The libertines love to have the right to be whatever they want to be so of course they are upset whenever Trump tells the truth (which is rare)Trump was right . If you see something different maybe you need professional help
Maybe because he was once a Democrat himselfThe Democrats (especially the super liberals) love Trump like a love struck sidepiece
"It just seems that the economy does better under the Democrats than the Republicans. Now, it shouldn't be that way. But if you go back, I mean it just seems that the economy does better under the Democrats....But certainly we had some very good economies under Democrats, as well as Republicans. But we've had some pretty bad disasters under the Republicans."
Hmmm.....
Let 50 say it and you may have your answer Trump is gangsta to some people.
Chill out it's a joke just like this election process from both Democrats and Republicans lol. I thought that was obvious.Da fuck does this bullshit have to do with the 14th Amendment?
50 Shits talking on the phone to Trump don't mean shit.
Birther Trump claiming that Obama wasn't black or born in the U.S.?
or this Trump:
https://www.vox.com/2016/2/7/10931176/donald-trump-eminent-domain
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vera_Coking_house
Trump is and has been a criminal and should be in jail.
Not only that, he's a shitbag human being and anybody looking up to him is a shitbag, too.
to be fair, she goes home and sucks white dick every night and she supposed to have us in mindimagine a man with a white excop mother in law who lives in his house & get her meals from fba donations & the other shacking up with a white lesbian but somehow these 2 get to tell ppl who is black or not
As black men, we have to look at things critically, evaluate without emotions, and be honest with ourselves.
It is surprising that Trump went on a public panel hosted by the National Association Of Black Journalists. Obviously, the environment has few if any on his supporters. This opened up a valuable opportunity to hurt Trump's chances before the election. The opportunity was squandered because the journalist came off way too hostile. Instead of asking open ended questions about his policy and views, she made statements and cross examined him as if he was on the stand in court. She came off as emotional, biased and unprofessional. It is a shame it was at the National Association Of Black Journalists. A good journalist would have asked open ended questions with followups without emotion and personal opinion attached to them.
Much of the opinion of how Trump did in this interview is shaped by how people felt about him prior to this interview. His supporters can key in on how unprofessional the journalist was, how unprofessional the National Association Of Black Journalists were to invite him under false pretense, that the National Association Of Black Journalists was late for an interview panel with the former President of the US, and how gracious it was for Trump to even show up for the National Association Of Black Journalists while Kamala Harris didn't. They will also continue to believe that Trump gave ungrateful black folks' jobs and gave alot of money to HBCUS. Alot of people do believe that Kamala Harris panders to Black folks. I've heard Black folks talk about Kamala Harris not identifying as Black and her sexual history before she was selected as VP. He did not look bad enough to lose any supporters from this interview.
Trump's detractors will key in on him making false statements, being disrespectful to Kamala Harris, and him not answering her questions. While I believe all of this to be true, the Interviewer blured the lines by not appearing impartial.
Most of these ignorant ass nigs and trolls have exposed themselves in this thread.You start out in 1954 by saying, “******, ******, ******.” By 1968 you can’t say “******”—that hurts you, backfires. So you say stuff like, uh, forced busing, states’ rights, and all that stuff, and you’re getting so abstract. Now, you’re talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you’re talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is, blacks get hurt worse than whites.… “We want to cut this,” is much more abstract than even the busing thing, uh, and a hell of a lot more abstract than “******, ******.” - lee atwater
Ya'll better learn history. These white devils have been doing this shit in front of our faces for centuries. And because we grabbed the low-hanging fruit now our backs are against the wall. If you don't think this shit is serious, you'd better think again.
VOTE BLUE!
Exclusive: Lee Atwater’s Infamous 1981 Interview on the Southern Strategy
The forty-two-minute recording, acquired by James Carter IV, confirms Atwater’s incendiary remarks and places them in context.www.thenation.com
......... I hear all that, but... ... ... So??? At this point you voting for or against Trump. We got film on him, we know what he is, and we got his playback for next term. The fact that a former president can't handle some attitudinal black women just further proves he aint fit for the job. I've seen Obama stair down adversarial journalist and hadle it with grace. I've seen Joe do the same. Trump, for seemingly the first time in 8 year is in a room where he's not preaching to the choir and like the fraud he is... He fuckin folded. Naaaaa. This didn't sway anyone for or against him. If anything, it hurt Trump with black men. I simply can't rock with any bruh that's cool with watching a racist disrespecting our women.As black men, we have to look at things critically, evaluate without emotions, and be honest with ourselves.
It is surprising that Trump went on a public panel hosted by the National Association Of Black Journalists. Obviously, the environment has few if any on his supporters. This opened up a valuable opportunity to hurt Trump's chances before the election. The opportunity was squandered because the journalist came off way too hostile. Instead of asking open ended questions about his policy and views, she made statements and cross examined him as if he was on the stand in court. She came off as emotional, biased and unprofessional. It is a shame it was at the National Association Of Black Journalists. A good journalist would have asked open ended questions with followups without emotion and personal opinion attached to them.
Much of the opinion of how Trump did in this interview is shaped by how people felt about him prior to this interview. His supporters can key in on how unprofessional the journalist was, how unprofessional the National Association Of Black Journalists were to invite him under false pretense, that the National Association Of Black Journalists was late for an interview panel with the former President of the US, and how gracious it was for Trump to even show up for the National Association Of Black Journalists while Kamala Harris didn't. They will also continue to believe that Trump gave ungrateful black folks' jobs and gave alot of money to HBCUS. Alot of people do believe that Kamala Harris panders to Black folks. I've heard Black folks talk about Kamala Harris not identifying as Black and her sexual history before she was selected as VP. He did not look bad enough to lose any supporters from this interview.
Trump's detractors will key in on him making false statements, being disrespectful to Kamala Harris, and him not answering her questions. While I believe all of this to be true, the Interviewer blured the lines by not appearing impartial.
Marc Lamont Hill is a fucking idiot and a liar. I remember old people not fucking with people because they weren't like them. Go back to the 60s in the South speaking that Nation of Islam stuff and Black people back then would raise their eyebrow.
Back in the day Black people would ask who is they people?
Respectfully, bro, what does religious identification have to do with racial identity? The NOI aren't Christian so, of course, Black people, particularly in the South, would give it the side eye.Marc Lamont Hill is a fucking idiot and a liar. I remember old people not fucking with people because they weren't like them. Go back to the 60s in the South speaking that Nation of Islam stuff and Black people back then would raise their eyebrow.
Back in the day Black people would ask who is they people?
What happened is people not from this country started putting native born Black people whose ancestors built this country down.And I'm old enough to remember when people did ask who your people were but I'm also old enough to remember people who lighter-skinned, or had a Eurocentric or otherwise racially ambiguous appearance being present in our community.
This bullshit did not become an issue until Yvette and Tariq made it an issue. What happened to "we come in all colors"?
And I'm old enough to remember when people did ask who your people were but I'm also old enough to remember people who lighter-skinned, or had a Eurocentric or otherwise racially ambiguous appearance being present in our community.
This bullshit did not become an issue until Yvette and Tariq made it an issue. What happened to "we come in all colors"?
I was just using that as an example because I thought it was easier to understand.Respectfully, bro, what does religious identification have to do with racial identity? The NOI aren't Christian so, of course, Black people, particularly in the South, would give it the side eye.
But that's a different topic from racial gatekeeping. You think people in the 60s would've said Adam Clayton Powell Jr isn't Black.
If cope was a drug, that subreddit would be Kensington and Allegheny. Just a bunch of dumbasses sucking each other off, and the second someone doesn't contribute to the rhetoric, they get banned from the forum.