Why do more white progressives say racism is a major problem than do black people?

xxxbishopxxx

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/16/us/politics/biden-obama-history.html

Obama and Biden’s Relationship Looks Rosy. It Wasn’t Always That Simple.


Image
00BidenObama1-articleLarge.jpg

In Joseph R. Biden Jr., Barack Obama found a running mate who would conjure the comforting past and lessen the sense of change. But it was a rocky road to his selection.CreditCreditDoug Mills/The New York Times


By Glenn Thrush

  • Aug. 16, 2019
WASHINGTON — Barack Obama was riding his call for generational change to the Democratic presidential nomination in the spring of 2008 when he began musing about potential running mates with aides traveling with him on the trail.

“I want somebody with gray in his hair,” Mr. Obama, then 46, told one of them. He was thinking about an “older guy,” he told another.

That older guy, people around the candidate would soon learn, was Joseph R. Biden Jr., 65, a has-been to pundits but to Mr. Obama a sweet-spot pick — a policy heavyweight with limited political horizons, assuming that would ensure loyalty and minimal drama. Mr. Obama was already phoning Mr. Biden two or three times a week to solicit advice, and to decide whether the Delaware senator’s many positive attributes outweighed his singular liability, a notoriously self-tangling tongue.

Over the next several months, Mr. Obama’s top advisers would present 30 alternatives, all of whom he respectfully considered. But his preference was clear from the start. When it came time to decide in August, Mr. Obama chose Mr. Biden over two younger finalists — Tim Kaine, the governor of Virginia, and Senator Evan Bayh of Indiana, peers in the mold of Bill Clinton’s choice of Al Gore in 1992.

most recent Democratic debate.

The Obama-Biden origin story has been often told, and often sentimentalized. But a re-examination at this crystallizing moment of the primary campaign, based on more than two dozen interviews with Obama and Biden aides and others with knowledge of the relationship, reveals a more complicated dynamic between the two men, and one that is still evolving.

how Joe Biden’s ’88 campaign fell apart.]

Mr. Biden drove his 2008 campaign from the lot directly into a pothole. On the eve of its rollout, in January 2007, he told a reporter for The New York Observer that Mr. Obama was “the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy.” Mr. Biden did not bother to tell any of his aides that the interview had gone catastrophically wrong.

Mr. Obama laughed it off. But it did little to improve his overall impression of Mr. Biden as condescending to him, forged when Mr. Obama was assigned to the Foreign Relations Committee shortly after being elected to the Senate in 2004. During their first private meeting, Mr. Biden suggested the two men have dinner, and offered to pick up the bill.

The freshman senator, who was earning millions from his memoirs, shot back that he could afford to pay, according to Mr. Biden’s retelling of the episode in his own autobiography.

Joe Biden has a long history of verbal flubs and gaffes. And he knows it.]

Mr. Biden was candid about his struggle to maintain verbal discipline, and he repeatedly interrupted himself to ask, “Am I making sense?” But the quantity of his advice was offset by its quality. Mr. Obama’s political magi were especially impressed with his insights into the Republican nominee, Senator John McCain.

The former Navy pilot valued unpredictability, Mr. Biden said, anticipating Mr. McCain’s selection of Sarah Palin as his running mate and Mr. McCain’s disastrous decision to suspend his campaign that fall to focus on the global financial crisis.

What most impressed Mr. Obama’s advisers, however, was Mr. Biden’s ease with his family; he was comfortable expressing affection to his wife and grown children in a way that most politicians, including Mr. Obama, were not.

The intensity of those bonds would become apparent after Mr. Obama picked Mr. Biden, and campaign researchers uncovered potential public relations problems stemming from Mr. Biden’s son Hunter, including complications from his lobbying work and indications of marital, legal and substance-abuse problems. (Those issues were examined in detail by The New Yorker earlier this year.)

When an Obama campaign official flagged the issue, Mr. Biden grew angry and warned, “Keep my family out of this.” The issue was dropped, according to a person involved in the vetting process.


Image

Senator Evan Bayh of Indiana and Mr. Obama in July 2008. Mr. Obama was warned that picking Mr. Bayh would guarantee his Senate seat would flip Republican.CreditMichael Conroy/Associated Press
The talk later in the day with Mr. Bayh, who was vacationing at the tony Greenbrier resort in West Virginia with his wife and young children, did not go well. The visitors caught him barefoot, emerging from a shower — and assumed it was an attempt to appear Kennedyesque. In reality, Mr. Bayh was less diffident than disoriented by being thrust into the national spotlight.

Mr. Bayh had another major liability. Mr. Reid, the Senate Democratic leader, had advised Mr. Obama that picking Mr. Bayh would guarantee his Senate seat would flip Republican — which could imperil the new president’s legislative agenda. Mr. Biden’s seat in Democratic Delaware was much safer.

The meeting with Mr. Kaine in Richmond was respectful, friendly and a bit bittersweet. (Eight years later, Mr. Kaine would be Mrs. Clinton’s running mate in the losing campaign against Mr. Trump.)

In early August, Mr. Obama arranged to have Mr. Biden quietly shuttled to his suite at the Graves 601 Hotel in Minneapolis, where he was campaigning. The conversation lasted well into the night.

Mr. Obama agreed that Mr. Biden would be the final person he spoke to before making a big decision, and the two men would have weekly lunches. Mr. Biden also made a loyalty pledge that would become the basis of their deeper personal bond. “You make a decision, and I will follow it to my death,” Mr. Biden said, according to Mr. Kaufman.

At some point, Mr. Biden also told Obama aides that “Barack would never have to worry” about him positioning himself for another presidential run. He was too old, he told them, and he viewed his new job as a capstone, not a catapult. But while both sides assumed that vow covered the duration of Mr. Obama’s presidency, what might happen after that was never explicitly stated.

Mr. Biden was the only one of the finalists to make such a promise. “That was helpful,” Mr. Plouffe said.

Before parting, Mr. Obama popped a surprise, intended to test Mr. Biden’s commitment to being a wingman: “Would you prefer being secretary of state to vice president?” he asked.

Mr. Biden chose the latter. Mr. Obama formally offered him the job after he flew back to Washington. Neither man has ever spoken publicly about exactly what was said, but one Biden aide who was watching the little red switchboard light for the senator’s private line said it stayed on too long for it to have simply been a perfunctory call of congratulations.


Image

In discussions about the 2020 campaign, Mr. Obama has expressed frustration to Mr. Biden that his closest advisers are too old and out of touch with the current political climate.CreditAl Drago/The New York Times
A Protective Partner
The next eight years are the stuff of buddy-movie lore — “a shotgun marriage that gradually turned into a love story,” in Mr. Axelrod’s telling.

Still, Mr. Biden’s simmering ambition was a source of unease for both men. Mr. Plouffe shut down an early move made by Mr. Biden as vice president to assemble a presidential team-in-waiting, blocking Mr. Biden’s attempts to court the party’s West Coast fund-raising elite and rejecting an attempt to hire Kevin Sheekey, a veteran Democratic operative.

In 2016, Mr. Obama quietly pressured Mr. Biden to sit out the race, partly because he believed Mrs. Clinton had a better chance of building on his agenda, and partly because he thought Mr. Biden was in no shape emotionally following the illness and death of his son Beau in May 2015.

By now, the line between heart and head, between the personal and political, so clear a decade ago, has blurred completely.

The two men spoke at least a half dozen times before Mr. Biden decided to run, and Mr. Obama took pains to cast his doubts about the campaign in personal terms.

“You don’t have to do this, Joe, you really don’t,” Mr. Obama told Mr. Biden earlier this year, according to a person familiar with the exchange.

Mr. Biden — who thinks he could have defeated Donald Trump four years ago — responded by telling Mr. Obama he could never forgive himself if he turned down a second shot at Mr. Trump.

Mr. Obama has said he will not make an endorsement in the primary, and has offered every candidate his counsel. But he has taken an active interest in the inner workings of his friend’s campaign, to an extent beyond anything offered to other candidates.

In his interactions with Mr. Biden — the pair had a quiet lunch in Washington last month — Mr. Obama has hammered away at the need for his campaign to expand his aging inner circle.

He has communicated his frustration that Mr. Biden’s closest advisers are too old and out of touch with the current political climate — urging him to include more younger aides, according to three Democrats with direct knowledge of the discussion.

In March, Mr. Obama took the unusual step of summoning Mr. Biden’s top campaign advisers, including the former White House communications director Anita Dunn and Mr. Biden’s longtime spokeswoman, Kate Bedingfield, to his Washington office for a briefing on the campaign’s digital and communications strategy with members of his own staff, including his senior adviser, Eric Schultz.

When they were done, Mr. Obama offered a pointed reminder, according to two people with knowledge of his comments:

Win or lose, they needed to make sure Mr. Biden did not “embarrass himself” or “damage his legacy” during the campaign.

Correction: Aug. 16, 2019
An earlier version of this article misspelled the last name of Ted Kaufman and incorrectly described Mark Warner’s role in government in 2008. Mr. Warner was running for Senate that year; he was not a senator.

Correction: Aug. 19, 2019
An earlier version of this article misstated John McCain’s role as a pilot in Vietnam. He flew bombing missions as an attack aircraft pilot, but he was not a “fighter pilot.”
 

Rembrandt Brown

Slider
Registered
It was not.

And you're welcome again lol


It's hilarious what your cape will flap for

But I guess "it is what it is"

Dude, you were flat-out fucking wrong. There's no source backing up your misinformed claim. The reason I posted the Google link is literally every source contradicts you.

It's okay to be wrong. Admit it when you are and thank the person who educates you. I do it all the time.

Nah white ppl believe in racism more than black ppl according to the op lol

"White progressives"

So you just want to be intentionally dishonest now? You're not that stupid.
 

Rembrandt Brown

Slider
Registered
Point One-I don't really understand where you are coming from. What do you consider as "good" left politics, when a lot of your posts seem to attack all current forms of left/liberal politics?

Can you point to two examples of me attacking "all current forms of left/liberal politics"?

I'm a socialist. My first reply to you links to and quotes several examples of me making a distinction between liberalism and leftism.

Point two- you stated you didn't want to add Trump to any of your post discussions because you are tired of talking about him.

No. I did not say I "didn't want to add Trump to any of [my] post discussions."

I said "I get bored with the conversation revolving around Trump" and posted a couple of recent examples where I do talk about Trump.

I hope this is an honest mistake because I don't want to take the time to dialogue with people who intentionally misrepresent my statements. I don't want to add Trump to every discussion or even most of them-- That's very different from what you claim I said.

Yet to have all these political conversations in some sort of vacuum makes no sense. How can you ignore the extreme right is the reason the extreme left has gotten louder in the last couple of years?

I don't ignore that. Once we move past your misunderstanding that I was condemning the extreme left-- I'm a part of it-- it should be clear why I'm not focused on blaming the extreme right for it's increased visibility.

As to the second part, the Alt-Right went ape shit when Obama got in and stayed in office. When Trump came around the rallied long and hard to help him get into office.

Yes, that's true. I never suggested otherwise.

Point Three-If Biden is such a viable candidate, why is Obama so concerned about him fucking up? The GQ article is a summary of the NY Time article, whose link is posted in my next post. BTW, this was written before the black parents need to sit down with their kids and listen to records comment he made at the last debate.

Biden has been fucking up all over the place, long before the last debate. I think it's clear why Obama was concerned. Bafflingly to me, it hasn't seemed to matter much so far but he's just now beginning to lose his frontrunner status. He's very obviously viable, as seen with his #1 status from the day he announced.
 

Dannyblueyes

Aka Illegal Danny
BGOL Investor
Bullshit ass article......, most Black people always see racism as a problem, maybe they asked the wrong question on their wack-ass survey. They don't understand that racism has been a part of our lives since birth so if you ask a Black person how American life can be improved, more than likely racism isn't going to be the first answer. Racism is too embedded into the fabric of our lives sometimes to even mention it. That's what the article/survey is not understanding.

The flip side is that we are living in a world where white bubbles are popping like never before. 20 or 30 years ago it was easy for a white person to go their entire life without having one meaningful relationship with a person of color. Few think twice about being racist or having white privilege when everybody you know and interact with looks just like you.

The world doesn't work that way anymore.

these changes caused some white people to vote for Trump and carry out terrorist attacks. They are trying to resist the future anyway they can.

Other white people have accepted or in some cases even embraced that change but doing so means that you have to re-examine white privilege. Once you start doing that it becomes very obvious how racist this world really is.

to put it another way, suppose I told you that there is one gram of cow shit in every McDonald's hamburger. It might convince you to eat more of them out of spite. More likely though, not only would you stop eating there, you would likely re-examine every single burger you ever had. Dwell on it long enough and eventually you would be convinced that contaminated burgers is a biggest problem humanity has ever faced. if someone took a poll that's exactly what you would tell them.

of course eventually you're still going to make that midnight run for a big Mac. cognitive dissidents and cultural conditioning will always bring you back to the same old shit.
 

Rembrandt Brown

Slider
Registered
Well, we tend to be more socially conservative because of our historical reliance on religion (among other things) but I wouldn’t say that we’re comfortable with the status quo. I would argue that many of us don’t rage against it the way that some might expect for two reasons:

1) We don’t think it will change; we’re nothing if not pragmatic
2) Many of us don’t necessarily want to end wealth disparity and discrimination as much as we just want greater access to economic opportunity

I think our collective thinking about discrimination is survival based and not necessarily rooted in apathy or selfishness.

Not that I necessarily think you’re incorrect but it’s helpful to wrap some context around the discussion.

That makes sense.

As Frederick Douglass said, "Power concedes nothing without a demand." I just wish black people in general demanded more and I'm trying to understand the root of the problem to figure out the solution.

I remember when black people largely supported Hillary Clinton until white people in Iowa showed Obama was viable. It seems like the exact same pattern is being replayed in 2019/2020.

(If the second point is true, I'm just not in line with the majority of black people. But I wonder how much of this is generational. Younger black Americans have very different voting preferences than older black people, we just don't participate in the same numbers. I definitely acknowledge that these statistics are way too general-- I just posted them after watching the Bill Maher panel discussion and looking up the figures because I do think there's value to analyzing it. We just need more layers than what is offered here IMO.)
 

ansatsusha_gouki

Land of the Heartless
Platinum Member
Fake ass hippies. Types who are all for diversity as long as too much don't come to their neighborhood. And white liberals LOVE to tell black people what to worry about.


Don't you find it funny that white liberals never tell gays,Hispanics and others what they should be worried about but always do it to us..

We had Malcolm X, Dr Martin Luther King Jr,James Baldwin and many others warn us about white liberals and most of us still fall for their bullshit...
 

Rembrandt Brown

Slider
Registered
Fake ass hippies. Types who are all for diversity as long as too much don't come to their neighborhood. And white liberals LOVE to tell black people what to worry about.

Don't you find it funny that white liberals never tell gays,Hispanics and others what they should be worried about but always do it to us..

We had Malcolm X, Dr Martin Luther King Jr,James Baldwin and many others warn us about white liberals and most of us still fall for their bullshit...

Can you guys provide some examples? Most of the white progressives I personally know are pretty cautious/sensitive about that and I can't really think of examples of it from public figures.

You have liberals like Joe Biden talking about how black people should raise their kids but that's conservative Bill Cobsby-esqe poundcake stuff. I can't think of any examples of white leftists saying black people need to worry about _____ or white progressives in general lecturing black people about needing to be more progressive/liberal/left.
 

Famous1

Rising Star
Platinum Member
Dude, you were flat-out fucking wrong. There's no source backing up your misinformed claim. The reason I posted the Google link is literally every source contradicts you.

It's okay to be wrong. Admit it when you are and thank the person who educates you. I do it all the time.



"White progressives"

So you just want to be intentionally dishonest now? You're not that stupid.
do white progressives believe it more than black progressives?
 

Mrfreddygoodbud

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
its kind of blatantly obvious... why..

because those "white" people literally SEE and HEAR shit first hand...

behind all the bullshit smiles and hand shakes, they are in the board rooms,

and by the water cooler.. they hear what is REALLY being said and done behind closed doors...

so that is why they do what they do... they got them front row seats bruh!!!

gotta respect their honesty bruh...
 

Jumbodicc

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
I think black people, at least this black person, knows that racism ain't going anywhere so like usual we adjust to the environment. Think of it like in a few months there will be snow on the ground and people from the north will not view it as a problem. We will clean the car off, plow the streets, and go about our day, much like brothers in the south do not view torrential rain storms and such as a problem for them. Now take a brother from Miami and put him in Chicago and vice versa and the Florida cat will view the snowy winter as a problem and the other the same because of how new the weather is for them. These "Progressive white people" are acting like racism is something they've recently learned about, they are the people from Florida trying to drive around Illinois in the winter telling us how much of a problem it is for them to get around. Black people have been trying to tell people in America about racism forever this is no longer a problem for us, we've learned how to drive on these snowy streets.
 

Rembrandt Brown

Slider
Registered
do white progressives believe it more than black progressives?

I'd love to see a good comparison of the value sets & respective priorities of the two groups, especially including an age breakdown.

I suspect not... But you see where the mainstream discussion is on this. There definitely could/should be more facts injected into the conversation.
 

Famous1

Rising Star
Platinum Member
I'd love to see a good comparison of the value sets & respective priorities of the two groups, especially including an age breakdown.

I suspect not... But you see where the mainstream discussion is on this. There definitely could/should be more facts injected into the conversation.
so exactly what does the poll you cited and those charts and graphs you posted represent? What point are you trying to make?
 

largebillsonlyplease

Large
BGOL Legend
Dude, you were flat-out fucking wrong. There's no source backing up your misinformed claim. The reason I posted the Google link is literally every source contradicts you.

It's okay to be wrong. Admit it when you are and thank the person who educates you. I do it all the time.



"White progressives"

So you just want to be intentionally dishonest now? You're not that stupid.


Resort to name calling I've seen this playbook lol

Anyway

It doesn't matter what minor sub section you talking about.

They don't believe racism is more harmful to black people than black people point blank period.



And if all those progressives voted for Hillary Trump wouldn't be president


Period.


The gop quite literally doesn't have the numbers which is why they resort to voter suppression and gerrymandering and eliminating early voting


Period



Go home and be a family man
 

World B Free

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
The flip side is that we are living in a world where white bubbles are popping like never before. 20 or 30 years ago it was easy for a white person to go their entire life without having one meaningful relationship with a person of color. Few think twice about being racist or having white privilege when everybody you know and interact with looks just like you.

The world doesn't work that way anymore.

these changes caused some white people to vote for Trump and carry out terrorist attacks. They are trying to resist the future anyway they can.

Other white people have accepted or in some cases even embraced that change but doing so means that you have to re-examine white privilege. Once you start doing that it becomes very obvious how racist this world really is.

to put it another way, suppose I told you that there is one gram of cow shit in every McDonald's hamburger. It might convince you to eat more of them out of spite. More likely though, not only would you stop eating there, you would likely re-examine every single burger you ever had. Dwell on it long enough and eventually you would be convinced that contaminated burgers is a biggest problem humanity has ever faced. if someone took a poll that's exactly what you would tell them.

of course eventually you're still going to make that midnight run for a big Mac. cognitive dissidents and cultural conditioning will always bring you back to the same old shit.
I hear what you're saying, but why isn't so difficult for many White people just to look at other non-Whites as human? That doesn't seem so difficult to me. I shouldn't have to fight just to be viewed as human, it makes no sense. White Supremacy is rotten.
 

gene cisco

Not A BGOL Eunuch
BGOL Investor
its kind of blatantly obvious... why..

because those "white" people literally SEE and HEAR shit first hand...

behind all the bullshit smiles and hand shakes, they are in the board rooms,

and by the water cooler.. they hear what is REALLY being said and done behind closed doors...

so that is why they do what they do... they got them front row seats bruh!!!

gotta respect their honesty bruh...
Good point. These people here what other white people really think and say because that's all they around. It's like Yahoo comments in real life.
 

Dannyblueyes

Aka Illegal Danny
BGOL Investor
I hear what you're saying, but why isn't so difficult for many White people just to look at other non-Whites as human? That doesn't seem so difficult to me. I shouldn't have to fight just to be viewed as human, it makes no sense. White Supremacy is rotten.

That's a very good question, but a very hard and painful one to answer.

Best I can figure is that questioning white privilege means questioning everything you've ever accomplished in your life.

Consider something basic like buying a home. It might have taking years and cost you a small fortune, but the only reason you were able to afford it at all is because your bank refused to give mortgages to Black and Brown people on that block or neighborhood. Or maybe your job gave you a raise or promotion at the expense of an equally or more qualified person of color.

Graduated college? Who got rejected so that you can get in?

Have a successful business? how did you get the loan? Why are customers buying off of you?

Overcame a troubled past? Why aren't you in jail right now?

Being white and honest means that you really can't take credit for anything.

On top of that you got a lot of white folks who haven't accomplished anything. Folks working two jobs just to keep a mobile roof over their head and a mayonnaise sandwich in their belly. Suddenly they have to come to grips with the fact that being white is the only thing that keeps them and their kids from living in a damn gutter. That is an incredibly hard reality to face. Many side with Trump because they're just not capable of doing it.

So why can't white people accept non-whites as humans? Because it means accepting, or at least entertaining the possibility that they might be something less.
 

cashwhisperer

My favorite key is E♭
BGOL Investor
Obama probably picked Biden as his running mate to make cacs feel like the presidency was in good hands.
 

World B Free

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
That's a very good question, but a very hard and painful one to answer.

Best I can figure is that questioning white privilege means questioning everything you've ever accomplished in your life.

Consider something basic like buying a home. It might have taking years and cost you a small fortune, but the only reason you were able to afford it at all is because your bank refused to give mortgages to Black and Brown people on that block or neighborhood. Or maybe your job gave you a raise or promotion at the expense of an equally or more qualified person of color.

Graduated college? Who got rejected so that you can get in?

Have a successful business? how did you get the loan? Why are customers buying off of you?

Overcame a troubled past? Why aren't you in jail right now?

Being white and honest means that you really can't take credit for anything.

On top of that you got a lot of white folks who haven't accomplished anything. Folks working two jobs just to keep a mobile roof over their head and a mayonnaise sandwich in their belly. Suddenly they have to come to grips with the fact that being white is the only thing that keeps them and their kids from living in a damn gutter. That is an incredibly hard reality to face. Many side with Trump because they're just not capable of doing it.

So why can't white people accept non-whites as humans? Because it means accepting, or at least entertaining the possibility that they might be something less.
Also, there is violence that goes along with White Supremacy, I wish it were just about bank loans & uncomfortable situations. White Supremacy is really an attack on humanity and human potential, it's looks at another human being as a 'thing;' as a commodity; as fodder in the the heap of living things. It's really madness, & if you think it's difficult for White people trying to face this albatross of a unfairness then try being Black: we're always on the edge; we're always on tight ropes; we're always on ledges peering over the side.
 

Rembrandt Brown

Slider
Registered
Resort to name calling I've seen this playbook lol

Anyway

It doesn't matter what minor sub section you talking about.

They don't believe racism is more harmful to black people than black people point blank period.



And if all those progressives voted for Hillary Trump wouldn't be president


Period.


The gop quite literally doesn't have the numbers which is why they resort to voter suppression and gerrymandering and eliminating early voting


Period



Go home and be a family man

Saying you're not that stupid is not name calling, man. I like you but you were being deliberately obtuse. If you want to participate in conversations like this, you should be willing to learn.

The figure that 53% of white women voted for Trump was thrown around a lot after the election, based on faulty exit polls. Nobody EVER claimed that 53% of college-educated white women voted for Trump. That's just you either misunderstanding or misremembering. The best estimate (which is all you can do with the secret ballot) is that white women voted for Trump by a margin of 47-45%. That's still terrible! Especially with the first female nominee running against such a horrible candidate. According to Pew, Trump won 35% of college-educated white women and 56% of white women without college degrees. Those are dramatically different numbers.

I personally think it's bullshit to blame non-voters when the Democratic party runs a historically unpopular nominee, but we're getting into a different discussion there.
 

Dannyblueyes

Aka Illegal Danny
BGOL Investor
Also, there is violence that goes along with White Supremacy, I wish it were just about bank loans & uncomfortable situations. White Supremacy is really an attack on humanity and human potential, it's looks at another human being as a 'thing;' as a commodity; as fodder in the the heap of living things. It's really madness, & if you think it's difficult for White people trying to face this albatross of a unfairness then try being Black: we're always on the edge; we're always on tight ropes; we're always on ledges peering over the side.

I'm not even going to try and debate who has it worse. We both know the answer to that one. But even then it's still hard enough, especially for a culture of people that aren't used to dealing with these kinds of things. It's like a runner who thinks he's winning a race and suddenly finds out that everyone else has lapped him.

You don't need to have sympathy for this predicament. In fact, it's probably better that you don't. This is something that white people need to figure out for themselves. However, learning about racism and how it affects Black people is an excellent start to figuring out how badly we've been lied to and how to counteract and overcome these liars.

Since coming to the United States 11 years ago every gain I've made came as part of a two-step process.

Step one, listen to white people

Step two, do the opposite of everything they say
 

kefta

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
This is the realist shit a white person has ever said on the internet. All White people are racist



Africans have been saying this since ca. 1542.

BTW, Jane Elliott is a racist/white supremacist suspect until proven otherwise!
 

World B Free

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
I'm not even going to try and debate who has it worse. We both know the answer to that one. But even then it's still hard enough, especially for a culture of people that aren't used to dealing with these kinds of things. It's like a runner who thinks he's winning a race and suddenly finds out that everyone else has lapped him.

You don't need to have sympathy for this predicament. In fact, it's probably better that you don't. This is something that white people need to figure out for themselves. However, learning about racism and how it affects Black people is an excellent start to figuring out how badly we've been lied to and how to counteract and overcome these liars.

Since coming to the United States 11 years ago every gain I've made came as part of a two-step process.

Step one, listen to white people

Step two, do the opposite of everything they say
Man, I wasn't inviting you to a debate about who has it worse, I was just speaking matter-of-factly. Most White people have a level of delusion about race that I cannot understand or fathom; it's a willful blindness that's comfortable to them. Because as we know most White people's biggest fear is to be uncomfortable, there has to be a sweet spot where there's a little bit of blindness and a little bit of fabrication of history to soothe the delusional soul. The naked truth is just too much, let's let bygones be bygones: let the past meander away like those slave ships that drifted off into the Atlantic ocean from the African coast.
 

Dannyblueyes

Aka Illegal Danny
BGOL Investor
Man, I wasn't inviting you to a debate about who has it worse, I was just speaking matter-of-factly. Most White people have a level of delusion about race that I cannot understand or fathom; it's a willful blindness that's comfortable to them. Because as we know most White people's biggest fear is to be uncomfortable, there has to be a sweet spot where there's a little bit of blindness and a little bit of fabrication of history to soothe the delusional soul. The naked truth is just too much, let's let bygones be bygones: let the past meander away like those slave ships that drifted off into the Atlantic ocean from the African coast.

I can't fathom it either. Because the only thing more destructive than the system of white supremacy is the mindset of white supremacy. That mindset isn't just destructive to people of color either. not by a longshot.

Think of how many white people died needlessly violent deaths because the police never investigated the bigger group that lurked behind the shooter in the trenchcoat. Or the 40,000 suicides that occur every year because white people are stockpiling guns waiting for Denmark Vessy to rise from the dead and start an insurrection. The social programs that died on the floor because whites were worried that it might help a Black person make more money than them. We compromised our own democracy to make sure Black people couldn't vote or get elected. The blood thirsty paramilitary cops that run our streets to keep them "safe" from people who don't look like us. I can't fathom how anyone can be comfortable with that.

I honestly think that given enough time bygones really would be bygones if white people would just stop cutting off their nose to spite their face.
 

World B Free

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
I can't fathom it either. Because the only thing more destructive than the system of white supremacy is the mindset of white supremacy. That mindset isn't just destructive to people of color either. not by a longshot.

Think of how many white people died needlessly violent deaths because the police never investigated the bigger group that lurked behind the shooter in the trenchcoat. Or the 40,000 suicides that occur every year because white people are stockpiling guns waiting for Denmark Vessy to rise from the dead and start an insurrection. The social programs that died on the floor because whites were worried that it might help a Black person make more money than them. We compromised our own democracy to make sure Black people couldn't vote or get elected. The blood thirsty paramilitary cops that run our streets to keep them "safe" from people who don't look like us. I can't fathom how anyone can be comfortable with that.

I honestly think that given enough time bygones really would be bygones if white people would just stop cutting off their nose to spite their face.
That mindset of White Supremacy is the reason I don't have much hope in the United States; that mindset would rather see this country be destroyed than to have fair treatment for all Americans. A mindset that would love to see destruction before fairness is a dangerous jumble of ideas that feeds on fear, the kind of the fear that was the under-grid for the 1935 film Birth of a Nation.
 

rude_dog

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
Maybe it's because white progressives realize that racism is what keeps them from having the whitopia like Sweden and Denmark that they desire. They know that white resistance to programs like medicare for all, paid maternal leave and free education is because of white supremacist devotion to the GOP. I don't think all black people are liberal or progressive. I know a lot of people who are actually quite conservative. The most devout Christians I know are black. There are far more white atheists. Black people vote Democrat because we know Republicans don't like us.
 

Dannyblueyes

Aka Illegal Danny
BGOL Investor
That mindset of White Supremacy is the reason I don't have much hope in the United States; that mindset would rather see this country be destroyed than to have fair treatment for all Americans. A mindset that would love to see destruction before fairness is a dangerous jumble of ideas that feeds on fear, the kind of the fear that was the under-grid for the 1935 film Birth of a Nation.

you could be right, but there's another side to it.

We've never met, but based on this conversation I reckon that you're a person who can work and collaborate with just about anyone. Think about what kind of advantage that gives you over all the other people who don't have their mind right. Particularly the ones with pink toes and nipples.

Now in all fairness you try to teach them better. Most are not even willing to listen. Why not find ways to exploit that weakness? Make money off the people they disregard, neglect and disrespect.

As for the future of America, it's not like the land is going to get swallowed into the sea or everyone dies from a self-inflicted nuclear blast. the people we deal with now are going to be pretty much the same as the people we deal with 50 years from now. The only difference is they'll be spending money with a different face on the front.

I'm starting to think that if you can't change them and you can't kill them might as well exploit them.
 

World B Free

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
you could be right, but there's another side to it.

We've never met, but based on this conversation I reckon that you're a person who can work and collaborate with just about anyone. Think about what kind of advantage that gives you over all the other people who don't have their mind right. Particularly the ones with pink toes and nipples.

Now in all fairness you try to teach them better. Most are not even willing to listen. Why not find ways to exploit that weakness? Make money off the people they disregard, neglect and disrespect.

As for the future of America, it's not like the land is going to get swallowed into the sea or everyone dies from a self-inflicted nuclear blast. the people we deal with now are going to be pretty much the same as the people we deal with 50 years from now. The only difference is they'll be spending money with a different face on the front.

I'm starting to think that if you can't change them and you can't kill them might as well exploit them.
I don't have faith in capitalism either, I'm not going to exploit anyone even if they are racist. I don't want to profit from a mindset that sold my ancestors into slavery even If it's to my advantage. This country has a moral rot to it and I'm not interested in partaking in that rot. As the future of America, I'm talking about the White Supremacists would rather break the United States into fiefdoms rather than to respect laws of the country. & those fiefdoms would tear this country apart, to look at a precursor of that then look at the proposals of breaking up the state of California: these people are serious. & I could see a similar proposals be national wide, however next time: different countries would be proposed. Rather than play fair, White Supremacists always change the rules of game; it never fails.



Ccn01vg.png
 

geechiedan

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
Maybe it's because white progressives realize that racism is what keeps them from having the whitopia like Sweden and Denmark that they desire. They know that white resistance to programs like Medicare for all, paid maternal leave and free education is because of white supremacist devotion to the GOP. I don't think all black people are liberal or progressive. I know a lot of people who are actually quite conservative. The most devout Christians I know are black. There are far more white atheists. Black people vote Democrat because we know Republicans don't like us.

Do you realize that thru out American history conservatism has been at the heart of all the strife and conflict we've had? yes democrats created the kkk and fought to keep slavery BUT what no one on the right likes to mention is that the GOP during the 1800s was liberal/progressive compared to the Democrats who were decidedly conservative. Here's a political poster from the period

geary-vs-clymer-poster-annotated.jpg


1860s conservative democrat vs the 1860s radical republican...To support abolitionism IS progressive and liberal...to support civil rights for nonwhites IS progressive and liberal. To want to maintain the status quo of how America has worked even as it means other Americans are excluded is conservative. So the mindset of how minorities and others are perceived and treated in a negative way has ALWAYS been how conservatives have acted regardless of whether they were called democrats (the early-mid to late 1800s to mid-1900s) or republicans (from the late 60s to today)

Todays GOP uses the terms liberal and progressive as pejoratives and derogatorily, betraying the liberal/progressive roots of their party while deluding themselves into believing this generation of republicans are like the ones of the 1800s..that's a joke. Saint Reagan wouldn't be considered a good republican by today's standards.

And the ONLY reason we've come so far is because liberals and progressives dragged the conservatives kicking and screaming into the future.
 

rude_dog

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
Do you realize that thru out American history conservatism has been at the heart of all the strife and conflict we've had? yes democrats created the kkk and fought to keep slavery BUT what no one on the right likes to mention is that the GOP during the 1800s was liberal/progressive compared to the Democrats who were decidedly conservative. Here's a political poster from the period


1860s conservative democrat vs the 1860s radical republican...To support abolitionism IS progressive and liberal...to support civil rights for nonwhites IS progressive and liberal. To want to maintain the status quo of how America has worked even as it means other Americans are excluded is conservative. So the mindset of how minorities and others are perceived and treated in a negative way has ALWAYS been how conservatives have acted regardless of whether they were called democrats (the early-mid to late 1800s to mid-1900s) or republicans (from the late 60s to today)

Todays GOP uses the terms liberal and progressive as pejoratives and derogatorily, betraying the liberal/progressive roots of their party while deluding themselves into believing this generation of republicans are like the ones of the 1800s..that's a joke. Saint Reagan wouldn't be considered a good republican by today's standards.

And the ONLY reason we've come so far is because liberals and progressives dragged the conservatives kicking and screaming into the future.

I said this in another current post, conservative and liberal are just labels that people put on one another and the meanings change over time. I'm well aware of the changing roles of the parties. At it's most basic, Conservatism is to be for small government. Many black people are for small government. We want Government out of our lives. Remember it was government that imposed Jim Crow and enforced segregation. Those are the actions of a big government. Black people are reluctant to change, we have patience and like change in increments. White progressives want massive change now.

The poster is kind of misleading. The Republican party that freed the slaves was Conservative and were for free markets. They were called Radical because they wanted to free the slaves but it was a party of limited government. It takes big government to deprive someone of their God-given freedom. The GOP was founded in the 1850's when the Whig Party dissolved after the Kansas-Nebraska Act. The party drew from both the Whigs and Democrats who opposed slavery. Prior to the Civil War, the Whigs and Democrats were national parties, mixed throughout the North and South. The sectional parties are a legacy from slavery.

Many black people have Conservative views, the problem is the conservative movement has been corrupted by racism. White people love government, they just want the government to maintain white supremacy, such as Jim Crow.The base never of the GOP never really wanted limited government. They were willing to support tax cuts for the wealthy in exchange for the funding for their race war.
 
Last edited:

forcesteeler

Rising Star
Registered
Maybe it's because white progressives realize that racism is what keeps them from having the whitopia like Sweden and Denmark that they desire. They know that white resistance to programs like medicare for all, paid maternal leave and free education is because of white supremacist devotion to the GOP. I don't think all black people are liberal or progressive. I know a lot of people who are actually quite conservative. The most devout Christians I know are black. There are far more white atheists. Black people vote Democrat because we know Republicans don't like us.

The problem with progressive and socialist is that they look too Sweden and Europe when a lot of these countries are moving towards Capitalism and the free market because there social programs have ballooned there budgets.

I would love for the USA to have free programs but remember we have a population of 350 million while Sweden has a population of 19.
 

rude_dog

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
The problem with progressive and socialist is that they look too Sweden and Europe when a lot of these countries are moving towards Capitalism and the free market because there social programs have ballooned there budgets.

I would love for the USA to have free programs but remember we have a population of 350 million while Sweden has a population of 19.

I don't think the Nordic countries consider themselves socialist. We allow the GOP to control the language we use. Language is important, it's dictating the terms of the conversation. Europeans support free markets and capitalism, they also want something in return for investments.
 

Dannyblueyes

Aka Illegal Danny
BGOL Investor
I don't have faith in capitalism either, I'm not going to exploit anyone even if they are racist. I don't want to profit from a mindset that sold my ancestors into slavery even If it's to my advantage. This country has a moral rot to it and I'm not interested in partaking in that rot. As the future of America, I'm talking about the White Supremacists would rather break the United States into fiefdoms rather than to respect laws of the country. & those fiefdoms would tear this country apart, to look at a precursor of that then look at the proposals of breaking up the state of California: these people are serious. & I could see a similar proposals be national wide, however next time: different countries would be proposed. Rather than play fair, White Supremacists always change the rules of game; it never fails.



Ccn01vg.png
I understand what they're trying to do. Under the electoral college system breaking up California would essentially turn it purple. Same with breaking up Texas.

With that said, I personally think that the United States should be broken up into separate countries. The federal government is becoming too corrupt, divisive and overwhelmed to properly manage over 300 million people. On top of that almost every sector has competing economic interests. A federal law that might work well for the automotive industry might cripple the agriculture industry and give unintended loopholes to the the banking industry and so forth. Having everything under one roof slows down economic progress.

As for social progress, most of the things that Warren and Sanders talk about have already been done on city and country levels. San Francisco has a $15 minimum wage and free college. New York City has universal healthcare. Several states have legalized or decriminalized marijuana, etc. Again, the problem is that there's too much corruption and too many competing interests for any of these things to get resolved at the federal level.

It's gotten so bad that almost all of our legislation is passed by the judicial branch. Nine elderly men and women with lifetime appointments have more power to make changes than all of our elected officials combined. It's become one of the most undemocratic systems ever spawned.

Most of all, this model is already working in Europe and Asia, especially in the former Soviet Union.

Imagine what would happen if the USA functioned more like the EU. California and Texas are their own countries. New York is a city state akin to Singapore. The rust belt states have merged and passed laws to revive their factories. The South and Midwest have followed the Danish model and made their agricultural system profitable again.

The dollar still exists, but new countries are able to make their own currencies as well. People are also free to travel and live freely within the land. There's still a US military, but each state decides whether or not to send their troops to a particular campaign. the constitution is reduced to its most basic human rights while each new country gets to fill in the rest and decide how their government is going to be structured.
 
Top