Ya'll are wasting your time talking to Cranrab about Stringer. He hates Stringer, I think at some point a dude that looks lik esStringer must have fukked him and he can no longer have a proper perspective of that character.
And that wasn't rocket-science either,it was only a matter of time everyone knew the pay phones were tapped.
I think that would be everyone's first reaction,espacially when it comes to money but in the end I beleive Avon was ok with the way things went and turned out because with the shuffling of things it showed who was & wasn't built for the game,who was loyal & disloyal and who needed "X'ed" out.
Taking Marlo out would have put the spot-light back on him at the time him nor his organization needed that heat back on him.
Even if "Dee" was on the fence of breaking down,it wasn't Stringer Bell's call to make the decision to have Dee killed.Not at that point in the game and not without talking to your right-hand man who happens to his uncle.Im sad that Dee was murder because I beleive he would have came out of prison a better man but on the flipside of that Im happy Stringer ordered the hit because it showed Avon that he couldn't be trusted.Remember Avon told him several times,"Don't worry about it, I'll handle him".
He was still too young for anyone to conclude what type of chararistics who would take after.Kenard to me was just some bad-ass kid doing bad ass adult things.Besides they didn't give any background or history on him because he was just one of the bunch of youngings coming up of age in B-more.
That wasn't that gangsta,he knew exactly who he was dealing with,as if he had done it many times before-hand.Gangsta,no,theif,yes and remember they booted him out of office and if he was so gangsta he still would have been there.
Now he had some issue's,the rest of them just didn't have a conscious nor care in the world.
honestly, i didn't dismiss it at all.
i chose not to respond because i think you don't comprehend how that scene works AGAINST your point and not in favor of it.
you don't see that scene as avon MOCKING stringer?
you don't see avon DISTANCING himself from stringer in that scene?
you focus on the use of the word "we", but what is so special about that? they were boys. for years they considered one another family. they grew up together, so why not speak in terms of "we"?
this "we" argument is so flimsy that i will explode it in the next sentences.
what farewell remark did avon use with stringer after avon obtained the information he needed for brother mouzone to execute stringer? was that an utterance of solidarity?
in fact, throughout that tremendous balcony scene (which you have purposely avoided) what happened to "we"? it was all "i", "me", "you".
dudes like stringer bell don't even appear on my radar. people like yourself seem to get plenty captivated by him though. wonder why?
and for the record, i don't hate stringer bell. i'm just able to clearly see him for what he was. a bumbling mark.
since you've chosen to enter the discussion, why not refute me? after all, it should be simple to offer up a few examples of how stringer bell propelled the barksdale organization forward, correct?
go ahead, stringer jr. talk is cheap.
honestly, i didn't dismiss it at all.
i chose not to respond because i think you don't comprehend how that scene works AGAINST your point and not in favor of it.
you don't see that scene as avon MOCKING stringer?
you don't see avon DISTANCING himself from stringer in that scene?
you focus on the use of the word "we", but what is so special about that? they were boys. for years they considered one another family. they grew up together, so why not speak in terms of "we"?
this "we" argument is so flimsy that i will explode it in the next sentences.
what farewell remark did avon use with stringer after avon obtained the information he needed for brother mouzone to execute stringer? was that an utterance of solidarity?
in fact, throughout that tremendous balcony scene (which you have purposely avoided) what happened to "we"? it was all "i", "me", "you".
You don't even get the SIGNIFICANCE of that scene ... that was on some godfather/julius cesar/shakespeare works right there... both of them were pretending to like the other with malice in their hearts and a knife behind their backs .... and it was mostly "we\ this and that" and ended on them toasting to "us"
are you really are misunderstanding all this or just trying to be difficult??
string was the #2 ... without the other they couldn't make it ... only reason avon was getting shine cause it was a street gang if they went corporate avon would have been the #2 and string would have been the #1 gangster ... this is also part of the the reason Avon wanted to stay in the street ... the wire is DEEP homie![]()
You don't even get the SIGNIFICANCE of that scene ... that was on some godfather/julius cesar/shakespeare works right there... both of them were pretending to like the other with malice in their hearts and a knife behind their backs
string was the #2 ... without the other they couldn't make it ... only reason avon was getting shine cause it was a street gang if they went corporate avon would have been the #2 and string would have been the #1 gangster ... this is also part of the the reason Avon wanted to stay in the street .
Yeah, I'm seeing now that you do have an agenda AGAINST Stringer, the fact that Avon WAS distancing himself IS THE POINT!!!
WHY DIDN'T HE SAY ANYTHING THEN???
ANYTHING, JUST ONE WORD???
Once again, nowhere is it even implied that he was a hanger on
a catalyst was added...the destruction of the Towers.
Avon even said himself, "I ain't no suit wearin' businessman like you, I'm just a gangsta I suppose!"
Cran refuses to hear what his ears tell him, I'll just have to agree to disagree.
Dude, you compared STringer to Fredo Corleone! There is no reasoning with you!
Nah... Omar had a code. Kenard would've thought having a code makes you soft. In the prequels where they showed Omar as a youngin, he refused to take the working man's money. Kenard wouldn't have gave two shits about that.
nothing like Kenard at all
an agenda? really?
DJM, the above quote are examples of argumentum ad ignorantiam.
correct. it didn't have to be implied, because the overt actions WERE depicted on the screen. avon gave stringer opportunity after opportunity to make good, but stringer FAILED at every turn.
examples:
stringer stupidly instructing them to go after the money during the hit on orlando
stringer stupidly greenlighting the hit on omar with his grandmother on sunday
stringer stupidly disobeying avon's wishes and giving up locations to prop joe
stringer stupidly trying to pit omar against brother mouzone
stringer stupidly acting independently to have d'angelo murdered (even though killing d'angelo can be seen as the correct move, doing it behind his partner's back was wrong)
these are NUMEROUS (and there are plenty more) examples of stringer as the bumbling stooge working AGAINST the barksdale organization. where are the examples of stringer propelling the barksdale organization forward?
crickets. oh that's right, but i have an agenda though.![]()
yes, and an excellent topic to mention.
because it was the loss of the towers that dramatically emphasized the difference in strategies.
and we know from the show whose strategy was PROVEN better (avon's, by way of marlo), and whose was an EPIC failure (stringer's).
and that statement flies in the face of your "we" evidence.
in the scene you posted, a MOCKING avon was clearly demarcating their differences. not so much a "we".
avon was exasperated by stringer's string (no pun intended) of failures (conversation with the developers) and incompetence (inability to follow orders when tasked to deal with marlo), and it showed.
the only thing i refuse to hear are statements that are CONTRARY to what actually was depicted and related in the narrative.
we can agree to disagree.
but 1 thing is certain as a result of this thread and resultant discussions about stringer bell.
i now know and completely understand why DA DON was so successful in duping so many BGOL residents. those same people are apparently easily duped by status and perceived power, and it blinds them to an obvious lack of substance.
ALL of these actions were in the present, your point was he was a coat-tail rider, as I said before he was an advisor, NOT A LEADER which is why he made stupid mistakes when left to his own devices.
The fact that he is/was an advisor is shown throughout, and never, ever disputed.
And the proof of moving the Barksdale organization forward?
B&B (Barksdale & Bell) Condominiums.
Which would have taken them OUT of the drug trade and turned them into legit businessmen.
what Stringer was trying to show Avon was that they had moved beyond the street corners, beyond having to kill, beyond having to worry about going to jail, in this sense Avon and Marlo were the same, they were BOTH about the streets, Stringer wanted better, it was THIS that led him to make the stupid mistakes that he did, these were mistakes fueled by him wanting to get out PERIOD.
What you are missing about Stringer's character is that he was showing growth, you saw this in D'Angelo and in Cutty as well.
Stringer wanted out of the day-to-day for BOTH of them, notice that he set Avon up in the apartment with a truck in his name as well as real estate.
This was so BOTH could live the dream, but Avon was STILL about the streets, he didn't want to be a businessman, just like Marlo.
You are STILL referring to the present in which BOTH are now @ the top and are now headed in different directions, your assertion was that Stringer WAS NOT THERE, he was merely a hanger on during Avon's come-up
Remember also that Brianna came to talk to both of them about McNulty coming to see her, this is when Avon slipped and left Brianna believing that he had something to do with "D's" death.
the comparisons are STRONG and VALID.
stringer bell was in the mix because he was there. not because he was competent or efficient, but simply because he was there, and he was boys with avon. same with fredo. he was in the mix because he shared the same last name. never demonstrated any acumen for the game.
if you object to that statement, then produce some evidence in the form of actions (engineered by stringer) that propelled the barksdale organization forward.
stringer bell betrayed avon in a selfish effort to further his own stupid agenda. fredo sold out michael too.
if you object to that statement, then produce some evidence that refutes it.
was stringer shrewd or intelligent enough to be michael? HELL no.
was stringer man enough to be santino? HELL no. (could you imagine santino getting hemmed up by donette like stringer did?)
was stringer knowledgeable or experienced enough to be tom hagen?![]()
Stringer was shrud enough to grow the business while von was in jail, did he not?
He had the nigga set up in a condo and a Navigator in his own name
because "they were making so much straight money that they could carry shyt like that in the open" Remember Stringer saying that? They were what Freemon and McNultry feard... THE BANK!
But Avon was too short sighted to see it. All he had to do was post up and let the money continue to flow but he wanted to fight over some corners that didn't matter.
You say that Stringer wasn't ruthless enough to be Michael. NIETHER WAS AVON!! MICHAEL KILLED IS BROTHER, AVON COULDN'T/WOULDN'T DO HIS OWN NEPHEW WHO WAS WEAK AND HE KNEW!
I know that some guy that looked like Stringer must have fukked you or beat you up as a kid and it made you hate his character to the point you want him to be the most incompetant dude on the show but he wasn't.
Avon on the other hand left his boy, childhood friend, to get got by his arch enemy, the man who stole from him and a dude from out of town. If he was really a baller and ruthless he would have turned that shyt around and got both of them instead of letting his boy get got.
um, no, stringer bell did not grow the business. stringer bell undermined the barksdale organization while avon was in jail. and not coincidentally, stringer bell also set in motion the deeds that would ultimately lead to his own demise at the hands of brother mouzone (and omar).
something which avon avoided HIS ENTIRE LIFE (purposely didn't have a driver license, had a picture removed from county records), stringer bell was stupid enough to do: create a paper trail on avon barksdale.
you dudes that fall for the flash make me laugh every time: listing a DEMERIT as a CREDIT.
at a condo and a navigator.
you cats that fall for fiction are funny. you and the other stringer bells are the simps that fall for the MLM mumbo-jumbo.
look up "unexplained wealth". IRS doesn't make cases based off that? FBI doesn't investigate criminal structuring? citing this only demonstrates your (and stringer bell's) ignorance of how the game works at high levels.
lester freamon was anxious to shut down the barksdale organization before it took another step up the ladder because then it would be outside BPD jurisdiction, NOT because the barksdale organization would've been untouchable to all law enforcement.
you drank ALL the kool-aid. think on it a minute. you are fully endorsing a plan outlined by an moron. his flash (suits, money, automobiles) has persuaded you IN SPITE OF his demonstrated incompetence and numerous failures.
stringer bell got sold a bill of goods by the developers and clay davis, and thought that it would make him more wealthy off easy money. sound like the same shit the MLM people offer, don't it?
and just like the MLM indoctrinated, when you call them on it, they resort to sophistry because their actual FACT based knowledge of how the plan works is nil.
@ you being too obtuse to see the difference.
FACT: michael killed fredo because fredo fingered him for assassination.
FACT: d'angelo never fingered avon for assassination.
FACT: d'angelo never even officially rolled on avon.
FACT: stringer bell greenlighted d'angelo because he was a nervous bitch who allowed his emotions to dominate his actions.
oh, OK. then let's see.
i know that some guy that looks like stringer bell must be your current boyfriend and that's why you want to cape up for him IN SPITE OF the numerous valid examples i have provided which demonstrate his numerous flaws.
right. you just put yourself on an island with this one.
even the other fam who may disagree with me about stringer bell's qualifications can now can see from this example that you are incapable of discussing the wire.
even YOU said that killing D was probably a smart move now you talk against it?
um, no, stringer bell did not grow the business. stringer bell undermined the barksdale organization while avon was in jail. and not coincidentally, stringer bell also set in motion the deeds that would ultimately lead to his own demise at the hands of brother mouzone (and omar).
The reason Stringer got killed was because dumbass Avon wouldn't listen to sound advice. They needed to make the deal with Prop Joe to keep the towers, His ass was in jail and wouldn't listen to his number two or his sister on what was going on. If Avon had listen to Stringer about Prop Joe's package, Stringer wouldn't have been in the position he was in. Giving Prop Joe's people some of the towers ended up making them money!
Did you even watch the show? In the funeral parlor when he is talking to the crew he tells them that even with half the real estate profits grew. It was when he was telling them that it's not about turf, it's about product. "we got the best product so it's gonna sell no matter where we sell it."
Bottom line Avon got out thought by Omar & Marlo. When Stringer tried to give him advice about not putting a price on Omar's head and just let the shyt die down then when he pops his head up we get him, Avon ignored it until Omar shot his ass outside the strip club. When he was trying to get Avon to go another way about Marlo he wouldn't listen and got shot up again!! He did realize Stringer was right until after Stringer got shot! He was such a bitch that he sat in the room pouting while Slim Charles and them were ready to war up. "If it's a lie, then we fight on that lie." They could have had Marlo and been out of the flop house if his bitch ass wasn't sitting around pouting.
They needed to make the deal with Prop Joe to keep the towers,
His ass was in jail and wouldn't listen to his number two or his sister on what was going on. If Avon had listen to Stringer about Prop Joe's package, Stringer wouldn't have been in the position he was in.
In the funeral parlor when he is talking to the crew he tells them that even with half the real estate profits grew. It was when he was telling them that it's not about turf, it's about product. "we got the best product so it's gonna sell no matter where we sell it."
Bottom line Avon got out thought by Omar & Marlo.
keep the towers? stringer made the deal AND gave up HALF the towers.
that's your problem, isn't it? you're so enamored of stringer that you can't see that he stepped outside his paygrade.
stringer had to listen to avon; avon did not have to listen to stringer. avon was the shot caller, stringer strayed out of his lane.
you say stringer wouldn't have been in the position he was in, but you ignore that stringer shouldn't have tried to step into a position he clearly wasn't qualifed for to begin with.
sigh.
you trot this bullshit again after i refuted it several pages ago?
profits grew, yes. profits grew compared to a time when they had no product. OF COURSE they grew over what they had been immediately before. did they grow over what they had been a year before?
right. dudes on here with no business experience trying to discuss profit.
and again, as far as the turf v. product argument goes, for the 1,000,000th time, marlo proved which was more important. both components important, but turf wins out. we know this from the show, and we know this from REAL WORLD experience.
does mcdonalds have 1 restaurant, or a string of franchises?
right. doesn't matter if they make the best (subjective) fast food product. it matters that they have dozens of locations to sling that shit throughout your neighborhood.
stringer and you both need remedial business classes.
*sigh*
Stringer was shrud enough to grow the business while von was in jail, did he not? He had the nigga set up in a condo and a Navigator in his own name because "they were making so much straight money that they could carry shyt like that in the open" Remember Stringer saying that? They were what Freemon and McNultry feard... THE BANK!!! But Avon was too short sighted to see it. All he had to do was post up and let the money continue to flow but he wanted to fight over some corners that didn't matter. And he wasa getting his ass kicked by Marlo in the war.
You say that Stringer wasn't ruthless enough to be Michael. NIETHER WAS AVON!! MICHAEL KILLED IS BROTHER, AVON COULDN'T/WOULDN'T DO HIS OWN NEPHEW WHO WAS WEAK AND HE KNEW! I know that some guy that looked like Stringer must have fukked you or beat you up as a kid and it made you hate his character to the point you want him to be the most incompetant dude on the show but he wasn't.
Yeah he snitched on Avon, Like he said..."it's just business" Avon was getting in the way of business. Avon on the other hand left his boy, childhood friend, to get got by his arch enemy, the man who stole from him and a dude from out of town. If he was really a baller and ruthless he would have turned that shyt around and got both of them instead of letting his boy get got.
*sigh*
look if cranrab thinks future hall of famer, two time defending NBA title champion and #6 on the all time scoring list at 32 years old, kobe bryant is not only a flat out BUM but deserves no respect ... how do you figure you can get him to change his opinion about a fictional character?
![]()
c'mon, really? now you're going to hide behind usage of present/past tense (is a coat tail rider v. was a coat tail rider)?
i used the past tense because the stringer bell character is deceased.
let me point out how seriously flawed your reasoning is. you (and others) are asserting that russell stringer bell, the most repeatedly incompetent and fatally inept member of the barksdale organization for 3 seasons, wasn't always that way.
and some people in this thread have the unmitigated gall to suggest that i have been the party making inferences.
and no, my position does not require inference or speculation as yours does, because avon has provided examples from the past which highlight stringer's lifelong stupidity.
B & B is your single (best?) evidence?
really?
because that is arguably part of the best evidence AGAINST stringer bell. first of all, they were never completed. they were a money pit, not a source of revenue. and your use of future tense clearly indicates that you are using hypothetical to substitute as real proof.
the condominiums were a complete failure, not a measurable success in the slightest. it's no coincidence that the B & B sign is in the background of the shot immediately after omar and brother mouzone execute stringer. the B & B financial albatross was stringer's tombstone.
want more proof? how about direct testimony from stringer bell? in 1 of the clips you referred to earlier (just a gangster, i suppose), listen carefully to stringer bell's explanation of his dream. it is the rambling of a idiot. an ambitious idiot, but a complete idiot nonetheless.
a) the goal of money laundering is to take illegal proceeds and funnel them through legit businesses to hide their origin. the barksdale family knew this (ex. apartment buildings, copy shop, strip club, funeral home, etc). but if you listen to the MORON stringer bell, he wanted to take already clean money and finance the package.
that fool wanted to move money in the opposite direction! listen to him, he said it himself. it's times like these when i agree that many a watcher of "the wire" were either on smoke breaks or stuffing their mouths with cheetos instead of paying attention.
stringer bell was a simpleton. no doubt stringer bell had ambition. unfortunately for the barksdale organization, stringer bell's intelligence did not match that pie-in-the-sky ambition. stringer bell is the same type of mark that falls for the MLM schemes because they can't recognize a fraud.
stringer bell was trying to sell avon on that stupid shit too, but avon was smart enough to see through the bullshit.
stringer didn't want OUT; he just didn't want to get his hands dirty. stringer bell didn't have the fortitude to make the necessary sacrifices.
going back to the scene you referenced earlier (just a gangster, i suppose) that further illustrates how monumentally STUPID stringer bell was.
b) listen to the laughable (pitiful?) explanation he provides avon. it shows what a tremendously flawed and false understanding he has of both the legit and criminal world. start from where stringer begins "...we finance a package..." and you'll laugh out loud like i did.
apparently stringer bell isn't familiar with the concept of "unexplained wealth". and apparently stringer bell thinks that financiers of criminal conspiracies are exempt from prosecution.
watching episode 11 here is something to consider:
By stopping the "hit" on Clay Davis, Avon basically kept Bell from
making a HUGE mistake that would've gotten him locked up for LIFE
and MAYBE even the death penalty....
Stringer Bell pays Avon back by getting him arrested red handed