Control of Virginia legislature could be determined by Chaturbate scandal: "Va. Dem. House candidate performed sex online with husband for tips"

The Catcher In The Rye

Rye-sing Star
Registered
"Theirs is one of just a handful of contests in each chamber expected to determine control of the legislature and whether Gov. Glenn Youngkin (R) can enact a conservative political agenda that includes banning abortion after 15 weeks, with some exceptions. The outcome on Election Day also could boost or dim Youngkin’s prospects as a potential last-minute candidate for the GOP presidential nomination."

Crazy that this could influence people's abortion rights or the next presidential election...

Va. Dem. House candidate performed sex online with husband for tips​


A Democrat running for a crucial seat in Virginia’s House of Delegates performed sex acts with her husband for a live online audience and encouraged viewers to pay them with “tips” for specific requests, according to online videos viewed by The Washington Post.

Susanna Gibson, a nurse practitioner and mother of two young children running in a highly competitive suburban Richmond district, streamed sex acts on Chaturbate, a platform that says it takes its name from “the act of masturbating while chatting online.”

Chaturbate videos are streamed live on that site and are often archived on other publicly available sites. More than a dozen videos of the couple captured from the Chaturbate stream were archived on one of those sites — Recurbate — in September 2022, after she entered the race. The most recent were two videos archived on Sept. 30, 2022. It is unclear when the live stream occurred.

While still listed on Recurbate, those videos were no longer available for viewing as of Saturday, after a Republican operative alerted The Washington Post about them. But the videos remained live on another non-password-protected site, which The Post viewed. At least two other publicly available sites displayed explicit still photos from the videos, The Post confirmed.

Gibson, 40, can be seen in the videos soliciting “tips” for performing specific acts — in apparent violation of Chaturbate’s terms and conditions, which say: “Requesting or demanding specific acts for tips may result in a ban from the Platform for all parties involved.”

In at least two videos, she tells viewers she is “raising money for a good cause.”

In multiple videos, Gibson interrupts sex acts to type into a bedside computer. Speaking directly into the screen, she urges viewers to provide tips, which are paid through “tokens” purchased through the site. In at least two videos, she agrees to perform certain acts only in a “private room,” an arrangement that requires the viewer to pay more.

“I need, like, more tokens before I let him do that,” she responds to a request that they perform a certain act. “One token, no. More. Raising money for a good cause.”

Almost immediately, as tips apparently arrive, she says “thank you” five times and tells her husband she will agree to that act.

Gibson takes the lead in addressing viewers on videos viewed by The Post, but in one case her husband, an attorney, chimes in with, “C’mon, guys,” to echo her entreaties for tips.

In a written statement, Gibson called the exposure of the videos “an illegal invasion of my privacy designed to humiliate me and my family.”

“It won’t intimidate me and it won’t silence me,” she said. “My political opponents and their Republican allies have proven they’re willing to commit a sex crime to attack me and my family because there’s no line they won’t cross to silence women when they speak up.”

Daniel P. Watkins, a lawyer for Gibson, said disseminating the videos constitutes a violation of the state’s revenge porn law, which makes it a Class 1 misdemeanor to “maliciously” distribute nude or sexual images of another person with “intent to coerce, harass, or intimidate.”

“We are working closely with state and federal law enforcement,” Watkins said.

The Post typically does not identify victims of alleged sex crimes to protect their privacy. In this case, Gibson originally live-streamed these sexual acts on a site that was not password-protected. The couple had more than 5,700 followers there. Many of the videos remained available to the public on other unrestricted sites as of Saturday. Watkins said Gibson was not aware of, and had not authorized, the posting of Chaturbate material on other sites.


Asked why Gibson had a reasonable expectation of privacy on Chaturbate, Watkins pointed to a 2021 Virginia Court of Appeals ruling that found it was unlawful for a man to secretly record his girlfriend during a consensual sexual encounter even if he did not show the video to others.

In that case, Ronnie Lee Johnson v. Commonwealth of Virginia, the court found that consent to being seen is not the same as consent to being recorded, writing that there was a “stark distinction between an image existing only in someone’s memory … [and] a permanent file that may be shared or re-viewed indefinitely.”

Gibson faces Republican David Owen, a retired home builder, on Nov. 7, when all 140 seats in Virginia’s House and Senate will be on the ballot.

“Me and my team found out about this story today like everyone else,” Owen said in a written statement Monday afternoon, soon after The Post published an article about Gibson. “I’m sure this is a difficult time for Susanna and her family, and I’m remaining focused on my campaign.”

The Republican operative who alerted The Post to the videos denied any connection to the Owen campaign or other groups active in Virginia elections this year. The operative provided the information on the condition of anonymity to avoid being drawn into the controversy.

Corey D. Silverstein, a prominent adult entertainment industry lawyer, said there is nothing illegal about streaming sex acts online as long as the participants and viewers are consenting adults — even if they are paid to perform specific acts.

“There is absolutely no law that they are violating — none,” he said. “In this case, you have two adults who are engaging in consensual sex, and they’ve decided they want to broadcast that, and they’re doing so in exchange for tipping. There’s absolutely nothing illegal about it.”

“I think it’s fantastic you have someone running who has an open sex life. It’s actually very refreshing,” added Silverstein, who is based in Michigan but practices around the country and the world.

Gibson and Owen are both well financed and running with support from their parties’ senior leaders. They are vying for an open seat in the 57th House District — highly competitive territory that covers parts of Henrico and Goochland counties.

Theirs is one of just a handful of contests in each chamber expected to determine control of the legislature and whether Gov. Glenn Youngkin (R) can enact a conservative political agenda that includes banning abortion after 15 weeks, with some exceptions. The outcome on Election Day also could boost or dim Youngkin’s prospects as a potential last-minute candidate for the GOP presidential nomination.


gib.png

Saddled with a divided Capitol for the first half of his four-year term, Youngkin has been unable to enact the abortion ban, corporate tax cuts or other priorities. Virginia is the only Southern state that has not tightened abortion restrictions since June 2022, when the Supreme Court ruled that states could make their own decisions about the procedure.

Both chambers are up for grabs as Republicans defend their narrow majority in the House (49-46) and Democrats try to retain theirs in the Senate (22-18).


The state’s newly drawn political maps triggered a wave of retirements and created a host of open seats, including the one Gibson and Owen are seeking in a toss-up district. After Youngkin won it by three points in 2021, the district tilted ever-so-narrowly blue — 50 percent to 49 percent — in last year’s congressional midterms, according to an analysis by the nonpartisan Virginia Public Access Project.

Gibson has outraised Owen $377,000 to $340,000, but Gibson spent nearly $300,000 of her haul battling a fellow Democrat in the June 20 primary. She defeated Bob Shippee by double digits for the nomination but had just $77,000 on hand in the fundraising period that concluded June 30. Owen, who faced no primary opponent, had about $166,000 in cash at the end of that period.

Gibson’s two largest donors are the environmental group Clean Virginia Fund ($45,000) and the abortion rights outfit Emily’s List ($20,000). Her campaign website lists priorities that include preserving abortion rights, banning assault weapons, lowering the cost of living and protecting the environment.

Gibson said alerting the media to the videos is dirty politics — aimed at silencing “women when they speak up.”

“They are trying to silence me because they want to silence you, and I won’t let that happen,” her statement said. “My opponent and his allies know that the people of this district are on our side on the issues, so they’re stooping to the worst gutter politics. There’s too much at stake in this election and I’ll never stop fighting for our community.”


Gibson’s campaign website displays pictures of her smiling in a white lab coat and scrubs, a stethoscope over her shoulders. Other photos show her interacting with her husband and children over a meal and a board game.

The site says she has worked in the medical field for nearly 15 years in the greater Richmond area, including in geriatrics, home-based primary care, emergency medicine, internal medicine and obesity medicine. It also identifies Gibson as a graduate of the University of Virginia and Columbia University, a Virginia native and a resident of western Henrico for more than a decade.

 
Last edited:

The Catcher In The Rye

Rye-sing Star
Registered
The Washington Post's coverage was gentle...


A Democrat candidate for state Senate in Virginia appears to have been raising money for a “good cause” by performing graphic sex acts online, where she told viewers she liked “being choked” and said they could watch her urinate for the right price, according to material reviewed by The Daily Wire.

Susanna Gibson, who is running for a seat in the narrowly divided Virginia statehouse, was as recently as last year posting as “HotWifeExperience” on the website Chaturbate, where men could pay tokens to get her to perform specific sex acts. In one video recorded shortly after she launched her campaign last year, she sold anal sex, saying “I’ll let you f— me in the a– doggy style in a private room if someone wants to pay. That’s the deal.”

In another video, she appears to say that for the right price, viewers could watch her urinate. “Y’all can watch me pee if you tip me and some tokens,” she said. “Again, I’m raising money for a good cause.”

“I like being choked. I like being hit. I do,”
she said in one video posted exactly a year ago, on September 11, 2022. “You know what I think about when he f—s me is all of you watching me.”

“I just want a private room with somebody filming their c— so I can come looking at it, Jesus Christ,” she said. “Oh God I want to f—ing get railroaded by all of you.”

She said for 500 tokens, she would order room service in a hotel and cause the delivery person to see her naked, saying: “I’m definitely a slut… In order to leave the door cracked I need 500 tokens.”

Gibson said she has had sex with three men in one day, and “don’t tell my husband he was the third. I would say ethnically nonmonogamous but I guess that three in one day was not.”

“I’m raising money for a really good cause and it’s my birthday so give me more please because it’s my birthday night and yeah so then I f—ed him in his house for the first time and then later that night I f—ed my husband.”


In the videos, she appears to be filmed with her husband, lawyer John David Gibson, who ensured that the raunchiest acts were reserved for the biggest spendings, saying “no anal outside of private.”

She can be heard in the videos saying “he doesn’t like sharing” her with other men, with Gibson saying, “Sometimes I have to though. She makes me.”

Her husband gave $5,000 to her campaign around the time the videos were filmed, according to public filings in Virginia.

The Washington Post first reported the story on Monday afternoon, and The Daily Wire independently obtained the videos.

Gibson did not return a request for comment from The Daily Wire asking whether the “good cause” was her Senate campaign. But she appears to acknowledge to The Washington Post that the videos are authentic, claiming that they are “an illegal invasion of my privacy designed to humiliate me and my family.”

Though she posted the videos online for her nearly 6,000 followers on Chaturbate, she now claims it to be a “sex crime” to shed light on the existence of her account.

“My political opponents and their Republican allies have proven they’re willing to commit a sex crime to attack me and my family because there’s no line they won’t cross to silence women when they speak up,” Gibson told the Washington Post.
 

keith6

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
"Theirs is one of just a handful of contests in each chamber expected to determine control of the legislature and whether Gov. Glenn Youngkin (R) can enact a conservative political agenda that includes banning abortion after 15 weeks, with some exceptions. The outcome on Election Day also could boost or dim Youngkin’s prospects as a potential last-minute candidate for the GOP presidential nomination."

Crazy that this could influence people's abortion rights or the next presidential election...

Va. Dem. House candidate performed sex online with husband for tips​


A Democrat running for a crucial seat in Virginia’s House of Delegates performed sex acts with her husband for a live online audience and encouraged viewers to pay them with “tips” for specific requests, according to online videos viewed by The Washington Post.

Susanna Gibson, a nurse practitioner and mother of two young children running in a highly competitive suburban Richmond district, streamed sex acts on Chaturbate, a platform that says it takes its name from “the act of masturbating while chatting online.”

Chaturbate videos are streamed live on that site and are often archived on other publicly available sites. More than a dozen videos of the couple captured from the Chaturbate stream were archived on one of those sites — Recurbate — in September 2022, after she entered the race. The most recent were two videos archived on Sept. 30, 2022. It is unclear when the live stream occurred.

While still listed on Recurbate, those videos were no longer available for viewing as of Saturday, after a Republican operative alerted The Washington Post about them. But the videos remained live on another non-password-protected site, which The Post viewed. At least two other publicly available sites displayed explicit still photos from the videos, The Post confirmed.

Gibson, 40, can be seen in the videos soliciting “tips” for performing specific acts — in apparent violation of Chaturbate’s terms and conditions, which say: “Requesting or demanding specific acts for tips may result in a ban from the Platform for all parties involved.”

In at least two videos, she tells viewers she is “raising money for a good cause.”

In multiple videos, Gibson interrupts sex acts to type into a bedside computer. Speaking directly into the screen, she urges viewers to provide tips, which are paid through “tokens” purchased through the site. In at least two videos, she agrees to perform certain acts only in a “private room,” an arrangement that requires the viewer to pay more.

“I need, like, more tokens before I let him do that,” she responds to a request that they perform a certain act. “One token, no. More. Raising money for a good cause.”

Almost immediately, as tips apparently arrive, she says “thank you” five times and tells her husband she will agree to that act.

Gibson takes the lead in addressing viewers on videos viewed by The Post, but in one case her husband, an attorney, chimes in with, “C’mon, guys,” to echo her entreaties for tips.

In a written statement, Gibson called the exposure of the videos “an illegal invasion of my privacy designed to humiliate me and my family.”

“It won’t intimidate me and it won’t silence me,” she said. “My political opponents and their Republican allies have proven they’re willing to commit a sex crime to attack me and my family because there’s no line they won’t cross to silence women when they speak up.”

Daniel P. Watkins, a lawyer for Gibson, said disseminating the videos constitutes a violation of the state’s revenge porn law, which makes it a Class 1 misdemeanor to “maliciously” distribute nude or sexual images of another person with “intent to coerce, harass, or intimidate.”

“We are working closely with state and federal law enforcement,” Watkins said.

The Post typically does not identify victims of alleged sex crimes to protect their privacy. In this case, Gibson originally live-streamed these sexual acts on a site that was not password-protected. The couple had more than 5,700 followers there. Many of the videos remained available to the public on other unrestricted sites as of Saturday. Watkins said Gibson was not aware of, and had not authorized, the posting of Chaturbate material on other sites.


Asked why Gibson had a reasonable expectation of privacy on Chaturbate, Watkins pointed to a 2021 Virginia Court of Appeals ruling that found it was unlawful for a man to secretly record his girlfriend during a consensual sexual encounter even if he did not show the video to others.

In that case, Ronnie Lee Johnson v. Commonwealth of Virginia, the court found that consent to being seen is not the same as consent to being recorded, writing that there was a “stark distinction between an image existing only in someone’s memory … [and] a permanent file that may be shared or re-viewed indefinitely.”

Gibson faces Republican David Owen, a retired home builder, on Nov. 7, when all 140 seats in Virginia’s House and Senate will be on the ballot.

“Me and my team found out about this story today like everyone else,” Owen said in a written statement Monday afternoon, soon after The Post published an article about Gibson. “I’m sure this is a difficult time for Susanna and her family, and I’m remaining focused on my campaign.”

The Republican operative who alerted The Post to the videos denied any connection to the Owen campaign or other groups active in Virginia elections this year. The operative provided the information on the condition of anonymity to avoid being drawn into the controversy.

Corey D. Silverstein, a prominent adult entertainment industry lawyer, said there is nothing illegal about streaming sex acts online as long as the participants and viewers are consenting adults — even if they are paid to perform specific acts.

“There is absolutely no law that they are violating — none,” he said. “In this case, you have two adults who are engaging in consensual sex, and they’ve decided they want to broadcast that, and they’re doing so in exchange for tipping. There’s absolutely nothing illegal about it.”

“I think it’s fantastic you have someone running who has an open sex life. It’s actually very refreshing,” added Silverstein, who is based in Michigan but practices around the country and the world.

Gibson and Owen are both well financed and running with support from their parties’ senior leaders. They are vying for an open seat in the 57th House District — highly competitive territory that covers parts of Henrico and Goochland counties.

Theirs is one of just a handful of contests in each chamber expected to determine control of the legislature and whether Gov. Glenn Youngkin (R) can enact a conservative political agenda that includes banning abortion after 15 weeks, with some exceptions. The outcome on Election Day also could boost or dim Youngkin’s prospects as a potential last-minute candidate for the GOP presidential nomination.


gib.png

Saddled with a divided Capitol for the first half of his four-year term, Youngkin has been unable to enact the abortion ban, corporate tax cuts or other priorities. Virginia is the only Southern state that has not tightened abortion restrictions since June 2022, when the Supreme Court ruled that states could make their own decisions about the procedure.

Both chambers are up for grabs as Republicans defend their narrow majority in the House (49-46) and Democrats try to retain theirs in the Senate (22-18).


The state’s newly drawn political maps triggered a wave of retirements and created a host of open seats, including the one Gibson and Owen are seeking in a toss-up district. After Youngkin won it by three points in 2021, the district tilted ever-so-narrowly blue — 50 percent to 49 percent — in last year’s congressional midterms, according to an analysis by the nonpartisan Virginia Public Access Project.

Gibson has outraised Owen $377,000 to $340,000, but Gibson spent nearly $300,000 of her haul battling a fellow Democrat in the June 20 primary. She defeated Bob Shippee by double digits for the nomination but had just $77,000 on hand in the fundraising period that concluded June 30. Owen, who faced no primary opponent, had about $166,000 in cash at the end of that period.

Gibson’s two largest donors are the environmental group Clean Virginia Fund ($45,000) and the abortion rights outfit Emily’s List ($20,000). Her campaign website lists priorities that include preserving abortion rights, banning assault weapons, lowering the cost of living and protecting the environment.

Gibson said alerting the media to the videos is dirty politics — aimed at silencing “women when they speak up.”

“They are trying to silence me because they want to silence you, and I won’t let that happen,” her statement said. “My opponent and his allies know that the people of this district are on our side on the issues, so they’re stooping to the worst gutter politics. There’s too much at stake in this election and I’ll never stop fighting for our community.”


Gibson’s campaign website displays pictures of her smiling in a white lab coat and scrubs, a stethoscope over her shoulders. Other photos show her interacting with her husband and children over a meal and a board game.

The site says she has worked in the medical field for nearly 15 years in the greater Richmond area, including in geriatrics, home-based primary care, emergency medicine, internal medicine and obesity medicine. It also identifies Gibson as a graduate of the University of Virginia and Columbia University, a Virginia native and a resident of western Henrico for more than a decade.

 

c_commander

Up and Coming Asshole
BGOL Investor
This is all. She sold sex with her husband online a few times. Meanwhile the rest of these muthafuckas sell their support on a daily basis like prostitutes on the corner. And that's ignoring the shit that we occasionally find out that these people do behind clothes doors that's usually worse than what she's done
 

knightmelodic

American fruit, Afrikan root.
BGOL Investor
hypocritical bastards. every single one of them had d/l and fapped multiple times to the vids

if she was a faux noise host mufuccas would be standing in line for an autograph

reichpublicans are really the lowest of the low
 

Dr. Truth

QUACK!
BGOL Investor
So why cant people mention an ex president currently running who paid a porn star 130k but it’s ok to attack a woman who has a webcam porn site? Explain why that hypocrisy can’t be mentioned please.
 

VAiz4hustlaz

Proud ADOS and not afraid to step to da mic!
BGOL Investor
So why cant people mention an ex president currently running who paid a porn star 130k but it’s ok to attack a woman who has a webcam porn site? Explain why that hypocrisy can’t be mentioned please.

Because it's indicative of her character and morals! Big difference between fucking on camera for money and a private exchange between two adults behind closed doors.
 

godofwine

Supreme Porn Poster - Ret
BGOL Investor
Love hot wives. Smashed one this weekend.

Funny how they clown her and not a word from GOP on abusers
 

The Catcher In The Rye

Rye-sing Star
Registered
So why cant people mention an ex president currently running who paid a porn star 130k but it’s ok to attack a woman who has a webcam porn site? Explain why that hypocrisy can’t be mentioned please.
Because it's indicative of her character and morals! Big difference between fucking on camera for money and a private exchange between two adults behind closed doors.

I actually have no issue with this woman being a political candidate and having done porn on Chaturbate and I think it is preposterous that such a trivial matter could impact voting rights, abortion rights, taxation and even impact the presidential election.

But here is why the Trump defense is lame and a waste of time:

#1- It is simply an ineffective argument. It only resonates with people who are already on your side and convinces nobody. I hate Trump but he got elected despite the "Grab 'em by the pussy" tapes and liberals need to accept that and move on. Crying over 2016 falls upon deaf ears. Ranting about the bad orange man only appeals to people who watch MSNBC.

#2- Justifying behavior by pointing to someone else's behavior, especially when you are not running against that person, is a pathetic distraction. "Costanza, you suck because you have multiple user names." "But Osama knocked down the towers!" Putting the Trump Derangement Syndrome aspect aside, it is way more persuasive and also more honest to just address the criticism directly.
 

hardawayz16

Rising Star
Registered
I actually have no issue with this woman being a political candidate and having done porn on Chaturbate and I think it is preposterous that such a trivial matter could impact voting rights, abortion rights, taxation and even impact the presidential election.

Preposterous? People typically LOSE jobs for what she did. But somehow she's still deserving of one of the most important jobs in her state. Because politics.
 

The Catcher In The Rye

Rye-sing Star
Registered
Preposterous? People typically LOSE jobs for what she did. But somehow she's still deserving of one of the most important jobs in her state. Because politics.

It isn't comparable to a normal job. If you work at Wal-Mart, the options are not only between two cashiers. In a general election, there are only two options.

It isn't about "deserving." It's about "better," for the constituents.


Though he’s previously explained to The Times-Dispatch that, while he supports capping most abortions at 15 weeks of gestation (with exception for rape, incest or when the pregnant person’s life is threatened), in the recording he notes that further restrictions might not be possible unless Republicans gain more seats in the legislature.​
In the recording, made surreptitiously by an abortion-rights activist at a campaign event in March, Owen said that he was going to have “conversations” with Sen. Siobhan Dunnavant, R-Henrico, about “what we can do when it comes to changing the laws we have.”​

 

VAiz4hustlaz

Proud ADOS and not afraid to step to da mic!
BGOL Investor
Preposterous? People typically LOSE jobs for what she did. But somehow she's still deserving of one of the most important jobs in her state. Because politics.

From a strategic perspective, he's right. She's running as VA House delegate, and that chamber of the VA General Assembly is currently 50/46 in favor of the GOP. Dems control the Senate, but a Republican (Youngkin) controls the Governorship. And he's like a baby DeSantis. So Dems need all the votes they can get to regain the balance the power.

She committed no crime. Technically, the crime was committed against her. So in the grand scheme of things from a Democratic perspective, it would be best to overlook the shit and support her.
 

Dr. Truth

QUACK!
BGOL Investor
I actually have no issue with this woman being a political candidate and having done porn on Chaturbate and I think it is preposterous that such a trivial matter could impact voting rights, abortion rights, taxation and even impact the presidential election.

But here is why the Trump defense is lame and a waste of time:

#1- It is simply an ineffective argument. It only resonates with people who are already on your side and convinces nobody. I hate Trump but he got elected despite the "Grab 'em by the pussy" tapes and liberals need to accept that and move on. Crying over 2016 falls upon deaf ears. Ranting about the bad orange man only appeals to people who watch MSNBC.

#2- Justifying behavior by pointing to someone else's behavior, especially when you are not running against that person, is a pathetic distraction. "Costanza, you suck because you have multiple user names." "But Osama knocked down the towers!" Putting the Trump Derangement Syndrome aspect aside, it is way more persuasive and also more honest to just address the criticism directly.
Wrong. If you’re going to complain about what she’s doing and you’re a Republikkklan who said Zero about Trump who illegally paid for prostitution with campaign money you need to be called out for your hypocrisy. Has nothing to do with “your side”. If Joe Biden was talking shit about Ted Cruz’s drug addict whore wife and said nothing about his son I’d call him out too.

None of those Republikkklan faggots said a fucking word about their cult master and his bullshit. But somehow this is worse? FOH
 
Top