San Francisco Black DA fires staff
- Thread starter Supersav
- Start date
I remember during this MFs hearing back in the day our people were behind him getting in and said the Cacs were against a black man being on The Supreme Courts wonder how those same people feel now.
I can’t stand this coons faceI remember during this MFs hearing back in the day our people were behind him getting in and said the Cacs were against a black man being on The Supreme Courts wonder how those same people feel now.
Depends on the state.
In many states, the only grounds for wrongful termination is an "ism"
racism
sexism
ageism
ect
ect
etc
True.
I think the direction they went in was libel. Because the letter was an official part of her publicly accessible record and she (her lawyer) argued that the published false allegation ruined her reputation and was preventing her from gaining employment.
London Breed is beating the progressives. But is she actually fixing anything?
The San Francisco mayor has outflanked her progressive opponents but now she has no one to blame for the city’s persistent problems with crime and homelessness.
www.politico.com
What did she do?
What they all refuse to admit, especially BKF. Ask him about Obama's bank bailout.
The worst part about this thread is that the pro-whites are still lying which shows malicious intent. Now the tactic is “fake Twitter sources” (although these are people that were fired and are giving first hand accounts) and the new DA is getting co-signed by Sean Hannity. The line of thinking “blue = good”, “red = bad” is the mindset of someone that is lost. This is a battle that the pro-whites can’t win but they are still trying to defend the indefensible while claiming to be “pro-black”. They just want to feel good despite the cost or the repercussions because they are libertines that have one goal and that is acceptance by the so-called white man, which they will never get anyway because they don’t respect cowards
Blue MAGA!
London Breed is beating the progressives. But is she actually fixing anything?
The San Francisco mayor has outflanked her progressive opponents but now she has no one to blame for the city’s persistent problems with crime and homelessness.
Of course not.
District Attorney Brooke Jenkins under fire for six-figure disclosure
San Francisco District Attorney Brooke Jenkins has been in the hot seat this week following an income disclosure showing that she received over $100,000 from a nonprofit linked to the effort to recall her predecessor, Chesa Boudin.
Why it matters: The recent revelations raise ethical concerns around whether Jenkins intentionally misled the public about her role in the recall.
What's next: The San Francisco Ethics Commission could launch an investigation to determine whether Jenkins broke any laws, either at its own discretion or in response to someone filing a complaint. City law, however, prevents the commission from disclosing information about complaints or ongoing investigations, the commission told Axios.
San Francisco District Attorney Brooke Jenkins has been in the hot seat this week following an income disclosure showing that she received over $100,000 from a nonprofit linked to the effort to recall her predecessor, Chesa Boudin.
Why it matters: The recent revelations raise ethical concerns around whether Jenkins intentionally misled the public about her role in the recall.
- Jenkins, who was appointed to the position in July and is up for election in November, had previously said she volunteered for the recall efforts.
- These disclosures could make it difficult for her to garner enough support to win in November.
- A group with a similar name, Neighbors for a Better San Francisco Advocacy, spent millions of dollars to support Boudin's recall.
- The organizations are legally separate entities, but share wealthy hedge fund manager William Oberndorf as a board member. Oberndorf was one of the biggest donors to the group backing the recall efforts.
- She added: "My work for the nonprofit organization focused on public safety … and other legal work supporting communities ranging from formerly incarcerated women to helping advise the business community on public safety concerns and issues."
What's next: The San Francisco Ethics Commission could launch an investigation to determine whether Jenkins broke any laws, either at its own discretion or in response to someone filing a complaint. City law, however, prevents the commission from disclosing information about complaints or ongoing investigations, the commission told Axios.
- If the commission were to launch an investigation, it's unclear whether the matter would be resolved by the election in November.
- Jenkins will likely be up against two former San Francisco police commissioners: Joe Alioto Veronese, the grandson of former SF Mayor Joseph Alioto, and John Hamasaki. Both filed their paperwork to run for the position this month.
BLACK PEOPLE KILLED BY POLICE!!! LINKS TO THREADS INSIDE.
Black '1870' pins to be worn by Congress members for State of the Union have deep significance Members of the Congressional Black Caucus will be wearing black pins with the number “1870” on them, which marks the year of the first known police killing of an unarmed and free Black person that...
www.bgol.us
Credit @arnoldwsimmons
here we go with that bullshit. We black folks got some shit with us that we need to deal with and stop blaming whitey for our own fuckery!! You may not be a fan of crooked ass cops (i'm not) but not all cops are crooked and the same non crooked ass cops I need them to lock up them crooked ass black folks.. not the non-crooked ass black folks.. just the ones that be on that bullshit!
Similar threads
