Control of Virginia legislature could be determined by Chaturbate scandal: "Va. Dem. House candidate performed sex online with husband for tips"

pookie

Thinking of a Master Plan
BGOL Patreon Investor

:lol: :lol:its still the same though, the women have what's called a tip menu where you tip to see a certain sex act and the viewers also will tip and tell the woman what she wants them to do, Chaturbate must been in trouble before about something to even make that a rule. Dudes and women ruined most stripclubs but used to be most stripclubs had it big signs soon as you walked in saying “NO TOUCHING“ but they just used that to try and cover themselves if/when the police raided them and say it was the customer and stripper fault because they didn't follow the rules
She had to know this would get out :smh:

This kinda goes back to that site a few years ago who told the women their videos would only be sold in some sex shop in Australia, on most of those camsites the performer can block a region of viewers so their cam won't even show up on the site of viewers that's in that blocked region so they feel safe but there are multiple sites/people that record these camsites and either upload them for free on a site or go back and sell the recorded vids on their site, this is what happened in her case someone uploaded her Charurbate vids to a paid site called Recurbate
 

phanatic

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
I don't understand the problem. It's capitalism. No one in society was harmed by those videos she made. Can't cheer on capitalism while a company lays off 1000 employees to keep revenue steady, but suddenly find some moral ground when a lady and her husband are getting paid to fuck on camera. They bring joy to people, while that former employee is sitting at home wondering how they're going to pay rent.
 

Camille

Kitchen Wench #TeamQuaid
Staff member
She's a nurse practitioner with degrees from UVA and Columbia, and her husband is a well-known lawyer in Richmond. They were hardly trying to "make ends meet." I don't knock the hustle, but please don't try to sell this as a working-class sob story. :smh:

Most people, regardless of income, are living paycheck to paycheck.

That's my story, and I'm sticking to it.
 

Aww Skeet Skeet!

The antithesis of nonsense.
BGOL Investor
#2- Justifying behavior by pointing to someone else's behavior, especially when you are not running against that person, is a pathetic distraction. "Costanza, you suck because you have multiple user names." "But Osama knocked down the towers!" Putting the Trump Derangement Syndrome aspect aside, it is way more persuasive and also more honest to just address the criticism directly.

*Hunter Biden has entered the chat*
 

Camille

Kitchen Wench #TeamQuaid
Staff member
So you mean most people with money spend what they have and live beyond their means?

60% of Americans on average.

________

The share of high-income consumers, or those earning more than $100,000 annually, living paycheck to paycheck rose 1 percentage point year-over-year to 44% this year, the survey revealed. Of consumers earning between $50,000 to $100,000 annually, 65% lived paycheck to paycheck as of July 2023, compared to 63% a year ago. Low-income consumers, or those earning less than $50,000 annually, living paycheck to paycheck increased from 74% in July 2022 to 78% in July 2023.

Among high-income consumers, 13% struggle to pay monthly bills, up sharply from 8.8% in July 2022, according to the survey. Some 34% of low-income consumers struggle to pay bills, an increase from 31% a year ago.

At 26%, high-income consumers are the income bracket most likely to cite nonessential spending as a reason they live paycheck to paycheck, compared to 17% of low-income consumers

 

phanatic

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
She's a nurse practitioner with degrees from UVA and Columbia, and her husband is a well-known lawyer in Richmond. They were hardly trying to "make ends meet." I don't knock the hustle, but please don't try to sell this as a working-class sob story. :smh:
Some of these sex steamers make more than lawyers.
The couple probably has a voyeur kink, and it's safer to do online than having some stranger come over the house.
 

phanatic

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
Most people, regardless of income, are living paycheck to paycheck.

That's my story, and I'm sticking to it.
Didn't some lady just kill her kid because she was divorced and deep in debt, because she was trying to keep up appearances?
 

The Catcher In The Rye

Rye-sing Star
Registered
60% of Americans on average.

________

The share of high-income consumers, or those earning more than $100,000 annually, living paycheck to paycheck rose 1 percentage point year-over-year to 44% this year, the survey revealed. Of consumers earning between $50,000 to $100,000 annually, 65% lived paycheck to paycheck as of July 2023, compared to 63% a year ago. Low-income consumers, or those earning less than $50,000 annually, living paycheck to paycheck increased from 74% in July 2022 to 78% in July 2023.

Among high-income consumers, 13% struggle to pay monthly bills, up sharply from 8.8% in July 2022, according to the survey. Some 34% of low-income consumers struggle to pay bills, an increase from 31% a year ago.

At 26%, high-income consumers are the income bracket most likely to cite nonessential spending as a reason they live paycheck to paycheck, compared to 17% of low-income consumers


My point is that I have empathy for the poor and middle class but high-income consumers don't "struggle to pay," they are gluttonous and irresponsible.

At 26%, high-income consumers are the income bracket most likely to cite nonessential spending as a reason they live paycheck to paycheck

These people are moronic.

I have not been the smartest with money so I'm not casting stones without taking account for my own glass walls. (At first I said "these people are morons" but I kindly adjusted my statement to speak to their behavior.) But there is a huge difference between wasting money and struggling on a low income. It is not even the same conversation.
 

Camille

Kitchen Wench #TeamQuaid
Staff member
My point is that I have empathy for the poor and middle class but high-income consumers don't "struggle to pay," they are gluttonous and irresponsible.



These people are moronic.

I have not been the smartest with money so I'm not casting stones without taking account for my own glass walls. (At first I said "these people are morons" but I kindly adjusted my statement to speak to their behavior.) But there is a huge difference between wasting money and struggling on a low income. It is not even the same conversation.

If you didn't grow up in a home with good money management who also taught you good money management, chances are you are struggled at some point. We have adults here on BGOL who didn't attempt to get their credit and finances together until mid 40s or later, many making good money that you consider "no excuse". It's not something most schools teach.
 

The Catcher In The Rye

Rye-sing Star
Registered
If you didn't grow up in a home with good money management who also taught you good money management, chances are you are struggled at some point. We have adults here on BGOL who didn't attempt to get their credit and finances together until mid 40s or later, many making good money that you consider "no excuse". It's not something most schools teach.
Fair. Certainly some of those people grew up well off and are being irresponsible but you’re right that there are exceptions.
 

The Catcher In The Rye

Rye-sing Star
Registered
60% of Americans on average.

________

The share of high-income consumers, or those earning more than $100,000 annually, living paycheck to paycheck rose 1 percentage point year-over-year to 44% this year, the survey revealed. Of consumers earning between $50,000 to $100,000 annually, 65% lived paycheck to paycheck as of July 2023, compared to 63% a year ago. Low-income consumers, or those earning less than $50,000 annually, living paycheck to paycheck increased from 74% in July 2022 to 78% in July 2023.

Among high-income consumers, 13% struggle to pay monthly bills, up sharply from 8.8% in July 2022, according to the survey. Some 34% of low-income consumers struggle to pay bills, an increase from 31% a year ago.

At 26%, high-income consumers are the income bracket most likely to cite nonessential spending as a reason they live paycheck to paycheck, compared to 17% of low-income consumers

My point is that I have empathy for the poor and middle class but high-income consumers don't "struggle to pay," they are gluttonous and irresponsible.



These people are moronic.

I have not been the smartest with money so I'm not casting stones without taking account for my own glass walls. (At first I said "these people are morons" but I kindly adjusted my statement to speak to their behavior.) But there is a huge difference between wasting money and struggling on a low income. It is not even the same conversation.
If you didn't grow up in a home with good money management who also taught you good money management, chances are you are struggled at some point. We have adults here on BGOL who didn't attempt to get their credit and finances together until mid 40s or later, many making good money that you consider "no excuse". It's not something most schools teach.
Fair. Certainly some of those people grew up well off and are being irresponsible but you’re right that there are exceptions.

 

Costanza

Rising Star
Registered
Update:


Henrico House of Delegates candidate Susanna Gibson brought in nearly $490,000 in donations in September, the month news broke that she and her husband had live-streamed sex acts on a porn website.

Gibson’s fundraising ranked 12th among the candidates for the 100 House seats in September. But Gibson’s Republican opponent, David Owen — who ranked 11th — outraised her in September, bringing in nearly $565,000. Owen finished September with nearly $540,000 in cash on hand to nearly $379,000 for Gibson, according to new campaign finance reports published by the Virginia Public Access Project.

Four hotly contested Richmond-area races for the House of Delegates and state Senate continue to be among the highest draws for fundraising in the fight for control of the legislature that concludes on Election Day Nov. 7.











 

God-Of-War-420

Mr. Pool
God fucking damnit this countries political parties are full of swindlers, pimps, war mongers and whores. We need better options, this is ridiculous.

What a sad state of things.



Remember when this was enough to derail your political career?


He was just happy lmao
 

God-Of-War-420

Mr. Pool

Yes, true on all counts. These are the people fucking up our country, we deserve to know their character and what they truly stand for.

The Dems need better candidates, republicans have ones that represent them perfectly, white scumbag, hate filled, wife beating, minority hating, immigrant blaming hicks.

We get porn hoes and rich hypocrites who more represent two states who can barely hold their shit together and who's stench of homeless piss can be smelled from three states away. Candidates who care more about pronouns and cutting off kiddie Dicks then they do winning back important parts of government to block truly horrible laws that are being pushed through.

Onlyfans hoe is not the hill democrats should be dying on, fuck this skank I wouldn't want her delivering my groceries let alone making important political decisions.
 

Costanza

Rising Star
Registered

Biden and Harris endorsed a slate of Democrats running in races throughout Virginia in this year’s high-stakes elections, which will decide the balance of power in the General Assembly, including candidates running in competitive races in the Richmond area.

Here’s the full list of the Virginia Democrats endorsed by Biden and Harris:

Virginia House of Delegates

  • Del. Michele Maldonado (HD-20)
  • Joshua Thomas (HD-21)
  • Travis Nembhard (HD-22)
  • Atoosa Reaser (HD-27)
  • Marty Martinez (HD-29)
  • Amy Laufer (HD-55)
  • Del. Rodney Willett (HD-58)
  • Joshua Cole (HD-65)
  • Del. Shelly Simonds (HD-70)
  • Stephen Miller-Pitts (HD-75)
  • Kimberly Pope Adams (HD-82)
  • Nadarius Clark (HD-84)
  • Karen Jenkins (HD-89)
  • Phil Hernandez (HD-94)
  • Del. Kelly Fowler (HD-96)
  • Michael Feggans (HD-97)
Virginia Senate
  • Del. Schuyler VanValkenburg (SD-16)
  • Del. Clint Jenkins (SD-17)
  • Sen. Aaron Rouse (SD-22)
  • Sen. Monty Mason (SD-24)
  • Joel Griffin (SD-27)
  • Del. Danica Roem (SD-30)
  • Russet Perry (SD-31)
The last-minute endorsements from the most prominent figures in the party hope to give Democrats a boost in the state’s crucial elections – all 140 General Assembly seats are on the line, but only some districts are considered battlegrounds.
 

Politic Negro

Rising Star
BGOL Investor

Biden and Harris endorsed a slate of Democrats running in races throughout Virginia in this year’s high-stakes elections, which will decide the balance of power in the General Assembly, including candidates running in competitive races in the Richmond area.

Here’s the full list of the Virginia Democrats endorsed by Biden and Harris:

Virginia House of Delegates

  • Del. Michele Maldonado (HD-20)
  • Joshua Thomas (HD-21)
  • Travis Nembhard (HD-22)
  • Atoosa Reaser (HD-27)
  • Marty Martinez (HD-29)
  • Amy Laufer (HD-55)
  • Del. Rodney Willett (HD-58)
  • Joshua Cole (HD-65)
  • Del. Shelly Simonds (HD-70)
  • Stephen Miller-Pitts (HD-75)
  • Kimberly Pope Adams (HD-82)
  • Nadarius Clark (HD-84)
  • Karen Jenkins (HD-89)
  • Phil Hernandez (HD-94)
  • Del. Kelly Fowler (HD-96)
  • Michael Feggans (HD-97)
Virginia Senate
  • Del. Schuyler VanValkenburg (SD-16)
  • Del. Clint Jenkins (SD-17)
  • Sen. Aaron Rouse (SD-22)
  • Sen. Monty Mason (SD-24)
  • Joel Griffin (SD-27)
  • Del. Danica Roem (SD-30)
  • Russet Perry (SD-31)
The last-minute endorsements from the most prominent figures in the party hope to give Democrats a boost in the state’s crucial elections – all 140 General Assembly seats are on the line, but only some districts are considered battlegrounds.
So who won off that list?
 
Top