Ahmaud Aubery shooting Video. They claimed self defense. The video shows Pre-Meditated Murder; UPDATE ALL 3 CACS GUILTY of Felony and Malice MURDER!
- Thread starter Tiger_Hood
- Start date
This cac told the truth but he tells it from a cac perspective. He speaks from the perspective of a cac vigilante.
I knew that surveillance video was the difference. Those rednecks clung onto that shit with everything they had, and now, coupled with those BS police reports, and the glue of that shitty Southern Georgia Law OCGA 17-4-60, I can't see how they'll do any time once this gets to court.
It's gon be vigilante self defense that took a wrong turn.
Fucking fuckity fuck!
It's gon be vigilante self defense that took a wrong turn.
Fucking fuckity fuck!
Everyone gotta join https://www.facebook.com/groups/472384173116722/
Justice For Gregory and Travis McMichael
Looks like Black Folk have taken over the page,
Lets keep it up
Justice For Gregory and Travis McMichael
Looks like Black Folk have taken over the page,
Lets keep it up
Back in the day while riding bikes we would come across property under construction while an adult I'd come across property under construction and just check it out
I'm sure plenty of white ppl stumbled upon that exact site
I was a carpenter for 3 yrs I can't count on both hands how many ppl would walk into our work areas yes its trespassing but it's not even that serious it's just curious ppl
When doing landscaping white ppl would walk on my clients property all the time to check out the job we were doing some would hire us; most would just look and keep it moving
I'm sure plenty of white ppl stumbled upon that exact site
I was a carpenter for 3 yrs I can't count on both hands how many ppl would walk into our work areas yes its trespassing but it's not even that serious it's just curious ppl
When doing landscaping white ppl would walk on my clients property all the time to check out the job we were doing some would hire us; most would just look and keep it moving
Last edited:
I knew that surveillance video was the difference. Those rednecks clung onto that shit with everything they had, and now, coupled with those BS police reports, and the glue of that shitty Southern Georgia Law OCGA 17-4-60, I can't see how they'll do any time once this gets to court.
It's gon be vigilante self defense that took a wrong turn.
Fucking fuckity fuck!
I'm studying this case. I don't think that 17-4-60 is gonna fly.
Explain
I heard that under GA law a house under construction is considered a public place. I haven't verified that yet though so don't quote me. But I don't think a home under construction can be considered a dwelling and I believe it has to be a dwelling in order to be burglarized.
But also, they can't use 17-4-60 because they didn't have solid first hand probable cause like they claimed. They were mistaken.
District Attorney George Barnhill, the second prosecutor to take the case before recusing himself, sent an April 7 email noting “video of Arbery burglarizing a home immediately preceding the chase and confrontation.”
Investigators have not said there is any evidence that Arbery burglarized the home. Police reports following the killing did not note any stolen material on Arbery. He did not take anything from the construction site. He did not cause any damage to the property and was not instructed by anyone to leave, but rather left of his own accord to continue on his jog. And he was unarmed.
Got it. Couple of things I can see them arguing ..
The information they gathered on Arbery on the day came from the man across the street. The man who came out of his house and noticed Arbery in the public space. The 911 call corroborates that action. Phone records will most likely reveal that he called Travis McMichael and William Bryan shortly after, which would make that information valid.
Burglary isn’t the same as theft. You could walk into a private place and not take anything and commit burglary. If it turns out that construction places are indeed public spaces, then that’s a win.
However the videos released yesterday would most likely implicate Arbery and let these CAC’s off for the following reasons:
1) he enters the construction site, which as of right now is private property
2) he enters it hesitantly. Videos shows him check the area before entering to see if anyone was watching him showing his wrongdoing
3) Arbery notices the camera inside the construction site and stares at it and has the “oh shit” moment..
and the most telling of all
4) he books. If he in fact didn’t do anything wrong, why run?
Now I’m no lawyer, and I’m hoping someone on BGOL’s Law team can step in here to clarify, but these things tied together, plus these CAC’s police report of “we knew someone was committing burglary in our neighborhood prior to this incident...”, paints them in the light of being vigilantes protecting their neighborhood, opposed to being the racist Southern CAC’s they probably are.
I hope I’m wrong.
The information they gathered on Arbery on the day came from the man across the street. The man who came out of his house and noticed Arbery in the public space. The 911 call corroborates that action. Phone records will most likely reveal that he called Travis McMichael and William Bryan shortly after, which would make that information valid.
Burglary isn’t the same as theft. You could walk into a private place and not take anything and commit burglary. If it turns out that construction places are indeed public spaces, then that’s a win.
However the videos released yesterday would most likely implicate Arbery and let these CAC’s off for the following reasons:
1) he enters the construction site, which as of right now is private property
2) he enters it hesitantly. Videos shows him check the area before entering to see if anyone was watching him showing his wrongdoing
3) Arbery notices the camera inside the construction site and stares at it and has the “oh shit” moment..
and the most telling of all
4) he books. If he in fact didn’t do anything wrong, why run?
Now I’m no lawyer, and I’m hoping someone on BGOL’s Law team can step in here to clarify, but these things tied together, plus these CAC’s police report of “we knew someone was committing burglary in our neighborhood prior to this incident...”, paints them in the light of being vigilantes protecting their neighborhood, opposed to being the racist Southern CAC’s they probably are.
I hope I’m wrong.
Last edited:
Also, Barnhill claimed Arbery attacked Travis. But Travis wasn't just open carrying, he had the gun pointed at Arbery which gave Arbery the right to self-defend, not Travis.
AND, there were no prior police reports of burglaries in that area for 6 weeks. They had official statements from neighbors saying a weapon was stolen from a car....but still, no police reports on record.
AND, there were no prior police reports of burglaries in that area for 6 weeks. They had official statements from neighbors saying a weapon was stolen from a car....but still, no police reports on record.
Quickest burglary ever.
Check out the comments if you want a crash course on alt-right fuckery. Look up what this shit means:
(Replace "jogger" with the n word, look up the exact phrase online and get familiar with these memes)
Y,'all boomer "centrists" have no idea how these far right wing CACs move on the internet at all
Dude was jogging in workout clothes, t-shirt and shorts, if something had been stolen, where is he going to put it...
I'm not a lawyer and I'm not sure what the precedent is, but doesnt Arbery have a right to stand his grown if the action to cut him off could have harmed him?
I thought Barnhill was off this case?
Burglary involves entering a structure with the intent to commit a crime. What solid probable cause did they have that he entered with intent to commit a crime? I think this is why the GBI stepped in and made the arrest. The GBI said Arbery did not take part in any felony, had no illegal substances (not even weed, the boy was clean!) in his system and was not armed. The footage of the so-called burglary was viewed by the GBI before they made the arrest, so had it been seen as a burglary, they probably would not have made the arrest.
He is. I was just stating his report prior to recusing himself.
Well this depends on what’s on the remaining video footage. We only saw a looped 4 second clip of him entering and looking around.
There’s still another 3 mins of that video that’s being investigated, that hasn’t been released yet, plus the additional footage of the security cameras from days prior that started this whole thing.
Those tapes will decide this.
Still, I'm saying that the GBI said that Arbery did not take part in any felony. The GBI is saying the killing was not justified.
Yup. Let’s hope it stays this way.
Shaun King
· 25 mins ·
FYI. White people all over Brunswick stopped and looked at that house. It was strange. It had no windows or doors. People all over the neighborhood went in it. Real estate agents told us they went in it. And several said they even saw the McMichaels. Except they were all white.
I knew that surveillance video was the difference. Those rednecks clung onto that shit with everything they had, and now, coupled with those BS police reports, and the glue of that shitty Southern Georgia Law OCGA 17-4-60, I can't see how they'll do any time once this gets to court.
It's gon be vigilante self defense that took a wrong turn.
Fucking fuckity fuck!
The GBI is simply putting together a detailed timeline of events, something the local PD failed to do. Looking over a construction out of curiosity before continuing on a jog is not burglary. That irrelevant tidbit of Arbery visiting a construction site is not helping the rationale for the murderer clan, which, so far, has been arrested, charged, and denied bail.
The GA law you cited doesn't apply to cold blooded murder, much less an adequate defense during trial:
"§ 17-4-60 - Grounds for arrest. A private person may arrest an offender if the offense is committed in his presence or within his immediate knowledge. If the offense is a felony and the offender is escaping or attempting to escape, a private person may arrest him upon reasonable and probable grounds of suspicion."
Let’s hope you’re right
That video is damning and the reason behind the GBI making the arrest after the DA (same one that initially recussed herself but personally got involved to prevent any arrests) contacted the GBI. Her hand was forced. She didn't contact the GBI sooner when her office 1st received the case.
Shit has hit the fan for both DAs. The local PD has turned on them with statements with receipts showing that the DA prevented the arrest after recusing herself. The release of that video was a game change in this case. If local PD and the DAs that kicked the can saw the vid but didn't act, their both fucked as well. It will all come out in the wash.
Quickest burglary ever.
i kinda glad this video but also think it hurts him. I’m glad it came out because cacs had started pushing a false rumor thst he had on cargo shorts and heavy work boots, we see that is a lie by looking at this video. On the other hand him even being in that building will lead to questions of why was in there and the defense saying that’s why he was chased
I knew that surveillance video was the difference. Those rednecks clung onto that shit with everything they had, and now, coupled with those BS police reports, and the glue of that shitty Southern Georgia Law OCGA 17-4-60, I can't see how they'll do any time once this gets to court.
It's gon be vigilante self defense that took a wrong turn.
Fucking fuckity fuck!
Hate to say it but I kinda agree with you, him even being in that building opens all kinds of doors for the defense at the trial
If his lawyers can get video showing other people coming into that building, hopefully the McMichaels included, then it will help him a lot
As well protected as jurisdictions and police departments are, I can’t imagine anything but open cases coming up against them. Shit how many cases come up against LA and NYPD? Countless. Nobody blinks.
Even through coercion, falsification of evidence, spoliation of evidence, police perjury, tampering, corruption, racial profiling and whatever else runs the gamut, they’ll be protected and covered up. But that ain’t even the concern right now.
Most important is getting these 3 CAC’s the death penalty.
They’re definitely gonna try and argue the case that he shouldn’t have been there and paint him in a horrible light, but whatever the case may be, the CAC’s knowingly lies from start to finish, and most recently, if true, about the prior surveillance which tosses everything else out the window.
There was no prior intent to “apprehend a suspicious subject previously seen” because the basis is flawed.
I don’t see what play they have left..
Also I got a feeling that cac that filmed it is gonna be the one that gets them convicted. He did a press conference and you can see he’s scared shitless and wants nothing to do with any of this NOW, he wasn’t just some random guy that just so happened to be filming what went on, he knows when it started, what went on during it and what all happened after the shooting. I can see him breaking and telling everything
Yup. I’m all for it. Like I posted earlier, if it takes letting him off, to get the other two so be it.
Even if Roddy gets off, he’ll be harassed for life as a free man ala George Zimmerman.
They only speak up when they can benefit.
Nothing will change until black people fight back!!
I knew that surveillance video was the difference. Those rednecks clung onto that shit with everything they had, and now, coupled with those BS police reports, and the glue of that shitty Southern Georgia Law OCGA 17-4-60, I can't see how they'll do any time once this gets to court.
It's gon be vigilante self defense that took a wrong turn.
Fucking fuckity fuck!
That video shows no burglary. These white people hate to take loss..
They took it down
Fuckin CACS .....
These cac is reaching.