.
TOP COON OF AMERICA CANDIDATES
(See Last Slide)
(See Slide 6)
(See Last Slide)
(See Slide 6)
Last edited:
Trump Plummets in Election Betting Odds After Shock Poll Shows Him Losing Iowa to Harris
Aggregator Election Betting Odds showed Kamala Harris up nearly ten points in the week since Trump’s campaign held a deranged, racist rally at MSG.
This race wasn’t never close, but he really shot himself in the foot with that Madison Square Garden rally.
Trump Plummets in Election Betting Odds After Shock Poll Shows Him Losing Iowa to Harris
Aggregator Election Betting Odds showed Kamala Harris up nearly ten points in the week since Trump’s campaign held a deranged, racist rally at MSG.
the Liz Cheney threats also...
QUE BELEZA!
At about the 30 second mark it starts.
Neo-Nazi Influencer Nick Fuentes Now Says ‘Trumpism Is a Cult’
The white nationalist also claimed Trump’s supporters had an “endless tolerance for being humiliated”www.thedailybeast.com
Well his PAC just got hit with a class action lawsuit and the SEC would like to speak to him.....His lil empire might be crumbling...
SEC Seeks Court Order Sanctioning Elon Musk for Testimony No-Show
Musk's attorney said reimbursing the SEC for duplicative travel would be a fair remedy, but an SEC lawyer said a deterrent was needed.October 28, 2024 at 12:42 PM
4 minute read
Administrative Law
By Ellen Bardash
The SEC has asked a San Francisco federal court to sanction Elon Musk for failing to show up to testify about his 2022 acquisition of Twitter as scheduled in September.
Both SEC attorney Robin Andrews and Musk's attorney, Alex Spiro of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, submitted statements to the court on Friday.
Spiro said that reimbursing the SEC for counsel's duplicative travel expenses is a fair resolution, but Andrews argued that adding a finding that Musk violated a court order to appear is a needed deterrent.
The proposed sanctions in question are linked to testimony scheduled for Sept. 10, a date rescheduled from a year earlier, when Musk also did not appear. On Sept. 9, three SEC attorneys flew to Los Angeles but were allegedly informed by email the morning of Sept. 10 that Musk had flown to Florida for a SpaceX rocket launch and would not be testifying that day.
The SEC claims Musk knew of the launch and should have informed counsel of his change of plans more than three hours before he was scheduled to testify.
"Only after the SEC sought court intervention (again) and stated its intent to seek sanctions did Musk finally appear," the SEC's statement read. "The court should make clear that disregard for court orders comes with real consequences."
Spiro's statement says the rescheduling was due to an emergency, as the rocket launch was dependent on changing weather conditions and wasn't guaranteed to go forward until shortly before the launch was scheduled.
Musk has stipulated to pay just under $3,000 for the SEC's September travel expenses, which Spiro wrote is enough to resolve the issue without court intervention. A finding that Musk violated a court order isn't warranted on top of the reimbursement, Spiro wrote, because the court order in question stated testimony could be rescheduled with written consent, a requirement that had been met.
During a brief hearing on Sept. 27, U.S. District Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley confirmed Musk's deposition was rescheduled for Oct. 3. The latest filing confirms Musk showed up to testify for roughly four hours at the SEC's Los Angeles office on that date.
"As a practical matter, the answer is straightforward: there is no sound reason to decide whether Mr. Musk violated the court's order given that he has now complied with that order and offered all of the compensation the SEC seeks," Spiro wrote.
"Only ordering reimbursement of travel costs would not serve as a real deterrent for many individuals considering violating a court order—much less someone of Musk's extraordinary means," Andrews wrote. "Reimbursement of the SEC's travel costs is inadequate because it does not fully address Musk's conduct and is inconsequential to him."
The SEC first turned to the court seeking enforcement of its investigative subpoena in October 2023. In its petition to the court, the SEC indicated a private investigation into whether Musk's 2022 acquisition of what was then Twitter violated federal securities laws had been going on since April 2022, when Musk first announced he was seeking to acquire the company. A deal was ultimately reached Oct. 27, 2022.
The commission claimed Musk had agreed in May 2023 to testify that September but said two days before the scheduled hearing that he would not be appearing, with part of his objection being to holding the hearing in San Francisco. Musk, according to the petition, refused the SEC's offer to have him instead testify in Fort Worth, Texas, in October or November 2023.
As of Oct. 28, Corley had not issued a ruling or scheduled a hearing on the sanctioning dispute.
SEC Seeks Court Order Sanctioning Elon Musk for Testimony No-Show
Musk's attorney said reimbursing the SEC for duplicative travel would be a fair remedy, but an SEC lawyer said a deterrent was needed.
October 28, 2024 at 12:42 PM
4 minute read
Administrative Law
Ellen Bardash
By Ellen Bardash
The SEC has asked a San Francisco federal court to sanction Elon Musk for failing to show up to testify about his 2022 acquisition of Twitter as scheduled in September.
Both SEC attorney Robin Andrews and Musk's attorney, Alex Spiro of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, submitted statements to the court on Friday.
Spiro said that reimbursing the SEC for counsel's duplicative travel expenses is a fair resolution, but Andrews argued that adding a finding that Musk violated a court order to appear is a needed deterrent.
The proposed sanctions in question are linked to testimony scheduled for Sept. 10, a date rescheduled from a year earlier, when Musk also did not appear. On Sept. 9, three SEC attorneys flew to Los Angeles but were allegedly informed by email the morning of Sept. 10 that Musk had flown to Florida for a SpaceX rocket launch and would not be testifying that day.
The SEC claims Musk knew of the launch and should have informed counsel of his change of plans more than three hours before he was scheduled to testify.
"Only after the SEC sought court intervention (again) and stated its intent to seek sanctions did Musk finally appear," the SEC's statement read. "The court should make clear that disregard for court orders comes with real consequences."
Spiro's statement says the rescheduling was due to an emergency, as the rocket launch was dependent on changing weather conditions and wasn't guaranteed to go forward until shortly before the launch was scheduled.
Musk has stipulated to pay just under $3,000 for the SEC's September travel expenses, which Spiro wrote is enough to resolve the issue without court intervention. A finding that Musk violated a court order isn't warranted on top of the reimbursement, Spiro wrote, because the court order in question stated testimony could be rescheduled with written consent, a requirement that had been met.
During a brief hearing on Sept. 27, U.S. District Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley confirmed Musk's deposition was rescheduled for Oct. 3. The latest filing confirms Musk showed up to testify for roughly four hours at the SEC's Los Angeles office on that date.
"As a practical matter, the answer is straightforward: there is no sound reason to decide whether Mr. Musk violated the court's order given that he has now complied with that order and offered all of the compensation the SEC seeks," Spiro wrote.
"Only ordering reimbursement of travel costs would not serve as a real deterrent for many individuals considering violating a court order—much less someone of Musk's extraordinary means," Andrews wrote. "Reimbursement of the SEC's travel costs is inadequate because it does not fully address Musk's conduct and is inconsequential to him."
The SEC first turned to the court seeking enforcement of its investigative subpoena in October 2023. In its petition to the court, the SEC indicated a private investigation into whether Musk's 2022 acquisition of what was then Twitter violated federal securities laws had been going on since April 2022, when Musk first announced he was seeking to acquire the company. A deal was ultimately reached Oct. 27, 2022.
The commission claimed Musk had agreed in May 2023 to testify that September but said two days before the scheduled hearing that he would not be appearing, with part of his objection being to holding the hearing in San Francisco. Musk, according to the petition, refused the SEC's offer to have him instead testify in Fort Worth, Texas, in October or November 2023.
As of Oct. 28, Corley had not issued a ruling or scheduled a hearing on the sanctioning dispute.
Yummy.
