► Alien megastructure mystery deepens: 'Dyson sphere' star found to be dimming dramatically AND plenty of other space / science links, articles & pics

mk23666

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
Mk I'm still waiting.
bear_02.jpg
Sorry, I didn't see the questions. I will reply today when time allows.
 

mk23666

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
Hey MK I got a few questions for you.

1. Why is there a speed limit on light?
2. I heard that some particles can "pop" into existence. Where do they come from?
3. Do black holes really exist? Hawking's radiation?

I have been reminded to keep this short/simple, there are limits to what I can safely share with Hue-Mans at your current level of development.

1. There is only a limit to the speed of light within the medium we (at the moment) exist in. Energy is converted into matter by dropping down out of higher energetic states. Matter can be converted into energy by either increasing it's energetic state or by breaking it down/apart and using those parts in various ways. What you call the speed limit of light is actually the containment barrier to "this" reality and it's Universe. Each individual photon is both a packet of energy AND a packet of information about this reality. Let me see if I can explain it in another way. The information from each photon helps to create all that you see, hear, feel, smell, taste and think. That matter (even in light form) is "matter" to this reality only at certain energy levels that correspond to how this reality works. Going beyond those levels will remove that matter/energy/light from this plane of existence and put it back into it's primordial form. I hope this helps.

2. See above. These particles come out of smashing protons together, your particle accelerators in effect for brief moments force minute parts of matter to move faster than the speed of light in the collision and when they do they pass through the containment barrier. These particles then fall back into/onto this plane of existence as they loose the higher energetic state they were in. Now, if you haven't figured this out by now Let me remind you that there are multiple Dimensions, AND there are multiple Universes as well as multiple Realities all existing at the same time. All separate but also all as one whole. So what I'm trying to say is that in many instances where particles have been observed to "naturally" pop into existence, and then disappear just as quickly, is due to similar (or exactly the same) kinds of scientific experiments in other Realities or in other Dimensions or even in other Universes.

That is not to suggest that it doesn't happen naturally because it does, but it is not permitted at this time for me to explain how this is done.

3. Yes, black holes do exist. They are in fact natural examples of where light/matter/energy can be pushed beyond the speed of light and breach the barrier that contains this reality. Once you get beyond the event horizon the "speed limit" is unlimited.

Hawking's has it partially wrong, he is correct that the information that went into the black hole isn't lost, he is also correct about the way in which Hawking's Radiation is produced at the event horizon. But he is wrong about black holes evaporating away. Instead what you are witnessing is the shrinking of the event horizon which isn't exactly the same as what he describes as the evaporation of the black hole ... As the event horizon shrinks from the outside it is also being pulled into the black hole at the same time. This will continue until the black hole and the event horizon touch and close off from this reality.

I liken it to this example. Imagine you have a huge circular pool of steaming hot water and it is being emptied by a small drain in the middle of the pool. The drain in this example is the actual black hole. The water above/around it is the event horizon, and the steam coming off the surface of the water is your Hawking's Radiation.

Again, I am sorry for my delay in answering your questions.
 

The Untouchable GDFOLKS

Real Niggas Get Real Pussy
BGOL Investor
I have been reminded to keep this short/simple, there are limits to what I can safely share with Hue-Mans at your current level of development.

1. There is only a limit to the speed of light within the medium we (at the moment) exist in. Energy is converted into matter by dropping down out of higher energetic states. Matter can be converted into energy by either increasing it's energetic state or by breaking it down/apart and using those parts in various ways. What you call the speed limit of light is actually the containment barrier to "this" reality and it's Universe. Each individual photon is both a packet of energy AND a packet of information about this reality. Let me see if I can explain it in another way. The information from each photon helps to create all that you see, hear, feel, smell, taste and think. That matter (even in light form) is "matter" to this reality only at certain energy levels that correspond to how this reality works. Going beyond those levels will remove that matter/energy/light from this plane of existence and put it back into it's primordial form. I hope this helps.

2. See above. These particles come out of smashing protons together, your particle accelerators in effect for brief moments force minute parts of matter to move faster than the speed of light in the collision and when they do they pass through the containment barrier. These particles then fall back into/onto this plane of existence as they loose the higher energetic state they were in. Now, if you haven't figured this out by now Let me remind you that there are multiple Dimensions, AND there are multiple Universes as well as multiple Realities all existing at the same time. All separate but also all as one whole. So what I'm trying to say is that in many instances where particles have been observed to "naturally" pop into existence, and then disappear just as quickly, is due to similar (or exactly the same) kinds of scientific experiments in other Realities or in other Dimensions or even in other Universes.

That is not to suggest that it doesn't happen naturally because it does, but it is not permitted at this time for me to explain how this is done.

3. Yes, black holes do exist. They are in fact natural examples of where light/matter/energy can be pushed beyond the speed of light and breach the barrier that contains this reality. Once you get beyond the event horizon the "speed limit" is unlimited.

Hawking's has it partially wrong, he is correct that the information that went into the black hole isn't lost, he is also correct about the way in which Hawking's Radiation is produced at the event horizon. But he is wrong about black holes evaporating away. Instead what you are witnessing is the shrinking of the event horizon which isn't exactly the same as what he describes as the evaporation of the black hole ... As the event horizon shrinks from the outside it is also being pulled into the black hole at the same time. This will continue until the black hole and the event horizon touch and close off from this reality.

I liken it to this example. Imagine you have a huge circular pool of steaming hot water and it is being emptied by a small drain in the middle of the pool. The drain in this example is the actual black hole. The water above/around it is the event horizon, and the steam coming off the surface of the water is your Hawking's Radiation.

Again, I am sorry for my delay in answering your questions.
One more goofy ass word and I will post all your REAL information in this thread..think Im fucking around.

People want real conversations about this topic ans this fairy tale shit is derailing.

You have one more time and I will take that ban.
 
Last edited:

Creatine Steve

Support BGOL
Registered
You a fag son. Nigga says he wants real convos about space on a porn board. I don't know any real GD's that fuck with random people unwarranted. You soft boo. I won't say no more.

One more goofy ass word and I will post all your REAL information in this thread..think Im fucking around.

People want real conversations about this topic ans this fairy tale shit is detailing.

You have one more time and I will take that ban.
 

RoadRage

the voice of reason
BGOL Investor
Hey MK I got a few questions for you.

1. Why is there a speed limit on light?
2. I heard that some particles can "pop" into existence. Where do they come from?
3. Do black holes really exist? Hawking's radiation?
Let me see if I can answer those questions for you in a simple manner..

1- The speed of light is constant, there is no explanation for why but its measured speed is the same, or relatively the same..
2- No there is no particles that can pop into existence, what you refer to particles are really sub atomic particles which are very mysterious and obey by laws outside of normal physics, hence the name quantum physics..
3- Yes black holes exist, Hawkin radiation is believed to be captured photos glowing at the edge of the even horizon...
 

futureshock

Renegade of this atomic age
Registered
UFO lights spotted blinking in the night sky could be 'communication attempt' say experts

10:38, 19 OCT 2016
UPDATED 11:07, 19 OCT 2016
BY KIRSTIE MCCRUM




The clip was taken in total darkness, with multiple pinpricks of light dancing in the sky - and no one knows what they were

Unusual lights have been captured in the night sky with observers claiming they belonged to ALIEN SPACECRAFT .

UFO spotters have been buzzing online following the release of the video captured in the skies over Charlotte, North Carolina on October 15.

The footage appears to show a cluster of between five and 10 lights moving seemingly randomly in the darkness.

"Wow, what is it?" says a voice on the recording, as the camera stays trained on the moving illuminations.

The man behind the camera says: "At first I was thinking that they were like flares off a chopper... but they're moving very strangely."

UFO-spotted-in-the-skies-above-Charlotte-North-Carolina.jpg

The lights were recorded on film over Charlotte, NC
The footage was shared on YouTube by C Hulbert , and commenters are split on its provenance.

One credited the filmmaker with his clip, adding: "This is amazing. Best footage I've seen in a while."

But another says that they look like "sky lanterns seen through air pollution," adding: "They blink because they are moving and spinning and the visibility is low. It's also why they keep ascending higher and higher.

"Go home folks, no aliens to see here."

UFO-spotted-in-the-skies-above-Charlotte-North-Carolina.jpg

One commenter believes they were using Binary language to communicate
In response to the 'blinking' of the lights, a commenter online says that it looks like binary language.

"It's a communication attempt. There are three luminosities for each light and two patterns with all the lights."

Unfortunately, any message has been lost, as the user adds: "I can't tell where the repetition point is because you move around too much."


 

futureshock

Renegade of this atomic age
Registered
WikiLeaks exposes Vatican’s knowledge of aliens and impending war in space?
By
David Reyes
October 21, 2016
18971861_f5c48e8d1c_b-1.jpg




Just recently, a new batch of documents released by WikiLeaks claimed that the Vatican has some knowledge about alien life and the possibility of a war in space. This, along with other supposedly confidential information, was included in a supposed email between astronaut Edgar Mitchell and Hillary Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta.

According to sources, the email mentioned aliens who are aiming to help mankind, but are “scared of our violent tendencies.” The email goes on to mention a certain Terri Mansfield, who is supposedly the director of the Extra Terrestrial Intelligence (ETI) Peace Task Force.


Mitchell, also credited to be the sixth man to walk on the moon during Apollo 14, reportedly wrote to Podesta on Jan 18, 2015, requesting for a meeting to discuss ETI and zero point energy (ZPE)- a technology which theoretically can be an unlimited supply of energy for the planet.

The email also mentioned a meeting attended by Terri Mansfeld ““to bring us up to date on the Vatican’s awareness of ETI.”

Space War possible according to email released by WikiLeaks
Mitchell went on to mention in his email that the “nonviolent ETI” are helping share ZPE with earth, but will not “tolerate any forms of military violence on Earth or in space.” He also emphasized the it is about time that the government admitted the truth about aliens, and that earth has already been visited by extraterrestrial life in the past.


A copy of one of Mitchell’s emails released by WikiLeaks can be seen below.

“Dear John, as 2015 unfolds, I understand you are leaving the Administration in February. It is urgent that we agree on a date and time to meet to discuss Disclosure and Zero Point Energy, at your earliest available after your departure. My Catholic colleague Terri Mansfield will be there too, to bring us up to date on the Vatican’s awareness of ETI. Another colleague is working on a new Space Treaty, citing involvement with Russia and China. However with Russia’s extreme interference in Ukraine, I believe we must pursue another route for peace in space and ZPE on Earth. I met with President Obama’s Honolulu childhood friend, US Ambassador Pamela Hamamoto on July 4 at the US Mission in Geneva, when I was able to tell her briefly about Zero Point Energy. I believe we can enlist her as a confidante and resource in our presentation for President Obama. I appreciate Eryn’s assistance in working with Terri to set up our meeting.”

So could all this be a ruse? If you believe in WikiLeaks, then obviously not.

Let us know what you think in the comment section below.
 
Last edited:

futureshock

Renegade of this atomic age
Registered
WIKILEAKS’ EMAIL LEAKS UNCOVER THE VATICAN’S POSSIBLE KNOWLEDGE OF EXTRATERRESTRIALS
ARJUN WALIA
OCTOBER 10, 2016

vatican-759x500.jpg

Yesterday, we published an article detailing the most recent leaks made by Wikileaks’ Julian Assange, which included the disclosure of more emails connected to the Clinton Campaign. This time, it was John Podesta’s account, showing multiple emails from Dr. Edgar Mitchell, Apollo 14 astronaut, showing how Mitchell (1940-2016) had big plans, and big meetings set up.


Edgar Mitchell was very active in moving the “disclosure” process by discussing the matter with various contacts inside of the White House and Pentagon, along with the Disclosure Project’s Dr. Steven Greer.

Here is one of the emails that was recently released by Wikileaks, and it mentions the Vatican:

“Dear John, As 2015 unfolds, I understand you are leaving the Administration in February. It is urgent that we agree on a date and time to meet to discuss Disclosure and Zero Point Energy, at your earliest available after your departure. My Catholic colleague Terri Mansfield will be there too, to bring us up to date on the Vatican’s awareness of ETI. Another colleague is working on a new Space Treaty, citing involvement with Russia and China. However with Russia’s extreme interference in Ukraine, I believe we must pursue another route for peace in space and ZPE on Earth. I met with President Obama’s Honolulu childhood friend, US Ambassador Pamela Hamamoto on July 4 at the US Mission in Geneva, when I was able to tell her briefly about Zero Point Energy. I believe we can enlist her as a confidante and resource in our presentation for President Obama. I appreciate Eryn’s assistance in working with Terri to set up our meeting.” (source)

The Vatican & ETs
As you can imagine, the topic of extraterrestrial life dives into various sub-topics, and one of them is the religious interpretation of extraterrestrials, and there are many.

The first step, however, seems to be to have religious people accept the fact that ‘ET’ doesn’t have to contradict what they believe in.
 

futureshock

Renegade of this atomic age
Registered
Newly identified "pumpkin" stars spin scary fast
Colin Jeffrey
October 28th, 2016


pumpkin-stars-1.jpg

An artist's impression of one of the pumpkin stars



In this season of ghouls and goblins, it turns out even space agencies can get swept up in the Halloween spirit. Two years ago, NASA treated us all with an image of the sun resembling a jack-o-lantern. Last year, the organization told us about the Great Pumpkin asteroid heading our way for Halloween. And now, NASA has just dropped news about pumpkin stars, fiery balls of gas that spin so fast that they squash down from perfect spheres to shapes that do in fact resemble the fruit millions of people carve up every October.

In fact, astronomers using observations from NASA's Kepler and Swift missions have discovered a whole batch of rapidly spinning stars that produce X-rays at more than 100 times the peak levels ever seen from our Sun. The stars, which spin so fast they've been squashed into pumpkin-like shapes, are thought to be the result of close binary systems where two sun-like stars merge.

pumpkin-stars-2.jpg

The stars, which spin so fast they've been squashed into pumpkin-like shapes, are thought to be the result of close binary systems where two sun-like stars merge

"These 18 stars rotate in just a few days on average, while the sun takes nearly a month," said Steve Howell, a senior research scientist at NASA's Ames Research Center in Moffett Field, California, and leader of the team. "The rapid rotation amplifies the same kind of activity we see on the sun, such as sunspots and solar flares, and essentially sends it into overdrive."

The most extreme member of the group, a K-type orange giant dubbed KSw 71, is more than 10 times larger than the sun, rotates in just 5.5 days, and produces X-ray emissions 4,000 times greater than the sun does at solar maximum.

pumpkin-stars-4.jpg

The pumpkin stars are thought to be the result of binary stars merging

These rare stars were found as part of an X-ray survey of the original Kepler field of view, a patch of the sky comprising parts of the constellations Cygnus and Lyra. From May 2009 to May 2013, Kepler measured the brightness of more than 150,000 stars in this region to detect the regular dimming from planets passing in front of their host stars.

"A side benefit of the Kepler mission is that its initial field of view is now one of the best-studied parts of the sky," said team member Padi Boyd, a researcher at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, who designed the Swift survey. Using the X-ray and ultraviolet/optical telescopes aboard Swift, the researchers conducted the Kepler–Swift Active Galaxies and Stars Survey (KSwAGS), taking the research further by imaging about six square degrees, or 12 times the apparent size of a full moon, in the Kepler field.

pumpkin-stars-3.jpg

It's believed the stars in the new survey have only recently dissipated their disks

"With KSwAGS we found 93 new X-ray sources, about evenly split between active galaxies and various types of X-ray stars," said team member Krista Lynne Smith, a graduate student at the University of Maryland, College Park who led the analysis of Swift data. "Many of these sources have never been observed before in X-rays or ultraviolet light."

The researchers used Kepler measurements to determine the rotation periods and sizes for 10 of the stars, which range from 2.9 to 10.5 times larger than the sun. Their surface temperatures range from somewhat hotter to slightly cooler than the sun. Astronomers classify the stars as subgiants and giants, which are more advanced evolutionary phases than the Sun's, caused by greater depletion of their primary fuel source, hydrogen. All of them eventually will become much larger red giant stars.

Forty years ago, Ronald Webbink at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign noted that close binary systems cannot survive once the fuel supply of one star dwindles and it starts to enlarge. The stars coalesce to form a single rapidly spinning star initially residing in a so-called "excretion" disk formed by gas thrown out during the merger. The disk dissipates over the next 100 million years, leaving behind a very active, rapidly spinning star.

Howell and his colleagues suggest that their 18 KSwAGS stars formed by this scenario and have only recently dissipated their disks. To identify so many stars passing through such a cosmically brief phase of development is a real boon to stellar astronomers.

"Webbink's model suggests we should find about 160 of these stars in the entire Kepler field," said co-author Elena Mason, a researcher at the Italian National Institute for Astrophysics Astronomical Observatory of Trieste. "What we have found is in line with theoretical expectations when we account for the small portion of the field we observed with Swift."

The team has already extended their Swift observations to additional fields mapped by the K2 mission.


The findings ave been published online in the Astrophysical Journal.
 
Top