I give up, you've convinced me, Madrimov was badly hurt and only survived because he held on for dear life. You realize Crawford had a mouse under his eye too.
Deontay Wilder/Tyson Fury Official
- Thread starter Rollie_Fingaz
- Start date
I don't think you paid attention to the announcers and I'm beginning to question, did you even see the fight? Oh and as for Porter he predicted a Crawford win, now did Crawford win or lose? Answer that.
You started the boxing broadcast looking for an argument about the anthems and you're still arguing about something different...lol.
I just asked a simple question, when Porter scored the fight 8-1 was he lying or was he calling the fight as he saw it? You can disagree all you want but the announcers scored the fight the way they saw it. Did any of them score the fight for Madrimov at the end?
I see you trying to parse hairs. There are no hairs to parse, Porter called the fight as a Crawford win while the other announcers didn't. End of story.
No one was looking for an argument, dude asked when did they start playing anthems before the main event. That's something that has always been done.
How about this, will you concede the fight was closer than what Porter thought?
& he told you that's he has been to fights before so he understood the anthem before the main event; you didn't listen to him. He was talking about the three anthems they played before the main event, but you really didn't want to understand what he was saying. You were looking for disagreement and you were looking to educate him.
That's madness, I was talking about the other announcers and not Porter and I later told you that.
It's like this Tweet:
and
this one:
Stop changing the subject; I'm not the one who had the discussion with you about the anthems. You are getting me confused with someone else. I was only referencing your anthem conversation with that person.
More complaints about the biased announcers except Porter:
See post #7,573
Was the fight close or not?More complaints about the biased announcers except Porter:
"A red herring fallacy is a form of logical fallacy or reasoning error that occurs when a misleading argument or question is presented to distract from the main issue or argument at hand. Red herring refers to the piece of information that is used as a diversion."
More complaints:
Last edited:
An impressive win over Fundora by Spence changes his mind. Charlo, Ennis, or Spence ( if he looks good ) are the only interesting fights left for Crawford. Public interest in an Alvarez fight fell off a cliff.