2024 Chicago Bears Season Thread

Pworld297

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
All things being equal, I just hope Justin watched enough film of his sliding technique and adjusts accordingly, he’s taken some hits these first couple of years that’ve knocked out other QBs for WEEKS.

I also hope the league office showed officials his sliding technique and then laid into them about how many roughing calls they flat out ignored. 90% of the hits he took should’ve been 15 years and one or two ejections.
Those late hit no calls had me ready to put a jersey on... Lol Seriously though that shit was just ridiculous. He needs to start getting those calls.

He will be better in the pocket because his line will be better. He also has better wideouts plus Kmet came on last year. Him being able to pass from the pocket will make him even deadlier in the run game. We got a QB who can take it 80 yards to the house.... :yes:
 
  • Like
Reactions: cnc

Lou_Kayge

Rising Star
Registered
Thought hit me recently while watching Bears games on YouTube from the Lovie and Trestman eras. I have been a Bears fan since '82/83ish. Since unconditional free-agency started in '93 the Bears have signed vet FA rb's such as: Merril Hoge, Lewis Tillman, Craig Heyward (was he traded for?), Thomas Jones, Kevin Jones, Marion Barber II Michael Bush, Mike Davis and this off-season D'onte Foreman and Travis Homer. Discounting Foreman and Homer, since we haven't seen them play yet, isn't it weird that Thomas Jones was the only productive to good vet FA rb we've signed in recently decades? We've done better drafting at the position.
 

Complex

Internet Superstar
BGOL Investor
Thought hit me recently while watching Bears games on YouTube from the Lovie and Trestman eras. I have been a Bears fan since '82/83ish. Since unconditional free-agency started in '93 the Bears have signed vet FA rb's such as: Merril Hoge, Lewis Tillman, Craig Heyward (was he traded for?), Thomas Jones, Kevin Jones, Marion Barber II Michael Bush, Mike Davis and this off-season D'onte Foreman and Travis Homer. Discounting Foreman and Homer, since we haven't seen them play yet, isn't it weird that Thomas Jones was the only productive to good vet FA rb we've signed in recently decades? We've done better drafting at the position.

and got rid of Thomas Jones too soon
 

Pworld297

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
Man this whole Jaylon Johnson shit got me so irritated about him not showing up to voluntary OTA's. They collectively bargain for this but media and some fans acting as if he should be there regardless, saying he's not a leader because he's not there. Dude on this podcast actually said yeah I understand him spending time with his daughter and doing a fundraiser for his close friend who died but he still should be at voluntary OTA's.. Smh lol WTF? I would tell the media, fans and the coaches to kiss my black ass lol. I get if you are a rookie or new to the team but a vet showing up to voluntary OTA's? :smh:

 

c_commander

Up and Coming Asshole
BGOL Investor


Thought hit me recently while watching Bears games on YouTube from the Lovie and Trestman eras. I have been a Bears fan since '82/83ish. Since unconditional free-agency started in '93 the Bears have signed vet FA rb's such as: Merril Hoge, Lewis Tillman, Craig Heyward (was he traded for?), Thomas Jones, Kevin Jones, Marion Barber II Michael Bush, Mike Davis and this off-season D'onte Foreman and Travis Homer. Discounting Foreman and Homer, since we haven't seen them play yet, isn't it weird that Thomas Jones was the only productive to good vet FA rb we've signed in recently decades? We've done better drafting at the position.
Most of those guys were either backups and unproven with serious playing time, backups or on their last legs
Traditionally the team hasn't been good at acquiring free agents period.
Man this whole Jaylon Johnson shit got me so irritated about him not showing up to voluntary OTA's. They collectively bargain for this but media and some fans acting as if he should be there regardless, saying he's not a leader because he's not there. Dude on this podcast actually said yeah I understand him spending time with his daughter and doing a fundraiser for his close friend who died but he still should be at voluntary OTA's.. Smh lol WTF? I would tell the media, fans and the coaches to kiss my black ass lol. I get if you are a rookie or new to the team but a vet showing up to voluntary OTA's? :smh:


He's apparently watching film and is attending meeting virtually so it's not like he completely blew the OTAs off. People are going to bitch regardless
 

Madrox

Vaya Con Dio
BGOL Investor
Man this whole Jaylon Johnson shit got me so irritated about him not showing up to voluntary OTA's. They collectively bargain for this but media and some fans acting as if he should be there regardless, saying he's not a leader because he's not there. Dude on this podcast actually said yeah I understand him spending time with his daughter and doing a fundraiser for his close friend who died but he still should be at voluntary OTA's.. Smh lol WTF? I would tell the media, fans and the coaches to kiss my black ass lol. I get if you are a rookie or new to the team but a vet showing up to voluntary OTA's? :smh:

Most of those guys were either backups and unproven with serious playing time, backups or on their last legs
Traditionally the team hasn't been good at acquiring free agents period.

He's apparently watching film and is attending meeting virtually so it's not like he completely blew the OTAs off. People are going to bitch regardless

Yea the media (ESPECIALLY the Chicago media) do this bullshit every year: they would rather talk about who isn't there and be all in that man's business vs who actually IS there and report to us how they look. Like ya'll already said, it's voluntary and JJ has his reasons that he's communicated to the team. On top of that, honestly, I don't mind the 2 rookie corners getting more reps and exposure in his absence (Stevenson and Smith).

Everything could be going right and the Chi Media will still ask triflin' ass questions and report on the one or two things that cause the most drama. JJ said he would def be there for the next session... so just like all the pre-draft trade talk revolving around Fields, and the countless other non-stories they seem to come up with, this will fade into oblivion w/ in a few weeks.

They love wasting their time and getting like 10% of the fanbase hot n bothered by whatever minor issues they seem to think are important. JUST REPORT ON THE TEAM! Especially when you have limited access to practice, makes no sense spending your time and the 1 or two opportunities you have to ask questions on dude who ain't even attending yet.
 

Pworld297

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
Yea the media (ESPECIALLY the Chicago media) do this bullshit every year: they would rather talk about who isn't there and be all in that man's business vs who actually IS there and report to us how they look. Like ya'll already said, it's voluntary and JJ has his reasons that he's communicated to the team. On top of that, honestly, I don't mind the 2 rookie corners getting more reps and exposure in his absence (Stevenson and Smith).

Everything could be going right and the Chi Media will still ask triflin' ass questions and report on the one or two things that cause the most drama. JJ said he would def be there for the next session... so just like all the pre-draft trade talk revolving around Fields, and the countless other non-stories they seem to come up with, this will fade into oblivion w/ in a few weeks.

They love wasting their time and getting like 10% of the fanbase hot n bothered by whatever minor issues they seem to think are important. JUST REPORT ON THE TEAM! Especially when you have limited access to practice, makes no sense spending your time and the 1 or two opportunities you have to ask questions on dude who ain't even attending yet.
Well said bruh, like you said they do this every year. It's mad annoying! I heard one reporter say he has plenty of time off in the off-season so he should be there, wtf? I will be glad when training camp starts.
 

Madrox

Vaya Con Dio
BGOL Investor
He's apparently watching film and is attending meeting virtually so it's not like he completely blew the OTAs off. People are going to bitch regardless

Well said bruh, like you said they do this every year. It's mad annoying! I heard one reporter say he has plenty of time off in the off-season so he should be there, wtf? I will be glad when training camp starts.

 

cheyisrameyah

Rising Star
Platinum Member

Team A is my choice. The running game with Fields and Payton would be insane. The play action possibilities due to the defense having to respect the run would be nice. You could have a decent defense and still get by.

With Team B, is a boom or bust offense. Cutler could make the offense look like a thing of beauty and utterly repulsive on the same damn drive. The defense better be legit with a team like that.
 

darth frosty

Dark Lord of the Sith
BGOL Investor







In a statement to NBC Chicago Friday, the Bears said while they are still working on the Arlington Heights location, "it is no longer our singular focus."

“The Chicago Bears goal of building the largest single development project in Illinois history led by billions of dollars in private capital investment, and the jobs and economic benefits generated, is at risk in Arlington Heights," the team's statement read. "The stadium-based project remains broadly popular in Arlington Heights, Chicagoland and the state. However, the property’s original assessment at five times the 2021 tax value, and the recent settlement with Churchill Downs for 2022 being three times higher, fails to reflect the property is not operational and not commercially viable in its current state. We will continue the ongoing demolition activity and work toward a path forward in Arlington Heights, but it is no longer our singular focus. It is our responsibility to listen to other municipalities in Chicagoland about potential locations that can deliver on this transformational opportunity for our fans, our club and the State of Illinois.”

Outside of Chicago, a spokesperson for Naperville also confirmed Mayor Scott Wehrli "reached out to the Chicago Bears organization to introduce as a thriving community with multiple opportunities for business investment."

"With economic development as one of his primary focuses, the mayor will continue to highlight Naperville’s benefits to businesses throughout Chicagoland and across the country," spokesperson Linda LaCloche said in a statement, "These benefits include having the second largest economy in Illinois, along with a highly educated workforce, top ranked public safety, a vibrant downtown, excellent public transit and close proximity to major interstates, making it an attractive community for all types of business investment."

In a letter to Bears President and CEO Kevin Warren last week, Wehrli touted the community's accessibility and said there are several sites already available or soon-to-be available for the Bears' future home.

"As a lifelong Bears fan, I respect that the team has decided that developing and operating its own stadium is essential for on-field success and pursuing championships," the letter read. "On behalf of the City of Naperville, I would like to formally introduce our community to your organization as you consider or reassess your planned relocation. The city would welcome the opportunity to review your business needs and our available properties."

The team had most recently received sign-off to begin the initial phase of demolition plans in Arlington Heights.

The village posted on its website last month that approval was given for Phase 1 of the project, which allows for interior demolition, specifically knocking down the grandstand, office and jockey building.

The village of Arlington Heights released a statement Friday after the team revealed that it's exploring other possible locations.

"...The Village has always expected that the club would explore any and all viable locations as part of their due diligence process," the statement read, in part.

The village went on to tout the benefits of the Arlington Park location, such as having a dedicated Metra station and easy access to O'Hare Airport as well as Interstate 90 and Route 53.

"It is clear that the Chicago Bears Football Club understands the unique potential of this site, as evidenced by their recent purchase of the property," the statement continued. "The Village is committed to work with the club and all other regional stakeholders to continue to explore the potential redevelopment of this site and to work through the inevitable challenges that come with any large development effort."

In recent weeks, the potential move to Arlington Heights got a little more complicated after the Cook County Assessor hiked the assessed value of the team’s newly acquired land, meaning their property tax bill could be headed for a major increase.

The team closed on the purchase of the 326-acre site that held the former Arlington International Racecourse in February, paying $197.2 million for the property. The previous assessed value sat at roughly $33 million, but as part of the triennial reassessment, Assessor Fritz Kaegi’s office placed its value at $197 million. That increase could hike the property tax bill proportionally, spelling out a potential sixfold spike.

The Bears are asking the Board of Review to reassess the tax value of the property. A hearing is expected to take place on the matter in June.

"Our office’s mission is to assess property based on market value," a spokesperson for the Cook County Assessor's office said Friday.

"The 2022 assessment of the former Arlington Racecourse site is consistent with both the 2023 purchase price of the property and the price per square foot of other similarly sized land in the area. The facts speak for themselves."
 
Top