No, why would I?
Is anyone on here REALLY voting for Kamala ? Why should I vote for Kamala?
- Thread starter Slowhands
- Start date
We got some property but the white folks took the money
But since you are talking about Kamala Harris, show me documented proof of either side getting both from white slave owners.
That doesn;t matter, ignore all the issues, ignore everything Trump has said and done and lets focus on where are Kamala's black cousins.
We had trump as president for four years...did you survive?
Some random person you evidently thought was masquerading as the rapper Nas! And Kamala isn't "Black" and you said you don't care anyway! So who's the idiot here?
As I said, go back to posting rape fantasies.
so what is the point of the complaining if you are not going to act on it?
You are confusing me someone else, never said I was leaving the country or anything like that if Trump won.
Anthony Johnson (colonist) - Wikipedia
So your logic is I should leave the country if the candidate I voted for loses?
When I ask people this same question, they act like they don’t remember this occurred.
Trump is nothing but a liberal media creation that is all talk, little action.
I don't think you are a idiot, I think you are a fucking idiot if you are basing your decisions on whether Kamala has black cousins.
Or we never got it in the first place. And as far as Kamala, have you read what her father said about his family?
I don't think you are a idiot, I think you are a fucking idiot if you are basing your decisions on whether Kamala has black cousins.
I'm basing my decisions on someone I regard as a charlatan - a fake - someone being marketed as "Black" solely to garner the support of a core electorate she doesn't do anything for.
Just as, for example, many people see Trump as a "fake businessman" who markets hiimself as a successful billionaire even though he's files numerous bankruptcies.
Do you get it now?
She markets her self as black and South Asian, the only ones focused on her blackness are Republicans trying to sow discord which is clearly working.
I don't think you are a idiot, I think you are a fucking idiot if you are basing your decisions on whether Kamala has black cousins.
that is no dumber than voting for her to spite white people as a previous poster suggested
Not one person in this thread said they were doing that.
Ok. Why dont you quote the whole post and tell me what you think of what he said?
Not on your watch though right?You know how mad the white men will be if a black woman becomes president!!!!!
Also, there are people voting for Harris because they lust after her.
The spam thread started by @DNC_Dunce has posters talking about how much they want to fuck.
These same posters call for someone to get banned for calling Harris a ho
So can you think of no other reason someone would vote for Kamala other than her pretending to be black and that they find her attractive?Also, there are people voting for Harris because they lust after her.
The spam thread started by @DNC_Dunce has posters talking about how much they want to fuck.
These same posters call for someone to get banned for calling Harris a ho
Yes, they are a feminist, immigrant and/or LGBT club member.
Border crossing is the lowest its been since 2020 and dems did try to pass a strict immigration bill.
So women rights and not controlling who people can marry is affecting your daily life?
In fairness to the bolded and underlined above, there is a nostalgia harkening back to the old days of BGOL in those posters’ responses…..Also, there are people voting for Harris because they lust after her.
The spam thread started by @DNC_Dunce has posters talking about how much they want to fuck.
These same posters call for someone to get banned for calling Harris a ho
wOW, just like the LA Times.
No Kamala.
Is Washington Post owned by a Billionaire too?
WaPo is owned by Jeff Bezos, so you better cancel that Amazon Prime subscription and get back to waiting 5 to 7 days for your delivery!
OK..................
You know how mad the white men will be if a black woman becomes president!!!!!
Basically!
For these niggas, that would be like snatching the pipe right out of the crackhead’s hand.
OK..................
Basically!
Bruh is the queen of pointless yet sassy clapbacks
Might as well add these politics as wellThere’s One Main Culprit if Donald Trump Wins
Oct. 22, 2024
By Bret Stephens
Opinion Columnist
The Electoral College. White racism. Black sexism. President Biden.
Should Kamala Harris lose the presidential election next month, those will be among the more convenient excuses Democrats will offer for falling short in a race against a staggeringly flawed, widely detested opponent. There will also be whispers that she was not the strongest candidate in the first place — that the party would have done better to elevate a more natural political talent like Josh Shapiro of Pennsylvania or Gretchen Whitmer of Michigan.
There’s truth in all of it. But it lets off the hook the main culprit: the way in which leading liberal voices in government, academia and media practice politics today. Consider its main components.
The politics of condescension, typified by Barack Obama’s suggestion this month that Black men might be reluctant to vote for Harris because they “just aren’t feeling the idea of having a woman as president.” But perhaps those men are responding to something more mundane: Median weekly wages for full-time Black workers rose steeply during Donald Trump’s presidency and essentially stagnated under Biden, according to data from the St. Louis Fed. Why reach for the insulting explanation when a rational one will do?
The politics of name-calling, which happens every time Trump’s voters are told they are racists, misogynists, weird, phobic, low-information or, most recently, supporters of a fascist — and, by implication, fascists themselves. Aside from being gratuitous and self-defeating — what kind of voter is going to be won over by being called a name? — it’s also mostly wrong. Trump’s supporters overwhelmingly are people who think the Biden-Harris years have been bad for them and the country. Maybe liberals should try to engage the argument without belittling the person.
The politics of gaslighting, exemplified by all the MSNBC talking heads who repeatedly vouched for Biden’s mental acuity, when, as Representative Dean Phillips of Minnesota has acknowledged, the president’s decline has been obvious for years. Now some of the same pundits are extolling Harris as brilliant and experienced, which may be true but is hardly evidenced by her seeming inability to move beyond a limited set of talking points or the fact that it’s difficult to think of a political or legislative accomplishment of which she was the prime mover.
The politics of highhandedness. Do liberals really believe there are no lingering resentments over the fact that Harris secured her nomination through the immediate endorsement of party grandees without winning a single primary or facing a single challenger? Most Democrats seem fine with it, but this is a race in which the votes of skeptical independents may count more than ever. A Democratic Party that claims to be defending democracy without bothering to practice it is not going to endear itself to voters it needs to win.
The politics of Pollyanna, brought to you by the things-have-never-been-better crowd. They are the people who told us that inflation was (a) good for you, (b) transitory or (c) over and forgotten or who think a lower rate of inflation somehow relieves the legacy of higher prices and interest rates. They are the people who argued there was no immigration crisis and then crowed that it was safely behind us. They are the ones who insist crime is under control while ignoring the fact that people’s sense of everyday safety keeps getting worse, thanks to skyrocketing rates of car theft, shoplifting, open-air drug use, public defecation and other quality-of-life crimes. Wouldn’t it be better to meet voter concerns rather than tell them they’re seeing ghosts?
The politics of selective fidelity to traditional norms. Liberals fear, with reason, the threat Trump poses to the institutional architecture of American government. Yet many of the same Democrats want to pack the Supreme Court, eliminate the Senate filibuster, get rid of the Electoral College, give federal agencies the right to impose eviction moratoriums and forgive hundreds of billions of dollars in student debt without the consent of Congress. They decry Trump’s assaults on the news media while cheering the Biden administration’s attempt to strong-arm media companies into censoring opinions it disliked. And they warn of Trump’s efforts to criminalize his political opponents, even as they celebrate criminalizing him. Hypocrisy of this sort doesn’t go unnoticed by people not fully in the tank for Harris.
The politics of identity over class. Harris began her presidential campaign by consciously and correctly leaning away from the type of identity politics that has obsessed Democrats for too long. But as soon as she realized her approval among Black men was alarmingly soft, she rolled out a financial giveaway plan exclusively geared for them.
It remains perfectly possible that Harris will win the election, in which case we will hear a great deal about the brightness of her appeal and the brilliance of her campaign. Wiser liberals might want to press two questions: How did Trump still get so very, very close? And how can we fashion a liberalism that doesn’t turn so many ordinary people off?
Opinion | There’s One Main Culprit if Donald Trump Wins
They should look at themselves and the way they practice politics.www.nytimes.com
